Furry Confusion/Analysis: Difference between revisions
→An Animal Character With a Pet is Not Always Furry Confusion: Curious George as the outer limit?
m (Mass update links) |
(→An Animal Character With a Pet is Not Always Furry Confusion: Curious George as the outer limit?) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{Analysis}}{{trope}}
=== A Quadrupedal Animal Character and a Bipedal Animal Character Together is Not Always Furry Confusion ===
Line 13:
== Literature ==
* The original ''[[
== Western Animation ==
* ''[[
* ''[[
* ''[[
* ''[[
* Spike and Tyke in ''[[
----
=== An Animal Character With a Pet is Not Always Furry Confusion ===
An animal character who owns a pet is usually viewed as being [[Furry Confusion]] more than a human with a pet is. But, depending on the situation, this is not always the case. For example, it's technically no more [[Furry Confusion]] for [[Mickey Mouse|a mouse]] or any animal beside a dog to have a pet dog than it is for a human to have a pet dog unless there are "anthro" dogs in the same universe. It's just [[Furry Confusion]] for any animal to have a ''member of its own species'' as a ''pet'' or be a species more closely related to their pet than, say, [[Curious George]] and Yellow Hat.
{{reflist}}
[[Category:Furry Confusion]]
[[Category:Analysis]]
| |||