Classical Anti-Hero: Difference between revisions

m
Mass update links
m (remove unneccessary quote box template)
m (Mass update links)
Line 2:
[[File:spideysad_1127.jpg|link=Spider-Man|frame|There there, Peter.]]
 
Nowadays, an [[Anti -Hero]] is usually thought of as a [[Badass]], [[Silly Rabbit, Idealism Is for Kids|bitter]], [[Hates Everyone Equally|misanthropic]], [[Blood Knight|violent]], [[Sociopathic Hero|sociopathic]], angry person (see [[Nineties Anti Hero]]). However, this is actually a recent invention. For much of history, the term ''antihero'' referred to a character type that is in many ways the opposite of this.
 
In [[Classical Mythology]] and earlier mythology, the hero tended to be a [[Canon Sue|dashing, confident, stoic, intelligent, highly capable fighter and commander with few, if any, flaws]]. The classical antihero, as the title suggests, is the inversion of this. Where the hero is confident, the antihero is plagued by self-doubt. Where the hero is a respected fighter, the antihero is mediocre at best. Where the hero gets all the ladies, the antihero can't even get the time of day.
Line 10:
As time has gone on, this portrayal has become increasingly popular, as readers enjoy the increased depth of story that comes from a flawed and conflicted character. Hence, the classical antihero has to some extent replaced the traditional hero in the minds of readers as the idea of what a hero should be. It is nowadays rare to find a hero who does not have at least a little of the classical antihero in him.
 
Stands on the heroic end of the [[Sliding Scale of Anti -Heroes]]. See also [[Punch Clock Hero]]. Compare [[Super Loser]] and [[Tragic Hero]].
----
{{examples|Examples: }}