Automoderated users, Autopatrolled users, Comment administrators, Confirmed users, Moderators, Rollbackers
23,028
edits
(clean up) |
Derivative (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{Useful Notes|wppage=Ad hoc hypothesis}}
'''Ad Hoc''' ("To This") reasoning is where someone fails to understand that there is a difference between argument and explanation. The Ad Hoc fallacy is to give an after-the-fact explanation which doesn't apply to other situations. If we're interested in establishing A, and B is offered as evidence, the statement "A because B" is an argument. If we're trying to establish the truth of B, then "A because B" is not an argument, it's an explanation.
It's a very common sight in [[Justifying Edit|justifying edits]] aimed at any supposedly negative trope, particularly if that edit calls upon things that ''might'' have happened to cause the item described.
{{reflist}}
[[Category:Logical Fallacies]]
[[Category:Ad Hoc]]
[[Category:Pages with working Wikipedia tabs]]
|