Special:Badtitle/NS90:Talk:Complete Monster/Dragon Ball/"Examples" that should NOT be seen here.


 * Commander Red - Fails the heinous standard, particularly in comparison to Tao Pai Pai.


 * Demon King Piccolo - For one, he's Made of Evil. And Piccolo is Piccolo. His offspring was also his reincarnation, meaning he carries on his spirit. He was, of course, redeemable.


 * Raditz - Fails the heinous standard, has an on-screen body count of one (the farmer), shows he has some care for his brother and respect for his nephew, and is portrayed as potentially redeemable in spin-off games.


 * Nappa - Eclipsed in heinousness by several villains, including Vegeta. Every murder committed by Nappa was on Vegeta's call or watch.


 * Chilled - It was flat out pointed out that he "wasn't much more than a schoolyard bully compared to Frieza."


 * King Cold - We don't see enough of him for him to be even close to as heinous as Frieza.


 * Bibidi - Same as King Cold, only replace "Frieza" with "Babidi".


 * Alternate Future 17 and 18 - Had a Freudian Excuse for how they were, and were shown to at least care about each other. 18 also had a Pet the Dog and Even Evil Has Standards moment in "The History Of Trunks".


 * Hoi and The Kashvar - An entire race can't qualify, their crimes were mostly off-screen, and even Hoi is insufficiently heinous compared to his competition. And the entry was terribly written too.


 * Van Zant - Tao Pai Pai makes him look tame in comparison, and he fails to stand out as heinous in a saga that features Babidi and Evil Buu. He's not "just as bad as intergalactic warlords or insane androids", and being indirectly responsible for another villain's atrocities is not enough to qualify him here.


 * Broly - While in his debut movie he was a solid contender, he was characterized as either mentally impaired or even actually redeemable in subsequent appearances.