Spousal Privilege

"George: Don't worry, Michael. [conspiratorial whisper] They can't convict a husband and wife for the same crime! Michael: Yeah, that's not true. At all. George: ...I have the worst f---ing attorneys."

- Arrested Development

At a less enlightened point in legal history, a woman's legal identity was overtaken by her husband. One of the results of this, when mixed with another old legal concept (you could not testify at your own trial), was that a wife could not testify, for or against, her husband. As the rules regarding legal personage and testimony changed, this turned into a rule that one spouse could not give adverse testimony against the other. Over the course of the 20th century, this rule has continued to change, generally transforming into a sort of privilege for certain communications.

Currently, in U.S. federal court (other nations' courts and State courts frequently have a different, typically lesser, degree of protection), two spousal privileges exist:


 * 1) Marital confidences privilege: Any private conversation between spouses during the marriage, even if the two are later divorced, is not admissible as evidence, unless both allow its admission.
 * 2) Spousal testimonial privilege: If one spouse is on trial, the other cannot be compelled to testify against the one on trial. "Compelled" is important here; if one spouse wants to, say, sell the other out to the cops, the spouse is free to do so. (Note that this is considerably different from other sorts of legally recognized privileges. In those cases, the party the information is adverse to has the control.) Unlike the Marital confidences privilege, the two have to be married at the time, but this privilege also covers things before marriage.

If they are on opposite sides of the lawsuit, such as in divorce proceedings, child custody, or when one is the plaintiff and the other is the defendant, all spousal privilege is suspended.

When this is used in fiction, it tends to be ... broadly used to say that the other spouse can't be a witness, whether he or she wants to or not.

Fanfic

 * There is a Luke/Mara fanfic, where the Republic wants to prosecute Mara for her crimes. Their only witness is Luke. Now, being a Jedi Master, he's not supposed to lie... so he marries her, and thus gains the right not to testify.

Film

 * In Angel Face (1952), Diane Tremayne conspires with chauffeur Frank Jessup to murder her parents by tampering with their car. Both Diane and Frank are arrested for the deaths, but they get married so they cannot be made to testify against each other.

Literature

 * In The Nine Tailors by Dorothy L. Sayers, the police won't allow to marry until the case is resolved, as they might need her testimony against him.
 * A major plot point in Agatha Christie's Witness for the Prosecution.
 * In the Perry Mason book The Case of the Curious Bride, the defendant's husband has damaging testimony against her. His family does not approve of her, so they're trying to get the marriage annulled so his testimony will be admissible.
 * A major plot point in Brighton Rock.

Live Action TV

 * In Weeds, Peter—who is a DEA agent—gets Nancy to marry him in Las Vegas to convince her that he won't try to arrest her for selling pot. The implication is that he'd be in huge trouble if his wife was a drug dealer, so he'd have a selfish reason to avoid arresting her rather than merely his word, but since he knew she was a drug dealer before they got married, the marital confidences privilege wouldn't apply and the spousal testimonial privilege wouldn't stop him from testifying if he wanted to.
 * In ''The Sopranos, Adrianna gets this idea from a late night crime show and proposes to Christopher so she can't testify against him. Unfortunately, some clarification from an actual lawyer points out the flaws in this plan.
 * In Arrested Development, George Sr. (mistakenly) thinks that a husband and wife cannot be arrested for the same crime. When corrected by his son, he says "I have the worst fucking attorneys."
 * This is a staple of Law and Order, which tends to ping pong around a bit between marital confidence and spousal testimonial privilege, depending on the needs of the episode.
 * One notable example is the episode "Gov Love", which is about the interaction between spousal privilege and gay marriage, and where the spouse cannot be compelled to testify.
 * In the earlier "Ego", a spouse who wants to testify can't because of the privilege.
 * It also plays a role the 2009 season finale "The Drowned and the Saved", and many others.
 * One episode of SVU revolves around the concept that two Complete Monsters had married their victims precisely to abuse spousal privilege, something with which they openly mock the detectives. Their overconfidence eventually backfires when.
 * The Closer used variations on both types, on different occasions.
 * In the first instance, the wife claims spousal privilege so she can't be forced to testify against her husband, which Brenda tells her doesn't apply in this case, though in the end, she testifies of her own will.
 * In the second instance, the wife, after being told that her husband is a war criminal and likely murderer, she, in a state of shock, relates how her husband came home covered in blood (which she presumed was from the assault on him), then invoked spousal privilege and told the police they couldn't act on the information in that conversation. Brenda complies, and tries to find probable cause to search for traces of blood,.
 * Invoked in Downton Abbey, where Anna is forced onto the sidelines at Bates' trial.
 * In Boardwalk Empire Nucky marries Margret partly so she cannot testify against him in his trial for the murder of her first husband.
 * In this Saturday Night Live sketch combines this trope with I Have This Friend

Real Life

 * One of Al Capone's lieutenants, Jack McGurn, married his girlfriend—who was also his alibi for the St. Valentine's Day massacre—so she couldn't be compelled to testify about it in court.