Chewbacca Defense: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m cleanup categories |
Rescuing 1 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.8.5 |
||
(18 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{
[[File:
<!-- Cochran states that Chewbacca is originally from Kashyyyk, but now lives on Endor. The footnote is not necessary. -->
{{quote|'''Isaac''': I don't really understand what's going on, but he just broke down crying. What do you suppose it means, Miria?
'''Miria''': I think it means we won!
|''[[Baccano!]]''}}
A '''Chewbacca Defense''' is part of an argument that has the effect of confusing the opponent so much that they stop arguing with you. If they are too chicken to continue the argument, the point they are trying to argue must be equally as flimsy, right? Right?
The sad part? ''It works''. Not just in media, but in [[Real Life]], too. In fact, most political systems are ''based'' on doing this.
Line 28 ⟶ 29:
Confusing, isn't it?
Compare [[Confusion Fu]], [[Passive-Aggressive Kombat]] and [[Abomination Accusation Attack]]. As the strategy can work very well in conjunction with [[Obfuscating Stupidity]], it's often popular with [[Simple Country Lawyer
{{examples}}▼
▲{{examples|art=the}}
== [[Anime]] and [[Manga]] ==
* Isaac and Miria from ''[[Baccano!]]''. The argument referenced in the quote? ''It wasn't even an argument at all'', but rather a [[Shrinking Violet]] trying to introduce himself to them.
* In ''[[Ghost in the Shell: Stand Alone Complex]]'', The [[Amoral Attorney]] tries to get his cyborg client off for murdering his girlfriend by trying to have the trial focus on the supposed (read: completely fabricated) technophobic beliefs of the officer who shot him.
==
* Parodied in ''[[Asterix]] and the Laurel Wreath'', where both opposing lawyers on a case attempt to use the ''same'' Chewbacca Defence.
* In ''[[Youngblood: Judgment Day]]'', defense attorney Skipper calls several witnesses to testify about a seemingly irrelevant detail of Riptide's murder (a book missing from her shelf), completely derailing the trial. At first, this seems like a textbook Chewbacca Defense, but the alternate sequence of events he proposes, that the theft of the book was the real motive for the murder and the perpetrator was {{spoiler|Youngblood teammate Sentinel}} actually turns out to be ''true''.
▲== [[Fanfic]] ==
* ''[[The Vinyl Scratch Tapes]]'':
{{quote|'''Octavia:''' ''What do solving mysteries have to do with music anyway?''
Line 47:
'''Vinyl:''' ''Hurray, that means I win by default!'' }}
== [[Film]] ==▼
▲== Film ==
* ''[[Thank You for Smoking]]'' provides an excellent example of this trope when the protagonist, a pro-tobacco lobbyist, demonstrates this debate technique to his son.
{{quote|'''Nick:''' Okay, let's say that you're defending chocolate, and I'm defending vanilla. Now if I were to say to you: 'Vanilla is the best flavor of ice cream', you'd say:
Line 66 ⟶ 65:
** To top it off, the film begins with Naylor cleverly turning around criticism, convincing a juvenile cancer victim and TV talk show audience that in fact it's the cancer victims' advocate who's selling death, as the tobacco industry wants people alive to smoke while the advocates need them for their work. [[Mind Screw]].
** Plus when Joey has to write an essay on what's best about America, Nick replies "Our endless appeals system" with almost knee-jerk response time.
* Kronk's [[Good Angel, Bad Angel|shoulder devil]] in ''[[The Emperor's
{{quote|'''Shoulder Devil:''' Reason number two: Look what I can do: ''**Does a one-handed handstand**''
'''Kronk:''' But... What does that have to do with-
Line 77 ⟶ 76:
* Surprisingly enough, it actually happened to ''[[Star Wars]]'' with Chewbacca himself. It's in the special features of the DVD set. When [[George Lucas]] proved too difficult for [[Executive Meddling|the executives to meddle with]] (thanks to Alan Ladd, Jr.), they turned to a different approach: "But the Wookiee has no pants!" knowing that changing that would require re-shooting a ''lot'' of scenes, which would put Lucas severely over budget. Thankfully, that didn't work either.
== [[Literature]] ==
* The entire purpose of Newspeak grammar B in ''[[Nineteen Eighty-Four
* In ''[[Gormenghast]]'', Steerpike uses this method to manipulate two mentally retarded sisters into doing his bidding and keeping quiet about it- after all, he must know what he's talking about if he uses so many long words...
* The [[Tom Clancy]] novel ''[[Executive Orders]]'' has politically-inexperienced President Jack Ryan questioned about abortion. He states that he's pro-life, but the decision should be left in the hands of the Senate. After he gets offstage, his Chief of Staff angrily points out that he just alienated the conservatives ''and'' the liberals; the former probably think he's using the Senate as an excuse, and the latter think the Senate is the only thing keeping him from rampaging all over a woman's right to choose. This is a rare example of an ''unintentional'' Chewie Defense (the CoS, incidentally, mentions that he himself is pro-choice).
Line 84 ⟶ 83:
{{quote|Senator Strom Thurmond (R-SC) set the record for longest filibuster with his 24-hour, 18-minute speech railing against a civil rights bill. Thurmond's oration obliterated the previous filibuster record, a 13-hour description by Daniel Webster of the massive dump he just took.}}
== [[Live-Action TV]] ==▼
▲== Live-Action TV ==
* On ''[[Community]]'' this is [[Amoral Attorney]] Jeff Winger's go to strategy as a lawyer. He particularly seems to like invoking 9/11. Subverted when he {{spoiler|uses it in Debate: his team loses, 50-8 (and the 8 were to Annie).}}
* The "Chosen" episode of ''[[Law &
* In ''[[The Big Bang Theory]]'', Sheldon proves an exemplar of this. He gets into an argument with Stuart, the comic book store manager (about which Robin would make a better replacement Batman). They argue for hours, until Stuart says that he's tired of it and going home. They have this exchange:
{{quote|'''Sheldon:''' Then I win.
Line 114 ⟶ 112:
* ''The [[Blackadder]]'' episode "Witchsmeller Pursivent". The evidence that Edmund is a witch includes that he was heard speaking to his cat, and that he feeds his horse carrots. [[It Makes Just As Much Sense in Context]].
== [[Radio]] ==▼
▲== Radio ==
* From ''[[The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy]]'' (original radio show):
{{quote|'''Zaphod:''' What are they? Clinically thick?
'''Ford:''' I think they're very clever; they're trying to confuse us to death. }}
== Stand Up Comedy ==
* Comedian [[Ron White]] joked about this once.
{{quote|'''Ron White:''' "I got kicked off the high school debate team for saying "Yeah?! Well, '''fuck you'''!!" I thought I had won. The other kid was speechless. I thought that was what we were tryin' to do."}}
== Theater ==
Line 130 ⟶ 125:
** This particular case was also a bit unethical of Cicero, as the personal attacks he used to such great effect were on the sister of Publius Clodius Pulcher; Clodius and Cicero hated each other, so it wasn't at all difficult for Cicero to lambast the Clodii. Additionally, Clodius and some of his family did not have the most savory reputation at the time, so the personal attacks were effective as an appeal to existing prejudices more than to justice.
* The musical ''[[Chicago]]'' has a song titled Razzle Dazzle that explains the trope quite thoroughly. It includes the line, "How can they see [the truth] with sequins in their eyes?"
* In the court scene of ''[[Oklahoma!]]'', about Curly not being taken to the Police:
{{quote|'''Man:''' I feel funny about this! I feel funny!
'''Aunt Eller:''' You’ll feel funny when I tell your wife you’re carrying on with another woman.
Line 136 ⟶ 131:
'''Aunt Eller:''' Maybe not, but you’ll sure feel funny when I tell your wife you are. }}
== [[Video Games]] ==▼
▲== Video Games ==
* ''[[Sengoku Basara]]'': "[[Memetic Mutation|'My horse is a motorbike. Your argument is invalid.']]"
* ''[[Phoenix Wright]]'' is accused of doing this in the second game's final case by {{spoiler|his long lost rival, Edgeworth.}} It's arguable that Phoenix did so in that case to [[We Need a Distraction|stall for time]], as well as in the third case of the third game {{spoiler|in order to make the guilty party point out a detail of a piece of incriminating evidence introduced for the first time a few minutes ago, when he was out of the room - [[I Never Said It Was Poison|something he couldn't have known unless he was the killer]].}}
Line 143 ⟶ 137:
*** It's more than just the fact that {{spoiler|Apollo threatens to call a witness}}. The true killer {{spoiler|had to be a Borginian cocoon smuggler as was previously proven. So, Apollo says that if the witness admits he's a smuggler, thus proving that Daryan is his accomplice, it in turn decisively proves that the only one who could be the killer is Daryan himself, as he is the only smuggler with no alibi for the murder}}. On top of this, considering that {{spoiler|Borginian cocoon smuggling is punished with the death sentence in Borginia, if he admits he smuggled the cocoons during the current trial, the duty of punishment would fall on the American (Japanese in original version) courts instead of those of Borginia, meaning he would not be killed. So in other words, the killer must testify about his crimes, otherwise he will die, which means that there is no escape for the true killer.}}
* In ''[[Escape from Monkey Island]]'', amoral real-estate developer Ozzie Mandrill nearly succeeds in taking over the Caribbean with this method. All pirate disputes are settled with Insult Swordfighting and other insult-based games, but no one can understand Ozzie's Australian slang. Since no one who fights Ozzie can come up with the counter to his insults, he wins by default.
* Used offensively in ''[[Umineko no Naku Koro ni]]'' during the third arc. Battler has to prove that magic wasn't used to do something and rather than preparing actual logical arguments he just rushes on ahead and declares his victory before his opponent has any idea how the logic game even works. {{spoiler|She turns out to be really good at it when she's given a chance to think, however.}}
== Webcomics ==
Line 157 ⟶ 147:
*** Which generally translates to "if you are affirmative, and you fail to respond to an argument, no matter how stupid it is, the negative wins one of the 5 major points, and thus the debate." Many a person has won a debate with a Chewbacca Defense. Depending on the judge, calling the other person out on their defense may or may not help.
*** That's actually not winning, and they're awarding someone falsely when that happens. It's possible for a judge/host/whatever to not know anything about arguing.
* [http://mediumlarge.files.wordpress.com/2008/07/medlarge371.jpg This strip] from the webcomic ''[[Medium Large]]''.
* In [http://www.giantitp.com/comics/oots0280.html strip #280] of ''[[The Order of the Stick]]'', one of the lawyers planned a Chewbacca Defense using a comically oversized boot, despite the fact that he was a part of the prosecution.
* Mentioned in [http://www.livingwithinsanity.com/index/?p=185 this] ''[[Living With Insanity]]'' strip.
* In [https://web.archive.org/web/20140109055022/http://somethingpositive.net/sp10302003.shtml this] ''[[Something
* Not even used for any real purpose, but effective nonetheless in [http://www.vexxarr.com/archive.php?seldate=012312 this] ''[[Vexxarr]]'' comic.
== [[Web Original]] ==▼
▲== Web Original ==
* [[The Nostalgia Critic]] review of ''[[Suburban Commando]]'' suggests using the line "I was '''FROZEN''' today!" randomly in an argument to "watch what happens". He demonstrates it by acting out an argument with himself, in which the person who is yelled at with the line stares with a confused and slightly horrified look before slowly backing out of the room.
* Most of the examples [
** The list could itself be perceived as a straight example when someone tries to use it as proof that God does not exist.
*** That is actually on the list.
Line 172 ⟶ 161:
** [[Department of Redundancy Department|"Argument From Argumentation,"]] where one arguer just says God exists over and over until the opponent leaves, is practically a template for all the others. The opponent's arguments, since they're ignored anyway, are all written as "[Atheist's counterargument]."
* Pretty much any forum out there on the internet (politics, religion, video games, etc.) will see this happen at some point. Or at many points. [[Opinion Myopia|If someone believes they are right, they will fight to the death to make other forum members know that his opponent is dead wrong.]] Saying something like "I have to go to bed" or "I have to take a shower now" usually makes the opposition think they won by default because you supposedly "chickened out" or "are admitting defeat", even though you may really mean to leave to do something else more important. But hey, a [[Flame War]] is [[Serious Business]]!
** Of course, if the one
** A lot of internet discussions will also end the moment someone calls the opposing side a [[Godwin's Law|Nazi]], racist, homophobe, sexist or some other derogatory name. It's designed to cut off any further communication because the opponent certainly doesn't want to be seen in that light. And let's not forget ''I don't wish to discuss this any further''.
*** Godwin's Law states that as any debate rages on, the probability of one side bringing up Hitler gets closer and closer to one. Between reasonable, intelligent people who know what they're talking about? Not a problem. On the Internet, which is practically the homeland of insane retards who have no clue about what they're talking about? Guaranteed. The "Hitler rule," a universal Internet rule established based on Godwin's Law, dictates that once the Godwin Point has been reached, the person who referenced Hitler or the Nazis has automatically lost the debate and there is to be no further discussion on the subject. A corollary to the rule, incidentally, holds that invoking Godwin's Law intentionally because you're sick of debating never works.
*** It should be noted that the Hitler Rule itself also fits nicely into the category of a
**** It's a subset of "stopped arguing meaningfully and dived into nonsense" rule, formalized in more generic form by [[Scott Adams]] ([https://web.archive.org/web/20170827021705/http://blog.dilbert.com/post/160696999931/how-to-know-you-won-a-political-debate-on-the on his blog]):
* [http://yourargumentisinvalid.com/ This site] is dedicated to collecting [[Image Macro|image macros]] of these.▼
{{quote|That’s essentially a white flag that says, “I have no logical argument, so I will say something ridiculous and act as though it is not.” }}
▲* [https://web.archive.org/web/20111127141049/http://yourargumentisinvalid.com/ This site] is dedicated to collecting [[Image Macro|image macros]] of these.
* The comedy styling of IMAO are almost all based around this (such as nuking the moon for world peace).
* This is how to win an edit war on [[The Other Wiki]], where the content is often controlled not by those with the more accurate information but by those with the strongest opinions.
Line 182 ⟶ 173:
{{quote|2006-04-29: bans two editors forever for making comments supporting Brandt, and then an hour later, now that they are unable to respond, accuses them of being the same person}}
* This was discussed in a video of ''[[Andrew Klavan on the Culture]]'' where the opposing argument can simply be defeated by telling them to shut up as to stopping them from speaking out their point of view.
* ''[[Cracked.com]]''{{'}}s take on [http://www.cracked.com/video_18297_stuff-that-must-have-happened-pitching-mt.-rushmore.html how Mt. Rushmore got approval] had the proponent of carving
== [[Western Animation]] ==
* The trope name comes from the ''[[South Park]]'' episode "Chef Aid". In this episode, there was a parody of Johnnie Cochran who - bah, [http://www.southparkstudios.com/clips/103454/the-chewbacca-defense just see for yourself]. It makes even less sense if you consider the Chewbacca doesn't live on Endor, which isn't even a planet, but a moon.
* In an episode of ''[[Justice League]]'', when the [[Green Lantern]] is accused of a crime, [[The Flash]] becomes his attorney. He doesn't have a clue what to use to turn the case around, so he uses a Chewbacca defense. He ends his speech with "If the ring wasn't lit, you must acquit!" The result being both of them getting sentenced to death.
Line 196 ⟶ 186:
* Though this trope doesn't really happen in the "Apprentice Games" episode of ''[[Chowder]]'' (unless you count the awkward singing that drives everyone the hell out of the stadium) it is outright explained by Mung Dal in these words: "Winning isn't about being the best. It's about being so incredibly bad that no one can ignore you!"
* ''[[Family Guy]]'': Adam West uses this when Lois is running against him for mayor. Lois then wins the election by taking Brian's advice to do the same thing (she answers every question with "9/11").
{{quote| '''Lois:''' ''Nine...''
''(audience inhales)
'''Lois:''' Eleven!
''{audience cheers)'' }}
* A recent episode of ''[[The Simpsons]]'' involved Lisa joining the school's debate team. In her first debate, her opponent, a brunette girl, immediately circumvents the subject for debate in favor of breaking down Lisa's argument [[Completely Missing the Point|on the grounds that Lisa is a]] [[Dumb Blonde]]. Much to the chagrin of anyone with half a brain, [[Insane Troll Logic|it works]].
== [[Real Life]] ==▼
▲== Real Life ==
* [[wikipedia:Sophism|The Sophists of Ancient Greece]], making this [[Older Than Feudalism]].
** [[Straw Man|As described by their main opponents in Greek Philosophy]]. [[Missing Episode|What they actually thought is gone]].
Line 209 ⟶ 198:
* Apocryphally, famous mathematician Euler used one of these as a way of shutting up Diderot, an atheist who was converting local people away from God. They had an actual public debate, and Euler's first argument was to say "[[E=MC Hammer|(a + b^n)/n = x]], therefore God exists. Respond!" Diderot [[Writers Cannot Do Math|had no idea what to say]], and ended up leaving.
** This is [http://www.cs.uwaterloo.ca/~shallit/euler.html almost certainly untrue], however - Diderot was actually a very good mathematician and Euler was too thoughtful to use such an asinine tactic.
* The [[Trope Namer]] from ''[[South Park]]'' was based on Johnnie Cochran's defense of [[O.J. Simpson]], which succeeded largely due to the ignorance of the jury and carelessness of the prosecution. First by focusing the jury on their confusion and uncertainty of what DNA is and how DNA testing really works, and turning that into "reasonable doubt". Second by portraying O.J. as the unjust black victim of white racism via the whole Mark Fuhrman debacle. Third, by using this to hold O.J. out as a prominent member of the black community, which he wasn't. Fourth by making it seem as though the bloody leather gloves did not fit Simpson's hands, when it fact he was putting them on incorrectly.
** Incidentally, in his book ''To be a Trial Lawyer,'' F. Lee Bailey wrote disapprovingly that if a client is guilty, then a lawyer's best bet is to get the most unintelligent jury possible.
*** He also wrote that a lawyer should never ask a witness a question, to which the lawyer doesn't know the answer (also one of [[Rumpole]]'s maxims) ... which is quite telling in regards to the fact that he had evidence about the Mark Furhman "N-word" issue, and was unethically setting him up for an
* High school and college debate in the US can get ''extremely'' convoluted. Since the point of competitive debate is not just to argue about a topic, but to defeat your opponent, most debate strategy is built around trying to trip up the other side. As a result, some coaches feel that implausible and goofy arguments are ''better'', since it forces the other side to waste time trying to respond. If they ignore the argument, you can claim that you won the point since they didn't respond properly. The classic example is if you're arguing against a resolution, you try to prove that their plan will eventually lead to nuclear war, even if it's about something like homelessness or health care. Sometimes debaters will respond to an argument like that by agreeing that it will cause nuclear war, but that nuclear war is a ''good'' thing. The "correct" way to respond to it is to refute it with specific evidence in your debate file, taking advantage of your ability to speak last. Another method is to not even argue about the topic but object to your opponent's argument on philosophical grounds (e.g. accuse them of being racist or sexist). Depending on the judge, calling them out on their rule abusing Chewbacca Defense may or may not result in it getting dismissed. * "Derailing for Dummies" outlines steps to win any argument by derailing it with a Chewbacca Defense. On the other hand, people who have read the website can also try to win arguments by accusing any counterargument to their point of being "derailment."
** Averted in the UK, which uses the "British Parliamentary" and "World Schools" formats, where using a Chewbacca defense can and will get you marked down heavily by the judge.
Line 219 ⟶ 208:
** '''Especially''' when it comes to the [[Flame Bait|divisive topics]].
* Politicians.
** The filibuster in the United States Senate. Under this rule 60 out of 100 votes are needed to stop debate on a bill, but passing it requires only 50. If 60 senators don't agree to cut off debate, any senator can extend the "debate" as long as they can stand and speak on the floor. Some filibusters are done with actual talk about the bill itself (such as [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ZLYwSPbNXo Rand Paul's 10 hour talk against renewing the Patriot Act]) hoping to persuade others to oppose the bill. Most filibusters however consist of Senators speaking about something completely irrelevant, like reciting the Bible or phone book, to fill as much time as possible hoping to stall till the next recess or until supporters give up on trying to pass it.
*** Mike Lee's stand against the ill thought out "Green New Deal" (essentially banning all kind of motor vehicle and cow) [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sK27NZon11w treats the proposal with the "seriousness it deserves", meaning none].
* The internet.
* In some religiously skeptical communities, this kind of argument is also known as a [http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop Gish Gallop]; named after Creationist, biochemist, and professional debater Duane Gish, who is known to be a fan of using the Chewbacca Defense against atheists. His typical method of winning debates is making sure he is the first to speak and then delivering a wide load of pseudo-scientific nonsense his opponent couldn't possibly have time to address individually, claiming a win if as few as one of his arguments remains unchallenged.
Line 226 ⟶ 217:
{{reflist}}
[[Category:Absurdity Ascendant]]
[[Category:
[[Category:The Courtroom Index]]
[[Category:Dirty Social Tricks]]
▲[[Category:Truth in Television]]
[[Category:Logical Fallacies]]
[[Category:
[[Category:
[[Category:Word Salad Tropes]]
|