Special:Badtitle/NS90:Talk:Complete Monster/Western Animation/Chester V and Rumpelstiltskin/reply (7)

The issue is that a Complete Monster ought to be successful in some serious crime(s) even if they're not successful with their main objective and what they attempt to do to achieve it. From what I gather, Chester was only successful at being a toxic influence on Flint and creating a rift between him and his friends, but everything afterward was attempts at worse crimes that never got off the ground aside from his one Moral Event Horizon moment. This makes him not sufficiently heinous enough to qualify, compared to someone like Rumple who we see on-screen erasing people from existence, killing one of his witches, persecute a race that he's made an endangered species already, and cause the temporary death of the protagonist.

And I'm sorry to play the "judging a book by it's cover" game, but between a guy who looks like this, a guy who looks like this and a guy who looks like this, which of them would you assume is least likely to be a Complete Monster?