Pay It Forward/WMG

Pay It Forward's Broken Aesop is intentional.
It's actually a Family Unfriendly Aesop about the futility and limits of good deeds. Consider:

Every good deed Trevor does just barely escapes failure. The homeless man relapses into his drug habit; his mother's and Eugene's relationship turns sour not long after Trevor brings them together, and then fails again as her ex-husband comes back; and shortly after that, the ex-husband becomes abusive again. Trevor only succeeds due to what appear to be very calculated plot points, and then with tons of angst on his part.

Also, why do

Also also, the very premise of "pay it forward", as noted in the Broken Aesop entry, can mislead people into thinking that they only need to help people if someone has helped you, and after the quota of three people they don't need to help anyone else again. Who started this project? Trevor, of course—and he's the only one who started helping people a priori. A lot of people might have taken it up only for self-centered reasons, and didn't bother to continue the project because they had their own more important shit to do (which may explain why )

All of this leads to some very unpalatable conclusions:
 * Ordinary people are too afraid to take action when they see the slightest risk to their lives;
 * People don't help other people for sincere reasons;
 * If you are sincere, your good deeds are bound to backfire and hurt you;
 * Even if they do work, they probably won't last for long;
 * All the good you do doesn't stop the bad guys from winning;

Adding these all up: it's too much trouble to do good. Just keep to yourselves and you'll be fine.

As for the Glurge-y nature of the film, it might well be a Stealth Parody of similar Glurge stories, and possibly a stealth Take That towards idealists like Trevor—and by extension, many of the viewers.


 * My God. I... I think I like the film now. Noooooooooooooooo!