Fox News Liberal: Difference between revisions

Rescuing 1 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.8
m (update links)
(Rescuing 1 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.8)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1:
{{trope}}
A [['''Fox News Liberal]]''' is a character who allegedly provides political balance in the narrative but who in practice, at best, ends up parroting the [[Golden Mean Fallacy]]. They can be presented as the [[Only Sane Man]] in their party, and their criticisms of said party can also evoke from those in the prevailing party that "See? Even this [[Blatant Lies|die-hard conservative/liberal]] thinks that their party has gone way too far and become way too extreme. *sigh* If only the rest of their party could be as [[You Keep Using That Word|reasonable]] as they are, they wouldn't be in such bad shape". In particularly extreme versions of this trope, the character forsakes their own beliefs as a means of [[Character Development]], claiming their party line has "gone too far".
 
There are some arguable real-life politicians who fall into this (most obviously the Fox News Liberals from which this trope gains its name or counterpart MSNBC Conservatives), but suffice to say, [[Rule of Cautious Editing Judgment]] is in effect.<ref>And of course, even on the most biased show, the "opposition" voices come in several flavors. Sometimes it's a wimp who ends up agreeing with the host, but just as often it's a crazed [[Straw Man]] who makes his whole side look bad. And sometimes it really is an often representative of the other side--but folks on the other side may feel like he ''must'' be a sellout, or why would he be on that show/network in the first place?</ref>
Line 28:
** Arnold Vinick, the Republican presidential nominee in the final season, is so moderate that the real-life Republican party would probably never accept him. He's pro-choice, not at all religious, and in much of the U.S., would be considered closer to a Democrat than a Republican.
*** But justified in that in California, his home state, he would be considered conservative.
** In fact, pretty much any Republican character whom the audience is supposed to like and respect gradually becomes one of these if they're around long enough. One particular exception is Speaker of the House and Acting President Glenallen Walken, who proves to be a competent president and reasonably likable man of integrity despite also being clearly depicted as a conservative Republican and military hawk. However, he was only around for three episodes, it's possible this wasn't intentional and in any case, he was played by John Goodman, which goes a long way.<br />For that matter, nearly everyone who appears on the show and is ''to the left'' of the main characters seems to literally adopt the characteristics that Fox News associates with liberals: they are, almost to a person, shrill, mean-spirited, short-sighted, and egocentric. This is especially notable in any episode dealing with free trade, where opponents of free trade always get portrayed as hypocrites, grandstanders, or idiots. Basically, the door swings both ways: if Aaron Sorkin disagrees with you, you're either a nut or a meanie, and it doesn't matter what side of the political spectrum you fall on.
* The French [[Police Procedural|Police show]] ''P.J'' has Chloé Matthieu, who is a Fox News ''fascist''--she—she starts as a member of a far right Police Syndicate, her uncle ran a election for a far-right party (not named, but probably [[wikipedia:Front National (France)|this]] real life party), she seems to hate anything and anyone having a common point with Arabs, Muslims, human being with dark skin, homosexuals... Yet she manage to become good friend with Muslims and/or black policemen, has a child with a black man, work part time in a lesbian bar, asked a bisexual colleague to help her take care of her child when she has to work late and implicitly admits than most of her opinions are bogus. It can however be seen as character development, since this comes progressively during the show, and losing her prejudices actually makes her a competent cop.
* ''Entertainment Weekly'' editor Mark Harris wrote [http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,20013253,00.html an article] about this, specifically naming Harriet Hayes of ''Studio 60'' and Kitty Walker of ''Brothers and Sisters''.
 
 
== Real Life ==
* The [[Trope Namer]]: Many American liberals feel like most or all liberals who appear on [[Fox News Channel]] fall into this category.<ref>or the other extreme, foam-flecked lunatics who make all the people on their side look bad</ref>. Alan Colmes, formerly of ''Hannity and Colmes'', was usually held up as the prime example. [[Al Franken]], in his book ''Lies (And The Lying Liars Who Tell Them)'', always printed Colmes' name in a tiny font as a reference to this.
* That's the exact same way many American conservatives feel about most or all liberals who appear on MSNBC. Either they're timid and prone to agreeing with the other side (Scarborough), possibly enough to get their overt approval as someone "they should listen to" (Scarborough can fall here), get fired by them (Buchanan), or are handpicked and singled out to make their side look bad, in their point of view. Both sides can potentially be capable of this.
** Pretty much every other liberal who appears on Fox is accused of this at least at times, and likewise conservatives who appear on MSNBC.
Line 41:
* Liberal blogs sometimes disparagingly use the phrase "even-the-liberal" to refer to these people, as in "even the liberal Alice believes [conservative position]."
** Similarly, conservative blogs disparagingly use the phrase "even-the-conservative" to refer to people like this, like "even 'rational conservative' Bob believes [liberal position]."
* A conservative or a liberal Republican who appears on [[CNN]], [[MSNBC]] or [[PBS]] is also called a Very Serious Person (VSP). [https://web.archive.org/web/20180214131632/https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Very_Serious_People This] [[RationalWiki|RationalWiki article]] identifies who these VSPs are, their characteristics and policy positions.
 
{{reflist}}