Special:Badtitle/NS90:Talk:Complete Monster/Berserk/"Examples" that should NOT be seen here.


 * Gambino - The original entry for him on here flat out stated that he had some "tough love" for Guts and truly did love Sys enough to blame Guts for her death (altruistic qualities) and that Guts felt terrible about having killed him (thus he's not never portrayed in a positive light and Guts doesn't fear or hate him). Therefore, one Moral Event Horizon crossing does not invalidate that he fails those criteria as well as the heinous standard, nor does he ever become an example.


 * Donovan - He's a vague plot device of a character who fails to measure up in a world filled with more heinous characters beyond being a pedophilic rapist.


 * The Torturer - A nasty piece of work for sure, but his acts are mostly off-screen, and not only does he fail the heinous standard, he fails it compared to the guy he tortures. That's a colossal failure!


 * Bishop Mozgus - He's a mentally disturbed Knight Templar who has shown altruistic qualities on occasions (like caring for his torturer henchmen, which his old entry actually admitted to) and is less heinous than some of the monsters he fights.


 * The God's Hand - Their moral agency is questionable and a whole group or species cannot qualify anyway.


 * The Idea Of Evil - No moral agency - it's very nature is evil by default, with no choice in the matter.