Broke the Rating Scale: Difference between revisions

Rescuing 1 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.9.2
m (Mass update links)
(Rescuing 1 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.9.2)
 
(29 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown)
Line 8:
There are six categories:
 
* '''Type 0:''' This is [[Discussed Trope|discussed]]--that—that is, the reviewer openly admits to being tempted to go outside the established bounds of the rating system, but ultimately the reviewer adheres to the rating scale.
* '''Type 1:''' The score is simply outside the established bounds of the reviewer's usual ratings scale (compare [[Rank Inflation]] and [[F Minus Minus]]);
* '''Type 2:''' The score is paired with a nonsensical or unusual unit of measure;
* '''Type 3:''' The score is ''itself'' a nonsensical value (and quite often a [[Take That]]);
* '''Type 4:''' The reviewer admits to having no idea what score to give it ([[Shrug of God|this is essentially a shrug]]);
* '''Type 5:''' And the [[Logical Extreme]], the reviewer simply--andsimply—and often explicitly -- ''refuses to assign a rating at all.'' This can be because the reviewer found the work downright repulsive, or the reviewer found the work to be unworthy of a rating, or it could be because the reviewer decided that a rating was otherwise inapplicable. Sometimes overlaps with [[Dancing Bear]].
 
 
Not to be confused with [[Readings Are Off the Scale]]
{{examples}}
==== Type 0 -- We don't hand out 0's, but maybe we should have for this. ====
=== [[Anime]] and [[Manga]] ===
* [[Desu Des Brigade|JesuOtaku]] usually gives out unusual review scores (see below), but when reviewing ''[[Master of Martial Hearts]]'', she only gave it "one greasy burger out of four" "because frankly, I don't have a lower score."
 
=== [[ComicFan BooksWorks]] ===
==== Type 0--We don't hand out 0's, but maybe we should have for this. ====
* Present in snakesonasora's famous sporking of the ''[[Kingdom Hearts]]'' badfic [http://snakesonasora.livejournal.com/2619.html#cutid1 "Naga Eyes"]. The rating scale (sometimes more a warning scale) is typically 1 to 5 Shadows. For particularly terrible fics, there exists a rare rating of Ansem, which includes everything from 5 Shadows plus extra-high doses of WTF-ery. "Naga Eyes" earned an Ansem, but with this addition attached:
* "This game officially received the lowest score in the history of [[Game Spot]]: a 1.0. And by lowest, I mean it can't go any lower. We don't hand out zeroes, but maybe we should have for ''[[Big Rigs Over the Road Racing]]''" -- [[Alex Navarro]], ''Frightfully Bad Games''
{{quote| '''snakesonasora''': THE ANSEM IS ONLY A FORMALITY. THERE ARE NOT ENOUGH SHADOWS, BEHEMOTHS, ANSEMS, OR XEMNASES TO PROPERLY ILLUSTRATE THE LEVEL OF HORROR PRESENT IN THIS FIC.}}
* "I might have to modify our grading schedule and give it a Z except that [[Insult to Rocks|the poor letter Z did nothing to deserve]] being permanently stuck on a Cassie Edwards novel. " -- [[Smart Bitches Trashy Books|SB Sarah]], reviewing ''Savage Moon'', which got an "F".
 
* When rating [[God of War (series)|God of War]], The Official [[Play Station 2]] Magazine (Greek edition) Commented that they would give it an 11/10, but weren't allowed to, so instead they settled on a 10/10
=== [[Film]] ===
* Film critic Leonard Maltin claimed the movie "Tarzan: The Ape Man" starring Bo Derek was so bad it nearly convinced him to create a rating in his book lower than BOMB. Eventually, he just gave it a regular BOMB.
* [[Desu Des Brigade|JesuOtaku]] usually gives out unusual review scores (see below), but when reviewing ''[[Master of Martial Hearts]]'', she only gave it "one greasy burger out of four" "because frankly, I don't have a lower score."
* To quote IGN's commentary regarding ''[[Panzer Dragoon]] Orta'': "If I could give this game an 11 in graphics, I would. Actually, forget the number you see below. Consider it an 11. This game is unbelievably gorgeous and the screenshots don't do it justice. If this is the tip of the iceberg for Xbox, I pray I never go blind."
* GameCentral's 0/10 [http://www.metro.co.uk/tech/games/886778-postal-iii-review-boll-movement review] of ''[[Postal]] III'' begins with the reviewer wondering whether the game's self-awareness should push it up to 1/10, or if the fact that the developers clearly knew they were releasing a terrible game should push it into the negatives.
* Present in snakesonasora's famous sporking of the [[Kingdom Hearts]] badfic [http://snakesonasora.livejournal.com/2619.html#cutid1 "Naga Eyes"]. The rating scale (sometimes more a warning scale) is typically 1 to 5 Shadows. For particularly terrible fics, there exists a rare rating of Ansem, which includes everything from 5 Shadows plus extra-high doses of WTF-ery. "Naga Eyes" earned an Ansem, but with this addition attached:
{{quote| '''snakesonasora''': THE ANSEM IS ONLY A FORMALITY. THERE ARE NOT ENOUGH SHADOWS, BEHEMOTHS, ANSEMS, OR XEMNASES TO PROPERLY ILLUSTRATE THE LEVEL OF HORROR PRESENT IN THIS FIC.}}
* ''[[Nintendo Power]]'' editor Chris Slate responded to one reader that he had been tempted to award some games a 10.5 out 10, but won't because that will mess up the scale by making 10.5 the new standard. (At the time, only ''[[Resident Evil (video game)|Resident Evil]] 4'', ''[[Super Smash Bros]] Brawl'', and ''[[Metroid Prime]] 3: Corruption'' had received a 10.)
 
=== [[ComicsLiterature]] ===
==== Type 1--On a scale of 1-5: 0 (or [[This Is Spinal Tap|11]]) ====
* "I might have to modify our grading schedule and give it a Z except that [[Insult to Rocks|the poor letter Z did nothing to deserve]] being permanently stuck on a Cassie Edwards novel. " -- [[Smart Bitches Trashy Books|SB Sarah]], reviewing ''Savage Moon'', which got an "F".
 
=== [[Video Games]] ===
* "This game officially received the lowest score in the history of [[Game Spot]]: a 1.0. And by lowest, I mean it can't go any lower. We don't hand out zeroes, but maybe we should have for ''[[Big Rigs Over the Road Racing]]''" -- [[Alex Navarro]], ''Frightfully Bad Games''
* When rating [[God of War (series)|God of War]], ''The Official [[Play StationPlayStation 2]] Magazine'' (Greek edition) Commentedcommented that they would give it an 11/10, but weren't allowed to, so instead they settled on a 10/10
* To quote IGN's commentary regarding ''[[Panzer Dragoon]] Orta'': "If I could give this game an 11 in graphics, I would. Actually, forget the number you see below. Consider it an 11. This game is unbelievably gorgeous and the screenshots don't do it justice. If this is the tip of the iceberg for Xbox, I pray I never go blind."
* GameCentral's 0/10 [https://web.archive.org/web/20121130062327/http://www.metro.co.uk/tech/games/886778-postal-iii-review-boll-movement review] of ''[[Postal]] III'' begins with the reviewer wondering whether the game's self-awareness should push it up to 1/10, or if the fact that the developers clearly knew they were releasing a terrible game should push it into the negatives.
* ''[[Nintendo Power]]'' editor Chris Slate responded to one reader that he had been tempted to award some games a 10.5 out 10, but won't because that will mess up the scale by making 10.5 the new standard. (At the time, only ''[[Resident Evil (video game)|Resident Evil]] 4'', ''[[Super Smash Bros.]] Brawl'', and ''[[Metroid Prime]] 3: Corruption'' had received a 10.)
 
==== Type 1 -- On a scale of 1-5: 0 (or [[This IsUp Spinalto TapEleven|11]]) ====
== [[Comic Books]] ==
=== [[Comic Books]] ===
* Spiderfan.org, which rates ''[[Spider-Man]]'' comic books on a scale of 1 to 5 webs, gave 1998's 'The Final Chapter' no webs, citing Aunt May's being brought [[Back Fromfrom the Dead]] with [[Voodoo Shark|a truly absurd explanation]], and general bad writing. The review concluded by saying the story was a waste of precious paper.
 
=== [[Film]] ===
* When ''SFX'' magazine did their ratings from A to D-, rather than a star system, there was one object (a plastic, life-sized Grey embryo in a jar) which they decided was worthy of an E.
** The film ''[[Species]] II'' got an F on the same scale.
Line 45 ⟶ 54:
* Gene Siskel once chose to remove the film ''Shoah'' from his list of candidates for the year's top ten. He felt it deserved higher accolades.
* Donald Clarke of ''The Ticket'' awarded six stars (out of five) to Michael Haneke's ''The White Ribbon 3D'', an English-language remake of the director's own ''The White Ribbon''. This was a joke: no such movie exists and the review was published on April Fool's Day.
* ''The Boston Globe'' gave ''[[The Human Centipede]] II'' no stars out of five.
** As did ''[[British Newspapers|The Daily Mail]]''.
** [[Roger Ebert]] also gave it zero stars, although that's not QUITE as rare for him. This was slightly different from his refusal to award stars to the original, in that rather than simply having no stars, he explicitly spelled out 'Zero Stars.'
Line 52 ⟶ 61:
* The New York Daily News gave ''[[Battleship (film)|Battleship]]'' zero stars out of five.
 
=== [[Live-Action TV]] ===
* [[SF Debris]] gave the notorious ''[[Star Trek: Voyager|Star Trek Voyager]]'' episode "Threshold" 0 on a one-to-ten scale, with an added message 'May God have mercy on your soul'. This opened the floodgates, as it were, and he's since handed out another for ''[[Star Trek: Enterprise|Enterprise]]'''s "A Night in Sickbay". A few horrible episodes only missed this mark because another is worse and he tries to keep the zero for the single worst episode of each series.
** He has since also given this score to "Code of Honor" of ''[[Star Trek: The Next Generation|Star Trek the Next Generation]]'', and has strongly implied that it will also be given to the ''[[Star Trek: Deep Space Nine|Star Trek Deep Space Nine]]'' episode "Profit and Lace".
** A score of 0 is given to the one episode of a series that brings shame to the entire Star Trek franchise by association.
* Keith D.A. Candido gave the fifth season ender of ''[[Highlander the Series]]'', "Archangel" a 0 out of a 1-10 scale, citing the episode's introduction of an ancient Zoroastrian demon into the Highlander universe, Richie's [[Dropped a Bridge on Him|death scene]] happening as a result of him being handed the [[Idiot Ball]], and a whole bunch of story elements that just don't make sense.
* The Zettai ni Oishii segments of ''[[Gaki no Tsukai Ya Arahende]]'', which feature the cast's attempts at making a specified dish [[Cordon Bleugh Chef|with unusual ingredients]], already has built-in negative values on its ratings scale of -2 to 10. Positive scores are represented by stars, negative scores by skull marks. But on at least one occasion, a dish has been awful enough to get ''two full skeletons''.
* IGN gave its second zero in the site's history (see below for the first) [http://tv.ign.com/articles/121/1214220p1.html to the pilot of] ''[[Work It]]'', which [[So Bad It's Horrible (Darth Wiki)|was unwatchably terrible]].
* In-universe example in ''[[How I Met Your Mother]]'', for the price of a wedding dress. The scale given is [[Undisclosed Funds|"never" to "never ever"]]. The rating is "never ever ever ever ever times infinity".
* For a while, back in the [[David Tennant]] run, the ''[[Doctor Who]]'' website contained episode reviews from a family who gave them a 'fear factor' from 1 (mildly scary) to 5 (extremely scary), shown by the children of the family holding up scorecards. For both [[Doctor Who/NS/Recap/S2 E9S28/E09 The Satan Pit|"The Satan Pit"]] and [[Doctor Who/NS/Recap/S3 S29/E10 Blink|"Blink"]], the children apparently made or found scorecards with sixes on them - a rating given in-text as "Beyond Fear".
 
=== [[Music]] ===
* [[Mark Prindle]] gave [[Madonna]]'s ''[http://markprindle.com/madonnaa.htm#american American Life]'' a zero out of ten. While he's known for often being a [[Caustic Critic]], this was the first (and still only) album to get a zero, and to "commemorate" this he used a new graphic rather than representing the score with those tiny records as usual.
* Thrash metal band Flotsam And Jetsam's debut album ''Doomsday For The Deceiver'' [http://www.allmetallica.com/info/interviews/kerrang86.php got 6 Ks out of a possible 5] from Kerrang! magazine. Kind of a [[Crowning Moment of Awesome]] for a relatively obscure band, considering no other album in the magazine's history has ever received the honour.
* The late, great British radio DJ John Peel ranked new songs on his programme on a 5-star system. When he first played "Teenage Kicks" by The Undertones - a song which would become his favorite song of all time (lyrics from the song are even on ''his tombstone'') - he gave it a score of 28 out of 5 Stars.
Line 69 ⟶ 78:
* The [[Rap Critic]] gave No Love by Eminem (featuring Lil Wayne) six stars out of five, possibly as much from shock that Eminem was on form after several years of mediocrity and Lil Wayne showed his poetic chops in the same song as much as anything.
 
=== [[Professional Wrestling]] ===
* [[Wrestlecrap]]'s description of the Black Scorpion's final appearance, where he landed in a spaceship, says, "On a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the ultimate in stupidity, this rates 178."
* Bryan Alvarez, mentioned below under type 3, is more famous for his howl of [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kmex6H9UVvc MINUS FIVE STARS] (if you absolutely must hear it, skip to 0:46), now used in the opening of Maffew's [[Botchamania]].
 
=== [[VideoTabletop Games]] ===
* Mark Rosewater uses a "storm scale" measuring how likely an ability is to return in new ''[[Magic: The Gathering]]'' products on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being Storm (an absurdly overpowered keyword ability). "Bands with others", a rare (1 set, 16 cards), counter intuitive ("Bands with other Dinosaurs" lets a card band with other cards that have "Bands with other Dinosaurs", not cards with the dinosaur type), variant of an old ability already ranked 10 (Banding) ranked as 11. He's actually stated this twice.
 
=== [[Video Games]] ===
* Apparently, [[Net Jak]] rewrote its code so that it could give ''[[Big Rigs Over the Road Racing]]'' a ''zero''.
* For a fictional example, there's [http://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2005/5/13/ this] ''[[Penny Arcade (Webcomic)|Penny Arcade]]'' strip. After enough bribes have been heaped up, ''[[Donkey Konga]] 2'' winds up with an 11 out of 5 at Gamespy... (see [[Executive Meddling/Other Media|this page]] for more info)
* ''[[X-Play]]'' awarded that [[The Problem with Licensed Games|infamous]] ''[[The Problem with Licensed Games|E.T.]]'' [[The Problem with Licensed Games|game]] a "Zero" out of five, measured on a scale that bottoms out at 1.
* ''[[Guitar Hero]]'' got at least one [[Up to Eleven|11/10]] review.
** Also, ''[[Super Mario Galaxy]]'' on the Italian Official Nintendo Magazine. As the magazine had always been known for being far too generous regarding scores to Nintendo games, readers' backlash raged. Two years later, they gave [[Even Better Sequel|its even better]] [[Super Mario Galaxy 2|sequel]] a [[8.8|10 out of 10.]]
* Polish magazine ''CD-Action'' gave ''[[Limbo of the Lost]]'' a ''negative'' score for plagiarism alone.
** Earlier subverted by the same magazine with their review of ''[[Tony Hawks Pro Skater]] 3''. While they gave that game a 10/10, One of the only two cons they've listed in a summary is "[[Lampshade Hanging|It nearly escaped our rating scale!]]".
* When the original ''[[Wing Commander (video game)|Wing Commander]]'' was released in 1990, it broke several scales in the positive direction. ''[[Dragon (magazine)|Dragon]]'' magazine, for example, rated it as six out of five stars.
* ''[[Half-Life 2]]'' was awarded an 11/10 by ''Maximum PC'' magazine. At the end of a rare-for-that-publication exclusive 5-page spread. If this took place in a gaming magazine, it would indicate an incredible amount of marketing control over the content of the magazine; as it is, with ''Maximum PC'' being a hardware-centric publication that happens to review games on occasion, and the long spreads devoted to a single game being a rarity rather than the norm, it just stands out as extreme fanboyism.
* ''Computer Gaming World'', which normally bottomed out at 1 star, had an "unholy trinity" of games that received zero: ''[[Postal]] 2'', ''Mistmare'', and ''[[Dungeon Lords]]''.
* Averted by EGM -- atEGM—at the beginning and end of the column's lifespan, "[[Seanbaby]]'s Rest Of The Crap" was for games that would warrant zeroes and negative scores on the normal rating scale used by the other reviewers. Pretty much the only reason he was doing this was for the humor value, since, as the very premise states, even the best of the games he reviewed were all the worst in [[Shovelware]].
** Also played straight: ''The Guy Game, Mortal Kombat Advance'' and ''Ping Pals'' all received 0.0s from one of the 3 reviewers (with Ping Pals getting two zeroes).
* Hex and Bajo (of ''[[Good Game]]'') gave ''[[Robot Unicorn Attack]]'' an utterly "ridonkulous" score of [http://www.abc.net.au/tv/goodgame/stories/s2907940.htm 8971] rubber chickens (a standard unit on the site) out of 20.
Line 90 ⟶ 102:
* IGN sometimes gives out a score of less than 1 out of 10, but only ever gave a zero once for a video game, for ''[http://ign64.ign.com/articles/152/152309p1.html Olympic Hockey Nagano '98]'', because it was ''[[Serial Numbers Filed Off|exactly the same game]]'' as ''Wayne Gretzky Hockey '98'' with a [[Palette Swap]].
* An in-game example of a similar system, but not used for ratings: In ''[[Nethack]]'', wands and other magical items that have magical charges normally have some whole number of charges, between zero and a positive whole number, inclusive. If they run out by being used down to zero, they can (usually) be recharged. If you zap a wand of cancellation (whose spell is meant to erase magical effects) at them, their number of charges is set to -1: They can't be recharged at all, even if you have scrolls of charging.
* ''[[Freedom Planet]]'' is pretty much the '''SOLE PRIME MANIFESTATION OF PERFECTION. EVER. PERIOD. HANDS DOWN.''' It's SO successful, in fact, that it was awarded the first ever '''∞''' by Metascore, and in all of history. Two and a half years after its release on Steam, this divine masterpiece of an indie game created by God himself (Stirfe in this case) still retains that rating to this very day, with little to no sign of any declines.
 
=== [[Western Animation]] ===
 
* [[Seanbaby]] gave the ''[[Superfriends|Challenge Ofof Thethe Superfriends]]'' version of The Riddler a -1. He gave [[Aquaman (Comic Book)|Aquaman]] a 1.
== [[Western Animation]] ==
* [[Seanbaby]] gave the ''[[Superfriends|Challenge Of The Superfriends]]'' version of The Riddler a -1. He gave [[Aquaman (Comic Book)|Aquaman]] a 1.
** Although he did explain the logic behind it: Riddler is as useless as an ordinary human being would be against the Superfriends, and then makes it ''worse'' by giving away the Legion of Doom's plans in his puzzles. He's actually a 2 for the hero's side subtracted from his basic 1.
 
=== Other ===
* Kobe Beef can't be rated on the USDA beef scale, because it would be several grades above "prime," the highest grade.
* At the 1976 Summer Olympics in Montreal, Romanian gymnast Nadia Comăneci obtained a perfect score of 10, while the scoreboard could only reach up to 9.99. Her score was displayed as ''1.00''. Whoops. And then, just for good measure, she proceeded to do it ''six more times''. She left the entire gymnastics world gaping in awe as she turned the sport upside down and inside out, and then shook it just to see what came out. It's ''still'' reeling from the aftershocks.
* In the aftermath of the 2009 Australian bushfires, authorities introduced a new fire danger category above "Extreme", named "Catastrophic - Code Red".
* In physics, the Mohs scale of hardness is defined as capping out at 10 with diamond, which was at the time the hardest substance known to man. [[wikipedia:Aggregated diamond nanorod|Aggregated diamond nanorod]], or 'hyperdiamond', is much harder than diamond and thus goes off the top of the scale.
* By definition electric heating is 100% efficient, as electric device efficiency is measure by how much of the result is heat instead of the intended product (for example, a incandescent light bulb is 5% efficient because 5% of the electricity is converted to light while 95% becomes heat). Using electricity to run heat pumps, which relocate existing but unused heat (typically from outside or underground) can result in more used heat than that same electricity being used to make heat, resulting in a process that is ''more'' than 100% efficient.
* Inverted by Canadian laboratory WinterLab, which rates winter boots. Their scale was originally intended to be a 0 snowflake to 5 snowflake rating, but quickly found ''zero'' boots in their first 100 pairs tested were worthy of being rated two and only ten pairs merited even a one, so the scale was limited to zero to three. May potentially be played straight in the future, as with the rate boots are improving, the staff seriously suspects a four will show up eventually.
 
==== Type 2 -- On a scale of 1-5: [[Mind Screw|5 Bananas]] ====
=== [[Film]] ===
 
== [[Film]] ==
* The Dread Central review of ''[[Birdemic]]'': [http://www.dreadcentral.com/reviews/birdemic-shock-and-terror-2010 5 out of 5 Exploding Eagles] (same as the ''The 13th Alley review'')
* In film critic Leonard Maltin's movie guide, he gives the movie ''[[The Naked Gun]] 33 1/3'' a rating of 2 and 1/3 stars, the only time he does this. In his review of ''[[The Naked Gun]] 2 1/2'', he gave it 2 1/2 stars and in parentheses he says, "What else"?.
 
=== [[Live-Action TV]] ===
* On ''[[Saturday Night Live]]'''s Weekend Update recurring character [[wikipedia:Saturday Night Live characters appearing on Weekend Update#Aunt Linda|Aunt Linda]] (played by Kristen Wiig) gives such ratings as "seven "Ghaaas?" and one-and-a-half "Yougottabe Frigginkiddingme!" " (Note that those were both for one work.)
* Lampshaded near the end of season 3 of the American version of ''[[The Office]]'': Pam is keeping track of the points that Michael gives various competitors, but Michael keeps changing the method in which he rates them (i.e., a gold star to the winner of event 1, 10 points for event 2, a checkmark in event 3, etc.). The end result is that Pam can't convert the scores over between events and has no idea who's actually winning.
* [[Red Dwarf|Dave Lister]] frequently talks about writing Michelin Guides or similar about various settings, resulting in ''Legion'' getting a psycho rating of "four and a half chainsaws, maybe five". Rimmer suggests that the G-Tower from The Tank in series 8 probably gets "the full five slop-out buckets" in the guide to Penal Hell-Holes.
 
=== [[Video Games]] ===
* ''[[X-Play]]'' regularly gives its review scores nonsensical values, usually related to the game being reviewed, somehow.
 
=== [[Web Original]] ===
* ''Inverted'' by [[Desu Des Brigade|JesuOtaku]]. She normally scores things with some sort of strange unit out of 4 (i.e., ''[[Baccano!]]'' got "three [[Pulling Themselves Together|and a half]] [[Fingore|de-fingerings]]" and ''[[Princess Tutu]]'' got "four characters who [[Screw Destiny|just won't do what they're told]]"), but ''[[Now and Then, Here and There]]'' was so depressing she couldn't bring herself to make fun of it and just used stars.
* In the words of [[Proton Jon]]: [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oO9A4meUe1Q#t=9m44s I have to give this... four Captain Falcons driving Sonic like he was an F-Zero car out of five.]
** Another ROM hack he gave "Four [[Viewtiful Joe|Henshin A-Go-Gos]] out of five".
* In one of the "Teen Girl Squad" shorts on ''[[Homestar Runner]]'', one girl's attempt at diving [[Makes Just as Much Sense in Context|into the mouth of a live lion]] is rated at "3 noses?"
* [[Jon TronJonTron|I give]] [[Donkey Kong Country Returns]] [[Jon TronJonTron|ten golden bananas plus out of]] [[Shigeru Miyamoto]].
 
==== Type 3 -- On a scale of 1-5: [[Precision F-Strike|Up Yours.]] ====
=== [[Anime]] and [[Manga]] ===
* Zac Bertschy from ''Anime News Network'' is infamous for these during the annual season previews, especially harem comedies and ecchi shows. He gave the first episode of ''[[Queen's Blade]]'' an animated gif of a smiley face shooting itself in the head out of 5. ''[[Kiss X SisKiss×Sis]]'' got a Picard facepalm instead of a rating. ''[[Infinite Stratos]]'' got a rating of "quiet I am trying to nap here", a preview that cut off into ZZZZZZZZ halfway through, and [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OTI7cmwwuC0 a video of a cute kitten] as a better alternative for something to watch. Also provides an example of Type 1: Zac sarcastically gave [[Sengoku Collection]] a 10 out of 5.
* Hope Chapman aka [[Jesu OtakuJesuOtaku]] gave ''[[Oniichan no Koto Nanka Zenzen Suki Janain Dakara ne!!|Oniichan no Koto Nanka Zenzen Suki Ja Nai N Dakara Ne]]'' a "GTFO" rating in ANN season previews. The second season of ''[[Strike Witches]]'' was given a shrug.
 
=== [[Anime]]Fan and [[MangaWorks]] ===
* A mixed type 2/3 combined with a type B of [[On a Scale From One To Ten]] can be found in this passage from chapter 73 of the ''[[Harry Potter]]'' fic ''[[The Arithmancer|Lady Archimedes]]'':
* Zac Bertschy from ''Anime News Network'' is infamous for these during the annual season previews, especially harem comedies and ecchi shows. He gave the first episode of ''[[Queen's Blade]]'' an animated gif of a smiley face shooting itself in the head out of 5. ''[[Kiss X Sis]]'' got a Picard facepalm instead of a rating. ''[[Infinite Stratos]]'' got a rating of "quiet I am trying to nap here", a preview that cut off into ZZZZZZZZ halfway through, and [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OTI7cmwwuC0 a video of a cute kitten] as a better alternative for something to watch. Also provides an example of Type 1: Zac sarcastically gave [[Sengoku Collection]] a 10 out of 5.
{{quote|"So on a scale of one to whatever it was you did to Umbridge, how horrifying is this going to be?" George said.
* Hope Chapman aka [[Jesu Otaku]] gave ''[[Oniichan no Koto Nanka Zenzen Suki Janain Dakara ne!!|Oniichan no Koto Nanka Zenzen Suki Ja Nai N Dakara Ne]]'' a "GTFO" rating in ANN season previews. The second season of ''[[Strike Witches]]'' was given a shrug.
Hermione looked over the rune setup one last time. "I'd say somewhere between Inferius and what Filch and Mrs. Norris get up to in their spare time," she replied.}}
 
=== [[Film]] ===
* CHUD.com's infamous "Fuck You Out of 10" review of the ''[[Halloween (film)|Halloween]]'' remake
* Dread Central reviewer Scott Foy's now trademark "FUCK THIS MOVIE" rating.
Line 138 ⟶ 155:
*** ^ To those wondering how this video review is significant- {{spoiler|Spill's video reviews are usually 4-5 minutes long and have the profanity spoken by the reviewers censored. The review (of [[Vampires Suck]]) is only ''44 seconds long'', consisting only of a clip from the film, which then cuts to a disgusted Korey staring blankly at the camera for several seconds before issuing his "Fuck You" rating, which this time goes ''uncensored.''}}
* Victoria Jackson's tenure on ''[[Saturday Night Live]]'' in the late 1980s shaded into this trope. Her rating scale was "4: Pretty good. 3: Best movie ever. 2: Worst movie ever. 1: Pretty good."
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20160505225234/http://www.mutantreviewers.com/rfireflies.html Sue] at ''Mutant Reviewers from Hell'' gave ''[[Grave of the Fireflies]]'' a rating of '''GAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH!!!!!!!!'''
* [[Phelous]], a reviewer of bad horror movies from [[That Guy With The Glasses]], described ''[[A Serbian Film]]'' as the worst thing he's ever watched. And he's watched movies like ''[[Birdemic]]'' and ''Five Across The Eyes''.
 
=== [[Literature]] ===
* ''[[Smart Bitches Trashy Books]]'' has a grade of "DNF", for books they Did Not Finish.
 
=== [[Music]] ===
* [[Pitchfork]] gave Jet's ''Shine On'' the rating "[http://pitchfork.com/reviews/albums/9464-shine-on/ video of a monkey drinking its own piss]".
** Their rating of [[Radiohead]]'s ''In Rainbows'' seemed like this: instead of a score, there was an input box for users to submit scores (a reference to the band's "pay what you feel like" distribution method for this album). However, upon entering a score, the editor's score (9.3 out of 10) became visible. However, after a site redesign, only the reviewer's score remains.
** They gave ''Do You Like Rock Music?'', the second album by English rockers British Sea Power, the rating of [[U2]].
* Cokemachineglow's alleged review of [[Starflyer 59]]'s ''Dial M'' (which began with the reviewer admitting that they could not objectively review the album, and immediately derailed into a rage-filled rant against [[Christian Rock]]) gave the album a score of "†%".
* ''Terrorizer'' magazine gave [[Sunn O)))|SunnO)))]]'s most recent album ''Monoliths and Dimensions'' the rating O))). They actually intended this as a compliment, however, awarding it a glowing review.
 
=== [[Professional Wrestling]] ===
* Bryan Alvarez described the [[N Wo]] Souled Out Pay-Per-View from 1997 as "twenty asses."
 
=== [[Video Games]] ===
* Sure, the rating scale of ''[[Screw AttackScrewAttack]]'s VGR'' show is pretty idiosyncratic in itself ("Buy It", "Rent It" and "F it"), but they still do occasionally play with the scale for certain games. For example, ''[[Modern Warfare]] 2'' was given a "rent it, just never return it" in protest of [[Activision|Activisions]]'s infamous price hike they demanded for that game.
* During his stint at ''Electronic Gaming Monthly'' reviewing horrible games, [[Seanbaby]] once gave a ''Trolls'' game a score of "a picture of a Troll riding a Hotdog."
* Highly divisive [[Shmup]] [[Space Giraffe]] received what [[Wikipedia]] describes as an 'unusual' rating of "Holy crap this is awesome hell yes / 10" from a review on [[Angry Gamer]].
* A variant in ''[[Touhou|The Grimoire of Marisa]]'', wherein Marisa rates and offers her opinions on some of the many spellcards in the series. Marisa's rating scale itself is fairly normal, giving the spellcard a certain number of stars based on her perceived difficulty level. However, she sometimes breaks the "difficulty level" boundary and rates some by "Show-Off Level," "Temperature," "Believability," "Volume," and "Whimsicalness."
* [[Jon TronJonTron]] has given scores that do not make sense at all, such as an A/5 for Sonic Colors and 6 Golden Bananas+/Shigeru Miyamoto.
 
=== [[Web Original]] ===
* "Horribifuckus", courtesy of [[The Nostalgia Critic]].
** He also declared ''[[Batman and Robin (film)|Batman and Robin]]'' ([[Berserk Button|"A BAT-CREDIT CARD????!!!!!"]]) to be "Supercrapafuckerifficexpialibullshit." [[Mary Poppins|In song]].
* [[Ashens]]' guest Jon Blyth said "If you want me to give it a score, then I give Renegade III this noise: AAAAAWWWWRRRROOOO".
* [[Furcadia]] has a seasonal contest for minigames (called Dreams), and one well-known creator--knowncreator—known as Graphite--experiencedGraphite—experienced a variation of this (as his creations were contest entries, there were no ratings beyond First Place, Second Place, Third Place, etc.).<br />Graphite was sure his creation ColdFusion would win because his creation was so innovative--itinnovative—it was a complete [[Interface Screw]] that didn't resemble Furcadia at all in either appearance or gameplay.<br />[[Assumed Win|Unfortunately, this meant the judges had no idea how to rank it, and so placed it in a category all its own.]] To quote Graphite, [https://web.archive.org/web/20120514112759/http://www.bottledindigo.com/furcadia/contests.php#coldfusion "This dream was in fact so innovative that the judges decided to create a special category for my dream alone in which I ended up getting first place, last place, and every place in-between."]<br />The judges did agree that the dream was [[So Cool Its Awesome]] and awarded Graphite handsomely for essentially taking DragonSpeak and Patching [[Up to Eleven]] and essentially turning Furcadia into a game of Atomica. To quote Felorin (one of Furcadias Moderators), "This dream is going to receive a special Puzzling, Mind-boggling, Patching and DragonSpeak Mastering Trickster award of Triwings for Life and a dozen Purple Roses. (Whew that's a mouthful!)"<br />Sadly, every update made to Furcadia since then [[Game Breaker|makes the dream less and less compatable.]]
* In [[Something Awful]]'s ROM Pit, games are normally rated from zero to negative fifty. The game ''Werewolf: The Last Warrior'', however, was simply rated [[Atomic F-Bomb|FUCK]] '''[[Atomic F-Bomb|MEeeeeeee]]'''.
 
==== Type 4 -- On a scale of 1-5: [[Flat What|What.]] ====
=== AniimeAnime ===
 
== Aniime ==
* Zac Bertschy of Anime News Network gave the first episode of ''Upotte!!'' a rating of "WHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAT"
 
=== [[Comic Books]] ===
* Paul O'Brien of ''The X-Axis'' picked up ''[[Quantum and Woody]]'' #32, on the assumption that a relaunch of a title, which had as its gimmick that stuff had happened in all the unpublished issues since the cancellation, would be a great out-of-context jumping-on point. He was wrong, and rated it [https://web.archive.org/web/20110810231657/http://www.esoterica.demon.co.uk/reviews/190999.html#quantum n/a], on the basis that he simply couldn't judge what someone who knew what the hell was going on might get out of it.
 
=== [[Music]] ===
* Mixed with Type 2 in Jon Savage's review of Nurse With Wound's 1979 LP ''Chance Meeting on a Dissecting Table of a Sewing Machine and an Umbrella'' for ''Sounds'' magazine, in which he gave the album "????? out of five" instead of the usual five stars (he couldn't decide whether it was "pure genius" or "sheer nonsense").
* Similarly, Pitchfork's [http://pitchfork.com/reviews/albums/6383-relaxation-of-the-asshole/ review] of Robert Pollard's ''Relaxation Of The Asshole'' gave it both a 0.0 ''and'' a 10.0.
 
=== [[Video Games]] ===
* ''[[NGamer]]'' gave ??% to ''[[Bakushow]]'' (aka ''LOL''), on the grounds that its score depends ''entirely'' on what the player makes of it.
** [[Wario Ware DIY]] got 100%, as the game itself is one ''of making games''. The thinking was that [[NGamer]] made all the games, and [[NGamer]] is infalliable. Therefore, [[NGamer]]'s games must be perfect.
Line 186 ⟶ 202:
** Similarly, the UK ''Nintendo Official Magazine'' gave a blank space where the percentage score traditionally was for [[Phantasy Star Online|Phantasy Star Online Episode III: C.A.R.D. Revolution.]] The review essentially degenerated into a series of screenshots of humerous quotes sent to random online opponents.
* [[PC Gamer]] UK once gave a terrible University management game XX% and the review was written as a multiple choice exam so the reader could choose the final score. The highest possible was no more that 10% and the lowest was a flat 0.
* When TOM from [[Toonami]] reviewed ''Dropship: United Peace Force'' for the [[Play StationPlayStation]] 2 the game game received a "?" rating. Tom had no idea how to rate the game since he could never get past the sixth level. This was accompanied by repeated footage of TOM losing on that level.
* Equestria Gaming has handed out "Ungradeable -- ??/10" ratings on occasion.
* In a case of it being this trope or [[Readings Are Off the Scale]], ''[[Touhou|Symposium of Post-mysticism]]'''s author Akyuu gives ratings for friendliness and power. Unlike ''Perfect Memento in Strict Sense'', which had definite ratings, she actually gives out "Unknown" ratings for when she cannot define the character. Reiuji Utsuho is a unique case: ''both areas'' are rated as "Unknown".
 
==== Type 5--On a scale of 1-5: [["No. Just... No" Reaction|No. Just no.]] ====
 
==== Type 5 -- On a scale of 1-5: [["No. Just... No" Reaction|No. Just no.]] ====
== [[Comics]] ==
=== [[Comic Books]] ===
* ''The X-Axis'' again: Paul didn't give a rating to the 2004 relaunch of ''[[X-Force]]'', holding that judging its quality by any normal standard was beside the point - it was exactly what you'd expect a relaunch of ''[[X-Force]]'' by [[Rob Liefeld]] to be like and therefore, presumably, the people who bought it did so because that's what they wanted (whether to make fun of it or because they were genuinely fans of the [[Rob Liefeld]] style).
* [[Atop the Fourth Wall|Linkara]] refusesrefused to review ''[[One More Day]]'' for years, claiming it's so bad it doesndidn't even deserve a review. He eventually relented (for his 200th episode, mind), but his opinion of it went even lower.
 
=== [[Film]] ===
* [[Roger Ebert]] does this occasionally:
** From [https://web.archive.org/web/20110609183343/http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/19970411/REVIEWS/704110304/1023%2F19970411%2FREVIEWS%2F704110304%2F1023 his review] of ''[[Pink Flamingos]]'':
{{quote| '''Ebert''': "Note: I am not giving a star rating to ''[[Pink Flamingos]],'' because stars simply seem not to apply. It should be considered not as a film but as a fact, or perhaps as an object. "}}
** In [https://web.archive.org/web/20110806120639/http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20100505/REVIEWS/100509982%2F20100505%2FREVIEWS%2F100509982 his review] of ''[[The Human Centipede]]'', he was more explicit in his refusal:
{{quote| '''Ebert''': I am required to award stars to movies I review. This time, I refuse to do it. The star rating system is unsuited to this film. Is the movie good? Is it bad? Does it matter? It is what it is and occupies a world [[Stealth Pun|where the stars don't shine]].}}
** He also refused to give stars to ''[[I Spit on Your Grave]]'' (both the original and remake).
* There was a review of one of the ''[[Toxic Avenger]]'' movies that rated it "Stars? Who needs stars?"
* A fairly positive example: the website [http://www.1000misspenthours.com/index.html 1000 Misspent Hours and Counting] will not give star reviews to movies that either predate the concept of film-making (Georges Melieres's "stunt films") or are not in any state to be objectively reviewed (the stills-based "reconstruction" of the legendarily-lost ''London After Midnight''). These films are still reviewed, but their rating is "Not Applicable".
 
=== [[Live-Action TV]] ===
* A good-natured case of this was when [[Sci Fi Debris]] reviewed the ''[[Star Trek: The Next Generation|TNG]]'' episode "Family". While he liked the episode, he refused to rate it because as he put it, the episode consisted entirely of plot threads which in other episodes would've been [[Plot Threads|B plots]].
 
=== [[Music]] ===
* James Wolcott's [http://www.rollingstone.com/music/albumreviews/metal-machine-music-19750814 review] of Lou Reed's ''Metal Machine Music''.
{{quote| What's most distressing is the possibility that ''Metal Machine Music'' isn't so much a knife slash at his detractors as perhaps a blade turned inward. At its very worst this album suggests masochism. He may be, to shift weaponry images, moving to the center of fire so that we critics-as-assassins can make a clean kill. Fine, Lou, go ahead. Just stand there. Don't move, But [sic] damned if I'll squeeze the trigger.}}
 
=== [[Tabletop Games]] ===
* The writer of the tier system for ''[[Dungeons and& Dragons]] 3.5e'' refuses to give the truenamerTruenamer class a rating - due to poorly-written formulas, after the first few levels it can't use its powers at all without extremely heavy [[Min-Maxing]], and even then it's a [[Squishy Wizard]] with worse spells than some [[Magic Knight]] classes.
 
=== [[Video Games]] ===
* ''[[X-Play]]'' refused to rate ''[[Big Rigs Over the Road Racing]]'' because their system only went down to 1, ''[[Epic Fail|which would imply that it was actually a game]]'' -- although—although as mentioned under Type 1, they did not do the same for ''E.T.''. Other games featured in the "games you should never buy" segment, such as Barbie Horse Adventure or Flags (a "flag waving in the wind" simulator), also were not rated.
** Later they said they should've done this for ''[[Pokémon Channel]]'', which, while not bad, is technically not really a game.
* [[Played for Laughs]] by [[Destructoid|Jim Sterling's]] "[http://www.destructoid.com/100-objective-review-final-fantasy-xiii-179178.phtml 100% objective review]" of ''[[Final Fantasy XIII]]''.
Line 227 ⟶ 242:
* Again from ''The Grimoire of Marisa'': Marisa outright refuses to rate the spellcards of Suika and Medicine.
* Kill Screen's review of ''[[Duke Nukem Forever]]'' probably stands as the most extreme example of this; [http://killscreendaily.com/articles/reviews/review-duke-nukem-forever not only did the reviewer refuse to give a score, the entire site decided not to give out scores] ''ever again''.
{{quote| "We didn’t think it would be possible for a single terrible game to change our entire scoring system. Congratulations, Duke, you’ve broken us."}}
 
=== [[Western Animation]] ===
* ''[[Beavis and Butthead]]'' usually commented on music videos, but in two cases ([[Music/Milli Vanilli|Milli Vanilli]] and [[Vanilla Ice]]), they just stared in silent horror for a while before changing the channel.
** A positive variation occurred when they spent an entire [[Music/Ramones|Ramones]] video headbanging.
** Another video was so dull and cliche they simply turned the TV off. [[Overly Long Gag|The home viewers' screen was also black, with no commentary, for the rest of the video-watching segment.]]
 
{{reflist}}
[[Category:{{PAGENAME}}]]
[[Category:Criticism Tropes]]
[[Category:Truth in Television]]
[[Category:Broke the Rating Scale]]