Media Research Failure/Web Original

On the internet, information is little more than a click away. Unfortunately, so is a sea of misinformation.

Web Animation

 * In the 2009 edition of the calendar The 365 Stupidest Things Ever Said, one contributor attributes the phrase YOUR HEAD A SPLODE to "the video game Homestar Runner" (as opposed to being from a game based on the online animated series Homestar Runner entitled StrongBadZone), not to mention that the silliness of this choice of words was a deliberate parody.

Webcomics

 * Is Oasis lying to Sluggy? As the article is attributed to the author, it has to be parody.
 * Reportedly, one website describing Homestuck early into the comic's run referred to the post-apocalyptic nomad advising John as the Wandering Vagrant. The comic exclusively calls him the Wayward Vagabond
 * A recent NY Daily News article put the trolls as the main characters when describing Homestuck. While minor, long-time fans of the series will skip aprrox 6.12 beats after reading it.
 * There was also a recent article in which the author interviewed a Homestuck cosplayer. When they said that they were cosplaying Eridan Ampora, the interviewer took that to mean that all of the trolls were named Eridan Ampora.
 * This article profiling notable self-sufficient web-cartoonists falls into this trap more than a few times. Marten has never worked at a coffee shop, and Pintsize can't really be considered a pet; Jeph Jacques later joked about making Marten work at Coffee of Doom to make the article accurate. Mistaking MS Paint Adventures as being made in MS Paint is a more understandable mistake, but MS Paint hasn't been used for it at all since the very first page in 2006, and the site's FAQ makes that quite clear.

Web Original

 * i think Halo is a pretty cool guy. eh kills aliens and doesn't afraid of anything.
 * In this blog post, baby-name expert Laura Wittenberg explains how distracting names that reveal that authors Did Not Do the Research (e.g., a Work Com with an entire office full of men in their 30s who have names that are popular now but not so much in The Seventies) have become to her.
 * The above example pretty much only fits the trope to said expert alone, since people have been giving themselves and their children odd or out of place names for millennia, and fictional media ain't exactly a bastion of reality in the first place.
 * The point is that one or two characters having names that seem out of place for their age or demographic is fine but it's implausible when the whole cast do.
 * The humour in Cracked.com is often an example on this. You may laugh at how silly the, say, Polish movie posters are, unless, of course, you happen to know that some of the pictures are not movie posters but, say, a comic parodying the film. Or, for that matter, how the Voynich Manuscript is described as undecipherable for all the wrong reasons.
 * An article on Japanese versions of Western characters claimed that Luke chopped Vader's head off. Which he did. In the cave on Dagobah where, if you recall the scene from the movie, he chopped Vader's head off. It also claimed that Hellsing using the name Alucard was a clumsy way to avoid copyright issues over using Dracula, despite the fact that 1. Dracula is in the public domain and 2. in Hellsing Alucard is Dracula, which is explicitly confirmed when he reveals his true form and how he came to serve the Hellsing organization.
 * The Agony Booth's recap of High School Musical made an error by saying that Ashley Tisdale basically played an identical Alpha Bitch character on that "awful sitcom The Suite Life of Zack and Cody". If you're not familiar enough with the show to know that Ashley Tisdale plays the exact opposite character type on that show, you obviously haven't even seen a commercial for it, and probably shouldn't be making judgments about it.
 * When a school shooting rekindled discussions in Germany about video games being responsible for real life violence, the news broadcast Focus TV showed the infamous clip of the "Angry German Kid", claiming that the footage was secretly recorded by Leopold's father while he got mad playing on his computer. (If you didn't know by now, the clip was staged and recorded by the 'kid himself for the lulz.)
 * When The Nostalgia Critic announced his appearance in the Entrepreneur magazine, we all went straight to or searched for the article online! But here's the thing: Mike Ellis and Mike Michaud have been mislabeled in the article.
 * Plus, Doug and the Mikes are listed as co-founders and runners of Channel Awesome...but not even a mention of Bhargav?
 * It's The Entrepreneur Magazine's way of keeping the Indian man down! It's BULLSHIT!!!
 * Moreover, the article actually goes into detail in another Channel Awesome website, the much less popular Chicago nightlife review site Barfiesta instead of mentioning Bhargav, when that site is actually Bhargav's pet project. Weird, huh?
 * X-Entertainment liked to play on this trope when it still published articles, particularly for franchises that the author isn't interested in. Example: Behold!, an article on the Strawberry Shortcake cereal getting the names of Apricot and Hopsalot Bunny wrong, even though the correct names were mentioned in the commercial that's available for download from the same page!
 * An image for the "Bleach Has No Backgrounds!" meme had a shot of Bleach compared to a shot from Naruto and One Piece respectively. While this isn't a problem if you want to make a point, the problem is that the pictures from the other two were of cities, while the picture from Bleach was of...Hueco Mundo, a statedly empty and barren desert.
 * Arguably, the real issue is that Naruto had a visibly bigger animation budget (possibly because the original manga's art style was inspired by Akira and they wanted to do it justice), and One Piece's art style (being more cartoony) works better with a smaller budget than Bleach's does.
 * Animated Views has so many of these it's not even funny. A few of the examples include an assumption that Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer began airing with "Fame and Fortune" instead of "We're a Couple of Misfits" in 1998 as opposed to 1965 (1998 is actually the year "We're a Couple of Misfits" returned to Rudolph, a fact the reviewer could have confirmed simply by watching the previous year's broadcast!), a lament that the "Recommended Features" box on the Toy Story 3 Blu-Ray does not include a link to Day and Night even though the link is randomized, and could link to that short on certain viewings, and an assumption that in the Watchmen graphic novel, Dr. Manhattan and the squid were the same being (a site devoted to animation probably shouldn't review Watchmen in the first place!).
 * Spoony's Deadliest Character: Megazord VS Mechagodzilla video was chock full of innacurate discriptions and blatant Critical Research Failure including-
 * 1.) Talking about the Showa (1974) Mechagodzilla while showing clips of Kiryu. While Kiryu is an incarnation of Mechagodzilla, it is not the same monster (The original Mechagodzilla is a robot built by aliens to take over the world and Kiryu is a cyborg version of the original Godzilla).
 * 2.) Saying that Mechagodzilla was unable to defeat a single monster (IE: Godzilla). In reality, Mechagodzilla is one of the few Kaiju that Godzilla is unable to defeat on his own. The Showa Mechagodzilla required the aid of King Caesar (Godzilla VS Mechagodzilla) and humanity (Terror Of Mechagodzilla) to defeat.
 * 3.) Completely ignoring (or simply not knowing about) the fact that Mechagodzilla also has an ally in the form of Titanosaurus.
 * Yes but the that was an intentional parody.