Alternate Animal Affection: Difference between revisions

m
clean up
m (clean up)
Line 1:
{{trope}}
[[File:simbanala_6214simbanala 6214.jpg|link=The Lion King|right]]
 
There's a problem that arises in stories featuring reasonably anthropomorphic animals, both of the plain old [[Talking Animal|talking]] and [[Funny Animal|funny]] varieties. Many writers want to include romantic plots or subplots in these works. For human characters, [[True Love's Kiss|a kiss]] often serves as [[Sealed with a Kiss|the closure]] to a [[Will They or Won't They?]] arc.
Line 8:
Well, usually one of two things:
 
* '''Ignore it.''' Anatomy? What anatomy? For the purposes of the work, a duck's bill can become just as pliant and squishy as human lips so that [[Donald Duck|Donald and Daisy]] can have their smooch. [[Funny Animal|Funny Animals]]s, or just those in less-realistic works, tend to get saddled with this option.
* '''Come up with an alternate gesture with the same meaning.''' After all, real-world animals ''do'' have ways to express affection, so why not? Common choices for this one include: Licking (like [[All Animals Are Dogs|dogs]]), rubbing noses/snouts, [[Headbutt of Love|bumping foreheads]], or crossing necks (which can also substitute for a hug). Works with [[Talking Animal|Talking Animals]]s, or more realism, tend to use this. Alternatively, it might just be more whimsical.
 
Compare [[Fantastic Arousal]], for less... innocent situations.
Line 20:
* ''[[My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic|My Little Pony Friendship Is Magic]]'' has actually shown both variants of the trope. Spike fantasizes about kissing Rarity in "A Dog and Pony Show" and is kissed on the cheek twice by Rarity in "Secret of my Excess".
 
=== Examples of Type 2: ===
 
== [[Anime]] and [[Manga]] ==
10,856

edits