Automoderated users, Autopatrolled users, Bureaucrats, Comment administrators, Confirmed users, Moderators, Rollbackers, Administrators
214,446
edits
All The Tropes:Style Guide: Difference between revisions
→Internal Links (Wicks)
Line 117:
Sometimes you might think it's necessary (or more attractive) to use a pothole with a work name. For instance, the ''[[The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy]]'' novels are all described on subpages under [[The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy]], like ''[[The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy/So Long, And Thanks For All The Fish]]''; potholing that link to ''[[The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy/So Long, And Thanks For All The Fish|So Long, And Thanks For All The Fish]]'' just looks better. Go ahead and do that. Just be careful not to misspell or otherwise mangle the work name in the pothole. And once more, if you're not sure how to code a pothole, the markup is <code><nowiki>[[link|pothole text]]</nowiki></code> -- the link, a vertical bar, and then the text you want to have go to that link.
While you can pothole a plural version of a page name, you don't need to. Both <code><nowiki>[[Gasshole|Gassholes]]</nowiki></code> and <code><nowiki>[[Gasshole]]s</nowiki></code> create the link [[Gasshole]]s, and the shorter version is easier to read in the
Again, [[Pothole]]s are good, while [[sinkhole]]s are bad. Potholes and Sinkholes where different parts of ''the same word'' link to different pages are horrid - there's no way for a casual reader to know (or even suspect) that there's more than one link in the word. Unless you happen to take advantage of the wiki's color-coded internal links, but then it looks [[It Gets Worse|rid]][[From Bad to Worse|icul]][[It Got Worse|ous.]] It's also an [http://blogaccessibility.com/sin-2-of-inaccessible-blogs-using-consecutive-one-worded-links/ accessibility sin].
| |||