Broken Base/Oral Tradition

Religious sects are not immune to this. In fact, these can often be worse than most, as dozens, hundreds, or even thousands of actual deaths are not an uncommon occurrence as a result of these arguments.

Note that a Real Life subject like this can be somewhat touchy, so please, use caution when adding examples. -
 * The Bible has more of this than the rest of this page combined.
 * A really interesting case appears concerning versions of The Bible. For instance, there are those who consider the King James Version the only Holy version and believe you will go straight to Hell if you read the New Living translation, The American Standard, or any other translation. On the flip side you have those "enlightened" Christians who refuse to use a version of the Bible published prior to 1988.
 * Just those? How about the people who believe it should be written/read in nothing but the original languages (for those not paying attention, that's predominantly Hebrew and Greek, with other languages thrown in all over the place) vs. the people who believe it should be written/read in one's own language.
 * And how about the folk who honestly believe that the KJV supercedes the original - witness (pun not intended) "If your original Hebrew disagrees with my original King James --- your original Hebrew is wrong." How I wish I were making that up.
 * And then there's the issue of if the Bible ends right before the New Testament, the Bible ends right before the Koran, or if The Koran is canon too. And then there's The Book of Mormon... Much of recent world history is the result of different segments of the base arguing over where Canon Discontinuity starts.
 * Filioque. (See the other wiki here. The phrase literally means "and from the Son". The dispute is whether the Holy Spirit (the third Person of the Trinity) proceeds from the Father (the first Person of the Trinity) or from the Father and the Sone (the first and second Persons of the Trinity). That's it. Yet that (together with some more political disputes) resulted in the division of Orthodox Christianity from Western Christianity (Catholicism and Protestantism).
 * There was considerable resentment that the pope introduced the -que (which had often been used in the West) without consultation.
 * After that, you get into the fun times of the Reformation. Martin Luther vs. Catholicism, John Calvin vs. Martin Luther, a whole bunch of guys vs. Calvin, the sectarianism goes on and on.
 * And now, the more "liberal" Protestant churches are splitting over the issues of homosexuality and the ordination of women.
 * Call it a GRINDED base. There was a time that churches split over the question if the snake REALLY spoke in Genesis, if there could be flowers on the altar, and over how often you should celebrate communion. Many churches are dissapearing because their followers keep dying away, with the remaining few going to bigger churches.
 * Don't even bring up the question of whether the Bible should be taken literally or not.
 * Among a lot of mainstream and minority churches, believers are split along the lines of: "We should be prepared to compromise in order to win over new believers."/"This isn't a popularity contest, we don't budge an inch."
 * Buddhism - Theravada or Mahayana? Or maybe Tibetan? or Zen?
 * Rinzai, Obaku or Soto Zen?
 * Which Sutra? The Diamond? The Flower Sermon? One of the lesser ones?
 * Is Reincarnation real or does it not matter?
 * A common question is whether it's Reincarnation or Rebirth and which one do Buddhists believe.
 * Is the Buddha a God?
 * It's actually official doctrine in the Hindu religion that Buddha was an avatar of the god Vishnu. Whether all Buddhists believe this, though, is another story
 * Hindu doctrine states that Vishnu incarnated as Buddha to teach a false doctrine to ensnare demons.
 * That's an oversimplification. Many, probably most, Hindus came to accept Buddhist doctrine (or aspects of it) as valid, and the Brahmin priests were forced to accept that. The real Base Breaker among Hindus when it comes to Buddhism is whether Buddhism actually counts as a separate religion, or whether Buddhists are just "Hindus in denial, going by a different name," as some Hindus have argued (needless to say, most Buddhists would be rather annoyed at this characterization).
 * Is Buddhism a religion or a philosophy? Is Buddhism theistic, atheistic, or neutral?
 * Most Asian Buddhists seem to lean more towards religion, more often than not. It's often white Western Buddhists who prefer to call it a "philosophy."
 * Can you be Buddhist and another religion?
 * Sunni vs. Shiite Islam.
 * Unless you want to start a flame war, it's better to avoid discussing the Second Vatican Council among some Catholics. There is a great variety of views, from the majority who are quite comfortable with the changes to the Mass (which include saying the mass in the local language rather than Latin, the addition of a richer variety of Bible readings, the priest facing the congregation during the Mass, among others) to those who dislike it due to tradition, to those who think it is sacrilegious and will go out of their way to find a parish offering an officially-permitted Latin Mass, to those who with a straight face believe that every Pope since John XXIII (who opened the Council) is a pretender and that the Papacy has actually been vacant since Pius XII...
 * Even more may happen once the new revision and translation of the Roman Missal (the official framework of the Mass that all churches in America work from), meant to bring the wording of the Mass more in line with the original Latin and that changes some of the rituals, is introduced in November 2011.
 * Heck, even mentioning pretty much any rumored apparition of the BVM after Fatima can start a flame war.
 * Some of these views can and do exist within extended (and even immediate) practicing Catholic families. Talk about awkward holiday dinners...
 * If you're a Hindu, try mentioning the Kama Sutra to your pandit (that's a priest, for any non-Hindus reading this) or any fellow Hindus who happen to be elderly. They will almost definitely react in a horrified, scandalized fashion. This is due to the fact that even though Hinduism used to have much more "modern" (for lack of a better word) view of sex in ancient times, over the past few centuries, both conservative Muslim and Victorian British conquerors imposed a much more conservative view of sexuality after they conquered India, and this conservative view still pervades much of Hindu society today.
 * The more conservative Hindu factions in India (although that's a Broken Base in and of itself) vs. the much more liberal form of Hinduism practiced in Guyana, Trinidad and the other Caribbean nations with large Indian-descended populations (the British brought a lot of Indians to the Caribbean as servants). The Indian Hindus will accuse Caribbean Hindus (particularly Guyanese and Trinidadians) of "acting white", being "not Indian enough," and of being too liberal and permissive. Meanwhile, the Caribbean Hindus will accuse the Indian Hindus of being "old-fashioned," "ultra-conservative," and "too strict."
 * To clarify for non-Hindus, virtually no Caribbean Hindu practices vegetarianism unless it's a religious holiday, with the only exceptions being the priests. Caribbean Hindus typically abstain from beef or pork, but have a long culinary tradition with other meats. Caribbean Hindus also tend to have much more liberal views of sexuality than modern Indian Hindus (for the reasons why India became conservative on those issues, see the Kama Sutra entry above on this page). Finally, and this is the big one that seems to be a major Berserk Button for many Indian Hindus, Caribbean Hindus generally do not speak Hindi at all, and grow up speaking Caribbean English dialects as their native language. Hindi remains a liturgical language among Caribbean Hindus (much the same way Hebrew is for American Jews, or the way Latin used to be for the Catholic Church), but most Caribbean Hindus know only a handful of Hindi words at most. This tends to really result in Flame Wars where Indians and Indo-Caribbeans end up at each others throats.
 * The non-religious in general. It been said that getting a group of atheists to agree on something or to unite for or against something is like herding cats.
 * Specific examples: should we call ourselves atheists or agnostics? Should we work with religious believers, against them, or both? Are all ideas fair game in the marketplace of ideas, or should we be sensitive to the strong attachments people might have to their beliefs?
 * Christians, Jews, and Muslims all believe in the same deity. Beyond that they don't really agree on very much.
 * They don't even really agree on THAT. This troper literally can't count the number of times he's been told by completely sincere Christian friends that Muslims actually worship Satan, and that "Allah" is just their name for Lucifer.
 * Raise the question of whether or not God even exists, and if so, how involved He/She/It is in the lives of humans. (Especially in "religion vs. science" debates). Watch the fur fly, along with vicious insults...and chairs.
 * The Uniting Church in Australia (UCA), the third biggest church in Australia, is somewhat broken over whether or not gay and lesbians (in same-sex relationships) can be ordained as ministers. It's been debated since 1982.
 * Christianity in general is full of these. Just a few examples: "Jesus was human!"/"Jesus was divine!" (The Council of Nicaea almost literally came to blows over that one.) "I have to do my service in Latin? Not happening!" "The Sacraments belong to everyone, not just the priesthood!" "There are seven--no, six--no, two Sacraments!" "Jesus came to America and he told me all about it on these gold tablets!" "It doesn't matter what you say this passage means, I know what God's real intentions were." "You've become corrupt, our way is the pure, original truth!" "We don't need the church to tell us what to do, just the Bible." "It doesn't matter what Jesus said about forgiveness and grace, it's predetermined who goes to Heaven."
 * The East-West Schism, sparked by a number of Broken Base matters of their own, is the greatest example to be found in the history of Christianity. The differences in faith created mutual distrust between the Catholic and Orthodox churches and sparked many wars during the course of several centuries.
 * In the 17th century, Nikon, the Patriarch of the Russian Orthodox church, worked on several reforms to update the Russian liturgy to match the Greek. These reforms were protested by a group that eventually became known as the Old Believers. Although initially outlawed and persecuted, the Old Believer's religion survived and they still continue their traditional ceremonies distinct from mainstream Orthodoxy.

"Back to"