Dethroning Moment of Suck (Darth Wiki)/Web Original/That Guy With The Glasses: Difference between revisions
Dethroning Moment of Suck (Darth Wiki)/Web Original/That Guy With The Glasses (view source)
Revision as of 14:04, 15 September 2018
, 5 years agoRescuing 1 sources and tagging 0 as dead. #IABot (v2.0beta9)
m (clean up, replaced: Big Lipped Alligator Moment → Non Sequitur Scene) |
(Rescuing 1 sources and tagging 0 as dead. #IABot (v2.0beta9)) |
||
Line 49:
* ignuszwei: His Tron Legacy review is probably his worst video yet: He makes it very clear that he didn't pay attention to the fairly simple plot, couldn't come up with any good explanation for plot holes, doesn't even try to be funny with his ranting raving and facepalming, and preempts any counter-argument by implying that anyone who disagrees with him is a rabid, idiotic fanboy. The majority of the feedback he got proved him wrong: everyone that liked the movie agreed that it wasn't a masterpiece by any stretch of the imagination, but they still enjoyed the movie nonetheless. The tone throughout the video makes it clear that isn't Spoony hilariously ranting for our amusement: this is Noah Antwiller himself trolling everyone and being a dick.
* Manwiththe Plan The last part of his [[Final Fantasy X]] review. Aside from some funny bits like pointing out Seymour's [[Villain Decay]], it was mainly him rushing through the rest of the game while still [[Completely Missing the Point]] on several aspects (Yes Spoony, towards the end the game makes it clear that it's Tidus' story and he will be important to the outcome) only to go into a stupid, unfunny skit resolving the Black Latern Spoony subplot. Tidus' appearance felt like something out of a [[Seltzer and Friedberg]] movie with him shouting things out of context ("This is MY story!" "I'm the star player of the Zanarkand Abes! AH-HA-HA-HA-HA!"), Spoony fights him to give him the "graphic, painful death he deserves" except that he doesn't; Tidus is still alive by the end and Dr Insano just takes him to be tortured in his experiments, and of course the [[Non Sequitur Scene]] with the cloaked pumpkin masked guy dancing around. The resolution for Black Latern Spoony is also very abrupt and unsatisfying.
* Qwertz: During the third session of [[Lord Kat]]'s Wyrmwick campaign (which is part of [[Lord Kat]]'s output for his website), the group faces guards. Jason wanted to give them an animal motif, so he used a random generator and the result he got and went with was the bee. The group then laughed their asses off at that idea. Then Spoony (who didn't participate in the campaign) interrupted them and attacked the players for "taking a shit over Jason's campaign" and defended the bees because "he liked the bee-theme and considers stealing it", "out of all the animals in the US, bees kill the most humans" and he "understands respect for the bee". I mean, what the fuck? First, even if bees do kill people, it doesn't make guards with bee-insignia or whatever less ridiculous, cows kill more people than sharks but you would hardly be intimidated by that. Second, he is well aware of Linkara's "Bee's, my God!" running joke. Third, he makes a shit-ton of bee-jokes in his review of [https://web.archive.org/web/20130809233020/http://spoonyexperiment.com/wicker-man/ The Wicker Man], including lines like ''Ross tells him that he's in the manor of Sister [[Summers Isle]], and that she's expecting him outside...outside, with the horrible, evil bees...''.
* [[Blue Rose 12400]]: His rant on [[Final Fantasy XIV]]. Basically, he was ranting about the tutorial demo and how it affects the rest of the game. I'm sorry, but if all games sucked based on the tutorial, then [[Kingdom Hearts II]] should have flopped.
* fluffything: His written review of ''[[Akira]]'' is a big DMOS for me mostly due to the blatant [[Bias Steamroller]] and research goofs. First of all, he spends over half of the review making fun of the Anime fandom (Say, Spoony, what was that you said about how you hated that Roger Ebert was making fun of video game fans? Hypocrisy much?) and "joking" (in the loosest sense of the word possible) about how "(insert Japanese word here) means (insert "Anime Sux LOL" comment here)". Second, he claims that he didn't bother to read the original Manga to understand what's going on because it's "too long" and complains that the movie was too confusing. Spoony, you do realize you could've just looked up the movie on the internet and gotten useful footnotes on the plot and characters, right? Third, speaking of plot, he overlooks important plot elements (Like that Akira was a human being whose psychic powers went out of control destroying Tokyo in the first place) in favor of a poorly-written summary that sounds like what would happen if one were to watch an episode of [[Dragonball Z]] on fast-forward. If he didn't like the movie, fine. He's entitled to his opinion. But, would it kill him to actually put some effort into his review instead of complaining about something he could've easily learned more about by doing five minutes of research on Wikipedia?
| |||