Arson, Murder, and Jaywalking: Difference between revisions

Everything About Fiction You Never Wanted to Know.
Content added Content deleted
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 10: Line 10:


{{examples on subpages}}
{{examples on subpages}}

{{reflist}}
{{reflist}}
[[Category:{{PAGENAME}}]]
[[Category:Tropes of Legend]]
[[Category:Tropes of Legend]]
[[Category:The Last of These Is Not Like the Others]]
[[Category:The Last of These Is Not Like the Others]]
Line 19: Line 19:
[[Category:This Trope Name References Itself]]
[[Category:This Trope Name References Itself]]
[[Category:Older Than Feudalism]]
[[Category:Older Than Feudalism]]
[[Category:{{PAGENAME}}]]

Revision as of 19:45, 28 March 2022


When listing three or more things, apparently the rule is to not finish strong: list some strong examples followed by a very weak example. This is especially evident in a List of Transgressions: you'll frequently find Arson, Murder, and Jaywalking mentioned in the same breath. It is most often used for comedy, but can also be used for character development.

This is Truth in Television to a certain extent. Some district attorneys will charge a criminal with every single crime they committed in the process of committing their greatest transgression, resulting in situations where a murder suspect is actually technically on trial for homicide, trespassing, and illegal parking.

See also: Good News, Bad News, The Triple, Odd Name Out, What Do You Mean It's Not Heinous?, Arson, Murder, and Lifesaving. Compare Poke the Poodle, All Crimes Are Equal, Jaywalking Will Ruin Your Life, when the minor crime carries significant consequences.

The inverse is Bread, Eggs, Milk, Squick, where a list of seemingly mundane things ends with something much darker.

Examples of Arson, Murder, and Jaywalking are listed on these subpages: