... appears to be a zero-content edit, changing nothing, removing nothing, and adding only some whitespace that the next editor would most likely remove (as per the wiki's Style Guide).
I suspect that you missed adding whatever actual content that you wanted to add.
-- Robkelk, admin
Ah, sorry - I see that you made three edits and removed the text that you originally wanted to add. The forum software was "helpful" and showed the result of all three edits in a single view.
I'm not sure why you removed it; while it's controversial, it isn't false.
I was thinking of clarifying that BDSM "slavery" play was the only justified kind of "slavery" (quotes intentional) but gave up on it because 1) it added nothing special (and it was covered by all the other BDSM pages anyways) and 2) it was controversial, and in a way that could actually cause issues. I've been trying to avoid adding anything like those Tumblr edits I did a while back, which I must admit are not fit for a site like AllTheTropes.
...But changing the tumblr page to openly declare LGBTQ+ to be perversion is a) unwelcome and b) irrelevant to the page. Not to mention stating definitively -- with no evidence whatsoever -- that the tumblr LGBTQ+ community is single-handedly responsible for a number of social developments you clearly dislike is fallacious.
You've been a good editor for a long time now. Keep your politics and prejudices out of the wiki and you'll stay one.
-- Looney Toons, admin
@Labster @Looney Toons @GethN7 @Robkelk @QuestionableSanity @Derivative @SelfCloak
Please note that we are being nice to you, in that we are only undoing your edits.
"Adding incorrect text and presenting it as fact" is specifically listed on All The Tropes:How We Do Bans Around Here. Opinions, even opinions that particular religions dictate, are not facts; facts have evidence to support them.
-- Robkelk, admin
@Biomaster @Labster @Looney Toons @GethN7 @Robkelk @QuestionableSanity @Derivative @SelfCloak
Protip, for something this contentious, keep your language absolutely neutral, levying no judgment or definitive statements of your own, and if it's going to be divisive, point to a source to back up your claim that is reasonably trustworthy like a news source that cites evidence.
If you can't, don't post it at all., especially if it's going to broach politics and other sensitive topics you cannot resist being unobjective about.
Because of your consistent good edits -- and making a lot of them since you joined us not that long ago -- you've been granted membership in the automoderated and autopatrolled user groups. This means that your edits will no longer require a wiki admin to approve them before they are applied to the wiki. We look forward to more of your quality contributions!
-- Looney Toons, admin
@Labster @Looney Toons @GethN7 @Robkelk @QuestionableSanity @Derivative @SelfCloak
A quick reminder that links to other sites are formatted this way:
[http://example.com Display Name]
Which should appear as:
You've been doing pretty well overall and I'm no mod of any kind, this is just a tip from a fellow editor.