I've already gave you messages about this.
Topic on User talk:Looney Toons
The last revert was because you were evading a ban. It had nothing to do with accuracy.
Regardless, are you in some way blocked from editing the page?
CC: @Labster, @GethN7, @Robkelk, @QuestionableSanity, @Derivative, @SelfCloak
No, but I thought that if I reverted your edits it would start edit war because I undo an admin's edits.
And you reverted those edits just a little after or before I were blocked, I recognize my behavior was bad and I apology for my that and breaking the rules, but don't dwarf things please.
"Rollback"
You want reassurance? You may go ahead and recreate your contribution. I will not consider it edit-warring with me.
Thanks, and I apology for my previous behavior.
I had undone the undoings before seeing this discussion, with the reason "Just because it isn't canon for the games doesn't change the fact that is it canon for the comics - and it's clearly marked as such." My apologies.
If there was a different reason to remove the text that you removed, please mention that reason in your edit. I will not treat that as edit-warring with me if you give that reason.
Because darkstalkers IS A VIDEOGAME.
Did you read the comics? Then you'll know why having that information in the videogame's page is wrong, specially considering the "benevolent" part, since in those comics they are portrayed as malevolent and evil succubus, basically like any other succubus in history.
In fact, how can you exactly need a "reason"? Being canon to the comics means nothing because darkstalkers is a videogame and the comics are only a non-canon adaptation, if anything that information should be given in the comics' tropes place and be informed it's an adaptation and not something official with the story.
The joker died in batman's movie, so why the joker keeps appearing alive in other movies, videogames or more batman's media? Because it's something it only happened in a non-canon source, not a original source like the comics would be. That's why the information and the tropes that referenced his death are only applied to the movie.
Darkstalkers is a videogame, not a comic, and capcom have done good confirming only the games' events and facts are canon, just like morrigan being a descendant of Morgan Le fay is something the cartoon came with, the whole eternal bliss thing is just stuff the UDON crew came along making Morrigan and Lilith evil monsters, nothing that happens in the comics can be related to the games and for so the official characters and their lore.
For Morrigan and Lilith specially, since the comics basically take only their names and race, their characters there heavily contradict what Capcom made them to be.
I'm saying this mostly because I hate those versions of the characters, but also because it's something that should be obvious giving most adaptations or media are given tropes specifically to those sources rather than the original cause the original does not play those tropes.
I mean, do you realize how having that information as official in the videogames' folder contradicts a lot of tropes applied to both Morrigan and Lilith, right?
Come on dude, how it can be I even need to explain you this.
There was an American Darkstalkers cartoon, and they explicitly kept Morrigan's species. She even drained somebody, although it was just by kissing him.- This is from the darkstalkers cartoon, which is why it is written in the cartoon's folder.
Come on dude, how it can be I even need to explain you this.
You're assuming that I watched the cartoon, or read the comic books. I haven't. Nor do I have time to read and watch everything described here - nobody does.
All I have to go on is what's written on the wiki... and if people don't write reasons for deletions, then I have nothing to go on. Random deletions without reasons are a sign of wiki vandalism - and without edit reasons, your edits look random.
Well, I did said the comics aren't canon, but you reverted them saying it doesn't matter if they are canon or not but are marked as such, I didn't really understand what you meant there.
Anyway, that would be my reason.
I'm not assuming nothing since I listed that as my reason and you still reverted it, you are the one who asked for reasons, I just answered.
Tone down the arrogance, Infinite, you're starting to tread close to a rule 1 violation again. Rob posted his initial message to apologize for his edit -- screaming at him because he doesn't have your level of knowledge on an obscure (and by mainstream standards it is very obscure) franchise is a dick move. We have some 35,000 different works documented here, if not more, and nobody can be expert on them all. Show a little grace, accept that we're not stomping on your edits, and be grateful you weren't thrown out on your ear the last time -- because we probably won't be as generous the next time.
And before you demand to know why I'm putting my two cents' worth in, remember that you're being an ass on my talk page, in a conversation you started with me.
You know what? I'm done with this. I don't know what kind of education you have or what are your standards on what "obscure or ass" is, but I'm not making any "dick move".
Even if I was rude or whatever, he asked me for reasons, I gave them my reasons, so sorry if I was so rude delivering an answer.
I remind you I only started this to avoid a very expected edit-war if I just reverted your edits, I care about giving accurate information and I like to edit, but if you are going to act like hurt victims whenever I sightly rise my voice to give an answer or a opinion you better just perma-block me right now.
I see apologizing and trying to talk wasn't grace, and threaten me won't make me give any of you more respect, he asked me for reasons and I gave him reasons, maybe I went too far or whatever but I'm not assuming nothing either, just giving what I was asked.
If anyone is arrogant here Looney, I'm afraid it's you.
I apology for the trouble I've gave you, if you want, revert my edits again as revenge.
Goodbye, I enjoyed my time here.
I'm sorry you feel that way. We're not so petty that we will revert your changes out of "revenge", because choosing to leave the wiki isn't something to take revenge on. Nor will we ban you or otherwise penalize your account. We're not TVT, after all.