Special:Badtitle/NS90:User talk:Honorshipper/Why I blocked you.

We were in the middle of discussing Mombi's qualifications for this trope when you, out of the blue, edited down Mombi's existing entry and put up one for the Nome King, who's way too mitigated to count as even a borderline example and your entry even said so.

I've stated many times before that on ATT, which examples for the Complete Monster trope go up or get cut/downvoted are handled by measuring the candidate by the criteria given for passing the trope (including on the main trope page and extra info found of the Analysis page), checking with others to ensure the validity of the candidate's qualifications, and ultimately coming to an agreement or compromise. (Some borderline examples go up if their qualifications are still sufficient enough, others are purely YMMV) It's not about getting your way in regards to candidates you personally think should qualify due to your own personal feelings and standards, even at the expense of the majority opinion or the actual trope-passing criteria that they align with or not. This is not an Audience Reaction trope - there's a balance of subjectivity and objectivity that has to met in regards to this trope.

I understand you and your sister (if that's really what she is) have had frequent trouble with this on Villains' Wiki, and likely on TV Tropes as well. Failing to grasp how the trope is handled here only results in needless edit wars, arguments, and eventually blocks. When your block period is up, I will give you one more chance to conduct yourself better both here and at Wikia. Please refrain from any sudden additions or deletions of examples on this trope. When you have a candidate in mind, go thoroughly examine their character and the trope criteria to see if they match up, then take the issue up with me or other tropers before anything officially goes down on the trope. No more of this knee-jerk stuff, please? This will be your last warning and last chance.