Furries Are Easier to Draw: Difference between revisions

Rescuing 0 sources and tagging 1 as dead. #IABot (v2.0beta9)
m (Mass update links)
(Rescuing 0 sources and tagging 1 as dead. #IABot (v2.0beta9))
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 2:
{{quote|"''So the owl turns him into a kitten, because he claims they're easier to kill, but I think it's because they're easier to draw.''"|'''[[The Nostalgia Critic]],''' ''[[Rock-a-Doodle]]''}}
 
{{quote|"''He found a formula for drawing [[Who Framed Roger Rabbit?|comic rabbits:]]''<br />
''This formula for drawing comic rabbits [[Money, Dear Boy|paid.]]''<br />
''Till in the end he could not change the tragic habits''<br />
''This formula for drawing comic rabbits made.''"|Animator '''Robert Graves''', "Epitaph of an Unfortunate Animator", quoted by [[Richard Williams]] in ''[[The Animator's Survival Kit]]''.}}
 
A trope primarily seen in [[Web Comics]] and other artistic media. It seems that a lot of comics and cartoons have anthropomorphic animal characters. Possibly more than one work of fiction can justify this by saying, "The artists are themselves [[Furry Fandom|furries]], and this is why the characters are all [[Humanoid Animals|literal Furries]]."
 
The other, more common reason may be this trope.
 
[[Most Writers Are Human|Most Artists Are Humans]], but unfortunately humans are fairly hard to draw. This has a lot to do with the principles behind the [[Uncanny Valley]] theory. We know what people look like. We see them every day. If an artist's human characters look too weird, those characters won't be appealing.
 
But, oddly, there doesn't seem to be much of an [[Uncanny Valley]] equivalent for animals, let alone [[Cartoon Creature|extremely stylized characters]]. After all, there aren't any [[Funny Animal|Furries]] running around in the real world (at least not to our knowledge). This means that there isn't any right or wrong way to draw cartoon animals, so it's impossible to be close but not quite there.
 
Also, it tends to help that while artists who limit themselves to humans are very likely to use [[Only Six Faces]], Furries have several additional traits to help tell each other apart, from fur color to ears, tails, paws -- notpaws—not to mention species. As a result, an artist can easily make a [[Cast of Snowflakes]] just by randomizing each character.
 
Further, while human body language can be on the subtle side (especially if you have trouble drawing people to begin with), animals have lots of features that are easy to use in this regard; tails, ears, whiskers... they all can convey meaning very directly. And since, as above, we are more familiar with human emotions by default, if you make a misstep with animals it isn't as noticeable.
 
In some cases, but not all, this may be due to a [[Lazy Artist]]. Most webcomic artists are amateurs, and thus they do this in their free time. Some of them [[Sturgeon's Law|just can't draw that well]], so they borrow from the more professional [[Furry Comic|Furry Comics]]s as a shortcut. The audience tends to notice the difference in quality. Most art school students run a long, ''long'' gauntlet of figure drawing courses. An appealing human face is indeed one of the hardest damn things in the world to draw -- howeverdraw—however, the rest of said human isn't any harder or easier to draw than any other animal. Many artists go on to create animal characters anyway -- butanyway—but there is a noticeably greater attention to detail from someone who's trained on drawing humans. Furthermore, once you start drawing animals, you understand why you drew so many human figures. We're about as close to a "[[Do-Anything Robot|Do Anything Tetrapod]]" as you can get.
 
A major cause of [[Furry Confusion]], if not handled well.
{{examples}}
== [[Newspaper Comics]] ==
* This is almost certainly why ''Pluggers'' uses furries, since the strip is about Midwestern senior citizens.
* This was the reason stated why German comic artist Peter Puck drew his character ''[[Rudi]]'' as this. Dog snouts are easier than human noses, apparently.
* Played straight by [[Lewis Trondheim]] besides being a huge [[Carl Barks]] fan.
Line 32:
** ...But rest assured, Tracy CAN [http://tracyjb.deviantart.com/art/Feathers-and-Tinctures-30039284 draw people.]
** [http://lackadaisy.foxprints.com/exhibit.php?exhibitid=184 Once in a] [http://www.lackadaisycats.com/exhibit.php?exhibitid=218 while she also] [http://lackadaisy.foxprints.com/exhibit.php?exhibitid=312 draws the cast] [http://lackadaisy.foxprints.com/exhibit.php?exhibitid=328 as humans].
* ''[[Coach Random]]'' had some characters drawn as dogs because the artist was under a deadline. [http://coachrandom.zzl.org/Chronological/comic-189.xml In one strip, he has humans and a dog side-by-side, showing the difference in how the artist drew them.]{{Dead link}} His humans are quite detailed. The dog, not so much.
* After seeing both humans and Furries as drawn by David Hopkins, the artist for the [[Furry Webcomic]] ''[[Jack (webcomic)|Jack]]'' ('''[[NSFW]]'''), it doesn't take much effort to figure out why he very rarely draws humans.
* ''[[VG Cats]]'' -- though—though the artist had no idea what Furries were when he started.
** Though the strip uses human characters at least as often as the cats, depending on what game is being mocked at the time.
* Doc Nickel (artist for ''[[The Whiteboard]]'') has explicitly stated that he used anthropomorphic animal characters because he couldn't draw humans for crap. According to several of his posts on the forums in August 2011, though, he's working on overcoming the problem with drawing humans, with more human characters being given actual details instead of undefined "floating bubbleheads".
Line 51:
 
== [[Western Animation]] ==
* Pretty much ''the'' reason why many, many cartoon characters were [[Funny Animal|Funny Animals]]s during [[The Golden Age of Animation]] when the medium was just getting started. Artists at that time knew how to draw people, sure, but ''animating'' them was a whole other story. Cartoons at the time all shared a very similar art style due to [[Follow the Leader]] and the fact that details were harder and more expensive to work in, so many characters tended to look exactly the same...what helped separate them from the masses were those one or two characteristics (ears, tails, etc.) indicating that X Character was supposed to be a Y Animal.
* As [[Walt Disney]] sought to drastically improve [[Art Evolution|animation quality and standards]] in his cartoons throughout the 1930's and early 40's, this trope became apparent in full force. Far and away the best and most revered Disney animation of the period tends to be either animal characters such as [[Mickey Mouse]], [[Donald Duck]], [[Goofy]], the [[Three Little Pigs]], [[Pinocchio (Disney film)|Jiminy Cricket]], [[Dumbo]] and [[Bambi]] or stylized caricatures of humans such as [[Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs (Disney film)|the Seven Dwarfs]].
* Because they found humans to be extremely hard to draw and animate with the technological limitations of the time, most of Pixar's earlier films primarily had either [[Toy Story (franchise)||toys]], [[A Bug's Life|insects]], [[Monsters, Inc.|monsters]], or [[Finding Nemo|fish]] as main characters. It wasn't until 2004's ''[[The Incredibles]]'' that humans became a large part of the characters in their movies ([[Cars|though not always]]).
 
== [[Real Life]] ==
Line 64:
[[Category:Photography and Illustration]]
[[Category:Animal Anthropomorphism Tropes]]
[[Category:Furries Are Easier to Draw{{PAGENAME}}]]