Never Live It Down/Literature

""No, senor, that's not true," said Sancho, "for I am more cleanly than greedy, and my master Don Quixote here knows well that we two are used to live for a week on a handful of acorns or nuts. To be sure, if it so happens that they offer me a heifer, I run with a halter; I mean, I eat what I'm given, and make use of opportunities as I find them; but whoever says that I'm an out-of-the-way eater or not cleanly, let me tell him that he is wrong; and I'd put it in a different way if I did not respect the honourable beards that are at the table.""
 * The Three Musketeers only say "All for one and one for all!" twice in the original books; most adaptations have them saying it all the time. Then again, they do claim it is their motto.
 * Don Quixote is well-known for being an idealistic fool in a cold grey world, a laughingstock and Butt Monkey. As a result, there's a huge Misaimed Fandom that sees him as an ideal to strive for even if he can't win. The original Quixote was an idealistic fool, but it wasn't his entire character. Both the Misaimed Fandom and the people who laugh at him forget that he was also an unsympathetic snob, who used his "knighthood" as an excuse to not pay for things and to bully his social inferiors, especially Sancho. Part of why he isn't remembered this way is the Man of La Mancha, which emphasized his foolish idealism a lot more. ("Dream...the impossible dream...")
 * Not exactly. In the first part of the novel, Don Quixote characterization is Lord Error Prone. Misaimed Fandom insisted to see him as the Mad Dreamer. So Cervantes explore all the ramifications of the trope showing how everyone wants to be with the Mad Dreamer… to mock him mercilessly. At his death, Don Quixote becomes Bored With Insanity and laments that he is going to being remembered as a mad fool. Man of La Mancha is a mere Derivative Work that completely misses the point of the original work’s conclusion, but reproduces the Misconception of Romantic times applied to Don Quixote.
 * In the first part of the novel, Sancho Panza has several scenes enjoying food and drink to show his easygoing nature. When Avellaneda published his own second part of the novel, he accused Sancho of being a Big Eater. In Cervante’s second part of the novel, Don Quixote’s niece acuses Sancho of this (she hates him) and later, when they know about Avellaneda’s second part, Sancho defends himself against this accusation:


 * Ginny Weasley of the Harry Potter series has a reputation in the fandom for being a little tart who can't keep her knickers on. In the canon, she dated three guys (no, not at once) over a period of four years before marrying the last one. Interestingly, Hermione has also dated exactly three people, one for rather petty reasons, and no one accuses her of being a slut.
 * There's also Dumbledore, who was gay. He did some other stuff, but mostly, he was gay. You can understand why Rowling didn't insert this fact into the books, since Dumbles' primary characteristic since the Word of Gay announcement is that he was gay. Man, people who refuse to read a sentence from the books or watch one minute of the movies are more likely to know that than any other detail of this importance inserted in the books!
 * In a truly bizarre twist of logic, after Rowling offered her Word of Gay, many Moral Guardians actually decried Rowling for inserting a gay character into her books, claiming that it was inappropriate. While the subtext is there if you look for it, a person could easily (and millions did) read all seven books and have no inkling that Dumbeldore was gay. But no, the fact that Rowling said he was gay at a convention automatically imprints this onto everything he did, and is already fast at work retroactively poisoning our children's minds.
 * Draco Malfoy is often called Ferret, Ferret Boy or some form of that insult in the fandom, referring to an incident in which Mad-eye Moody turns him into a bouncing ferret. In the book, there is not much mention of the incident after the fact.
 * Ron tends to be described by people as a slob and flat-out idiot, who gobbles food nonstop and is horribly abusive to his angelic wife, Hermione. In the books, Ron was more laid-back and certainly not as driven as Hermione, but it was mentioned that he and Harry did about equally well in their classes (Harry was mostly forced to learn extra things to save his own life). And Belligerent Sexual Tension aside, there was never any indication that Ron was or would be abusive towards Hermione, or indeed that he'd be capable of it if he wanted to be. The worst he ever did was when he
 * This is arguably a case of adaptation decay - due to the movies cutting out most of Ron's good scenes, giving his best lines to Hermione and turning him into a bit of a comic relief caricature of himself.
 * James Potter won't live down . People who've suffered bullying in the past would see James as a spoiled brat that got everything handed to him while Snape had to suffer his whole life.
 * Mind you, Severus was hardly any better. He purposely invented a spell whose sole purpose is to slash a person "as if with a sword" and was getting friendly with the the Death Eaters whilst he was in school, and became a Death Eater in later life. But thats the Power of Fangirls! who ignore these little details.
 * Alanna from the Tortall books suffers from a similar reputation, despite having had relationships with a grand total of three guys in her life, each of them long-term and serious, one of which became a marriage. Yet that's still more than any of Tamora Pierce's other protagonists (except Briar in the Circle of Magic universe), so she gets stuck with a Slutty McSluttington image in some readers' minds.
 * The books were banned from a few school libraries as a result of her supposed sexual promiscuity, which probably didn't help.
 * An in-universe example is Kyp Durron, a powerful young Jedi who once got either possessed or heavily influenced by an ancient and very evil ghost, and who then fished out an indestructible superweapon that had been dropped into the heart of a gas giant and proceeded to use it to cause a supernova that destroyed a rather populated planet. He was then very quickly and easily brought back into the light and put the superweapon into a black hole, then got off basically scot-free in the trilogy where he originally featured. Basically every book to feature him since then has called him on it, particularly I, Jedi, a sort of Fix Fic trying to get the trilogy to make sense, where the main character leaves in disgust after this mass-murderer is welcomed back into the Jedi Academy for training. Other books paint Kyp as the perpetual Atoner, having it and his lack of punishment constantly brought up.
 * Sometimes (including in I, Jedi) the death toll of Kyp's attack is vastly exaggerated, because apparently killing a few million people isn't bad enough; it's necessary to falsely claim he killed billions so that it can be put on the same level as the destruction of Alderaan (bonus fail points: said destruction is attributed to Darth Vader instead of the man who actually did it, Grand Moff Tarkin). The fact that the majority of the population were Imperial soldiers also tends to be ignored. Of course, Kyp himself doesn't consider that much of a comfort, given that many of those soldiers (including his own brother) were conscripts. And to make it worse, from New Jedi Order onward, Kyp is a Jerkass who's no longer interested in atoning for his sins.
 * A few of the people in the Bible have traits they'll never live down. "Doubting" Thomas springs to mind.
 * Yeah, and in his case, I think part of it is that he wasn't there the first time, according to John, so he got some focus on him for that reason, as well as his own "text bite". Mark records that they hadn't believed Mary Magdalene or two of the others when they told the disciples about it, and that Jesus "upbraided them with their unbelief and hardness of heart, because they believed not them which had seen him after he was risen." Luke and John record that He showed them His hands; Luke says feet as well while John says side. So yeah, they also didn't believe, and also needed it proven; maybe another factor was that he didn't believe them.
 * Bible researchers have also pointed out that the characters of those who told Thomas weren't impeccable either: John, who had an awful temper, and Peter, who denied Christ thrice.
 * This happens in continuity in the Wayside School book series. There were three kids in the class named Eric (Fry, Bacon, and Ovens). Eric Bacon and Eric Ovens were bad at sports so everyone just assumed Eric Fry was bad at sports when he was actually great. The only time people noticed him playing was when he caught a ball that slipped out of his hand. Everyone called him "Butterfingers" after that.
 * This happened with both of the others as well. Eric Bacon is much skinnier than the other two, yet he's called "Fatso;" Eric Ovens is easily the nicest and most easygoing, but he gets nicknamed "Crabapple."
 * In universe example with the Discworld character, Sam Vimes. One of his ancestors, Stoneface Vimes, led an army of rebels against the insane, murderous, pedophile king. But after their victory, no judge or jury could be found that would dare stand up against royalty. So Stoneface took matters into his own hands and performed the execution himself. Despite thus being one of the most important figures in Ankh-Morpork's history, the one thing everyone remembers about him is that he was a "regicide". The modern Vimes dislikes that term, saying "It was only one king. It's not like it was a habit."
 * It probably doesn't help that the modern Vimes reminds everyone of Stoneface.
 * Another in-universe example comes in Thud! when Vimes describes the painter Methodia Rascal as "Painted famous painting, thought he was a chicken, died."
 * Josella Playton in The Day of the Triffids writes a novel which her publisher ends up titling Sex Is My Adventure. Even years after civilization has collapsed and the eponymous killer plants are running amok, people she meets are still mentioning this book.
 * Richard Rahl, protagonist of the Sword of Truth, once led his troops to cut through a peace protest staged by Too Dumb to Live political strawmen to get to the Complete Monster villains they're guarding, during the book that even fans acknowledge is best ignored. The key word here, of course, is "once". A good chunk of the times it's mentioned on this wiki, though, it's phrased to make it sound like he spends all eleven books doing nothing but slaughtering pacifists.
 * In-Universe example in A Song of Ice and Fire: Jaime Lannister is forever known as the Kingslayer for murdering the man he was supposed to protect. What is forgotten is that the king in question was a Complete Monster . The reason this became his defining moment was because only a few people knew that, and most of them were killed in the uprising going on that same night, or deliberately chose not to mention it.
 * Also in A Song of Ice and Fire, Catelyn Stark, despite being a kind and caring mother and a woman with a strong sense of honor and duty, is often remembered for being a stone-cold, callous bitch for her poor treatment of her husband's bastard son, Jon Snow: . She never lives that one down, it seems. It's a big Kick the Dog moment, but let's be perfectly honest: who doesn't get one of those in this series?
 * Twilight may be popular for other things, but now thanks to the movie, everyone associates the entire saga with sparkly vampires.
 * Baseball-playing sparkly vampires.
 * The sparkly vampires were already infamous (at least among Fan Haters) before the movie, but the movie definitely compounded it.
 * The sparkling emphasis was overblown for the first installment, in which Edward's glistening skin got exactly one chapter in which it was referenced (chapter thirteen). Things were taken to a bit more of an extreme in New Moon, when the glittery skin played a key part in Edward's suicide plan...somehow. By Breaking Dawn, Bella talks about her glittery skin like it's a stigmata in one scene.
 * Fan Haters now have the Ho Yay between Edward and Jacob.
 * In Nursery Crime: The Big Over Easy by Jasper Fforde, Chief Inspector Spratt is constantly having to defend himself against a reputation for killing giants ("Technically, only one of them was a giant; the others were just tall.") Of course, his full name is Jack Spratt. As in 'Jack the Giant Killer', which might have something to do with it.
 * The titular Jacky Faber in the Bloody Jack series seems to live this trope. "It's the talk of London!" "It's on all the Broadsheets!" "There's even a song about it!"
 * While Sherlock Holmes used cocaine in a more than a couple of stories, he was an addict, not of that drug, but of mental exercise. His brain had to be constantly working or else it would "rebel." When on a case or any other activity that he would consider mentally challenging, he would stop using for as long as his brain was entertained. If one only knew Holmes from fanfics and pastiches (professionally published fanfics), he turns into a drug-addicted genius who needs a constant high to function. In such stories, his drug of choice is usually changed to opium for whatever reason, even when it was specifically stated in the canon that he doesn't do opium. This is also carried over to more official adaptations.
 * Playing on the only-woman-to-outsmart-Sherlock-Holmes angle, all adaptations portray Irene Adler as a notorious Catwoman-like criminal mastermind, despite her only "crime" in the one story she appears in being possessing a photograph that someone fears she could use to blackmail him... which she ultimately never does. Perhaps it's just easier to put Holmes' Worthy Opponent on the opposing side of the law.
 * Arguably also the Breakout Villain Moriarty, who encountered Holmes once in person and also sent him a letter once, but is only ever remembered as 'Holmes's Arch Enemy'.
 * Another good Sherlock Holmes example is the famous: Elementary my Dear Watson. He never actually said that in any of the books...the numerous remakes are another case though.
 * In universe example in The Black Company series. In the first novel, Croaker writes romantic fiction about the Big Bad who is employing them. Almost two decades later, people are still bringing it up..
 * In the first Sweet Valley Twins book, Jessica shows up for ballet class decked out in sparkles and ribbons. The teacher proceeds to publicly humiliate her, blasting her for this, and for several months afterwards, acts completely oblivious to the fact that Jessica is the best dancer in the class, instead, blatantly favoring the less skilled Elizabeth.
 * Good luck finding a hater of the Inheritance Cycle who doesn't notice the Ho Yay. Constantly. Admittedly, even the people who like the books notice this too.
 * Same goes for Ender's Game (there was one fight in showers, OK? One fight!), though considering Orson Scott Card's recent activities, it's hard to feel bad for him.
 * Perhaps it's safe to say that Johanna of The Hunger Games fame won't be living down stripping down naked in an elevator and casually chatting with Katniss and Peeta any time soon.
 * Or Katniss agreeing to . Some people ignore the fact that  . Try putting those people in the same situation, and just lets see how they react.
 * Yes, in Percy Jackson and The Olympians Nico  And   torched New England.