Poe's Law/Quotes
So, White Man's Burden, you're a poem. And more then a century after Kipling wrote you, scholars still disagree over whether he was kidding.
—John Green, Crash Course (web video)
|
These examples, as absurd as they may seem on the surface, are not outliers or aberrations — they are some of the most massively viral “Is this true?” subjects we’ve ever undertaken. They put the lie to common refrains about “obvious humor,” “obvious satire,” “obvious jokes,” or “obvious” anything else. Quite evidently nothing can be put online — no matter how preposterous in concept or plainly labeled it might be — that some people won’t believe to be true (or at least allow might be true).
|
Imagine if, in 1729, there had been a number of letters to the editor by various authors proposing that Irish children be exterminated and eaten. Imagine that laws of that nature were being seriously debated in Parliament, and that one of the parties had made it a part of their platform. While the laws were being regularly defeated, opponents still had to stand up and seriously debate why it was unethical to eat babies. Imagine that a candidate for prime minister actually solemnly suggested that we ought to at least consider the merits of eating Irish children. — PZ Myers
|
There are a number of spoof sites on religion (and it's a measure of what's at the bottom of the barrel on the religious side that it can be hard to tell the spoofs from the real deal). There is, for example, The Society of Christians for the Restoration of Old Testament Morality (sorry if I blew your cover) or Landover Baptist Church (much easier to identify as a spoof, although I have no doubt there are people who miss it). Read their mail page. Read the religious believers praising them for their stance. Then read the nonbelievers flaming them. Then come back here and tell me with a straight face that nonbelievers are inherently more rational, better informed, and better at critical reasoning than believers.
— Steven Dutch, The Dumbest Statements About Religion
|
Some conservatives consider noted homophobe Fred Phelps to be so over-the-top that they think he's a "deep cover liberal" trying to discredit more mainstream homophobes.
— RationalWiki, on this trope
|
Most of the themes in my comic strip "Dilbert" involve workplace situations. I routinely include bizarre and unworldly elements such as talking animals, troll-like accountants, and employees turning into dishrags after the life-force has been drained from their bodies. And yet the comment I hear most often is: "That's just like my company." — Scott Adams, The Dilbert Principle
|
HAHAHAHAHA - Oh wait, you were serious, let me laugh even harder. — Bender Bending Rodriguez, Futurama
|
The problem with irony and satire is the dumb motherfuckers don't get it. —Ray Wylie Hubbard
|
If the video was intended to be a parody of teen pop convention, it would be on par with some of the best SNL Digital Shorts by Lonely Island. |
And what I'm doing now, as everyone in this room understands - just in case there's anyone from the Mail On Sunday watching this - is I was using an exaggerated form of the rhetoric and implied values of Top Gear to satirize the rhetoric and the implied values of Top Gear. And it is a shame to break character to explain that, but hopefully it will save you a long, tedious exchange of emails. |
It is the divine will of our Lord Kek that our enemies be parodies, living cartoons for our amusement. The memes must flow. —Sisyphus Rex, on Twitter[1] (this tweet and OP are SFW, but since the thread was about an activist/"performance artist" specializing in
|
Handle: Every time I watch that ’10:10 no pressure’ video I cannot quite bring myself to believe it was made in total earnest and not the result of some insider sabotage and subversion. Just plausible enough to get the contract, but so absurdly demonstrative of the fanatically coercive nature of the climate campaign that it can’t possibly have been made by someone actually trying to rally the troops while making not-so-subtle threats to holdouts. — comments on The overclass hates you in Jim's blog
|
There is no idea so stupid that you can't find a professor who will believe it. |
It has come to our attention that some people are suggesting that "dog paper" was accepted because reviewers are busy people and — @RealPeerReview thread on a hoax paper titled Human reactions to rape culture and queer performativity at urban dog parks in Portland, Oregon.
|
The notion that the nursery rhyme “Sing a Song of Sixpence” was used as a recruiting song for pirates was invented by us as an example of a story so incredibly silly that no one could possibly believe it to be true.
|
- Back to Poe's Law