Glass Cannon/Real Life: Difference between revisions

m
grouping
No edit summary
m (grouping)
Line 20:
* Light tanks by definition are supposed to be very mobile, protected from small arms and constitute a serious danger. E.g. Soviet BT Tanks: on most BT-5s, 45-mm longbarrel cannon, armour 10–13 mm—price of max speed 52 km/h on tracks and 72 on wheels.
** Some light tanks just go over the top, however. Look at [http://epizodsspace.airbase.ru/bibl/shirokorad/ot-min/244.jpg this] experimental [[Military Mashup Machine|monstrosity]] (1936-1936). It's a launcher for two fortification-busting 245-mm missiles slapped on BT-5. Max range is 1500 m. Failed [[Incredibly Lame Pun|to hit]] production run as unfit for real assault due to its crappy accuracy, slow reload and—surprise—fragility from top to bottom. Normally light tanks have nothing to do within visual range from enemy fortification even without extra explosives strapped on top.
** The US late World War 2 M24 Chaffee light tank is thinly armored even for a light tank, but carried the same gun as the Sherman medium tank. Cold War upgrades by Norway to create what was designated the NM-116 Panserjager took this even further, giving it ''even more'' gun (and new engine) but keeping the same armor.
* Nuclear missiles without silos are arguably the ultimate example of glass cannons in real life, especially in the context of a nuclear war. Ballistic missile submarines have torpedoes, but they would still be in deep trouble if found. Mobile ground based units are even worse, with [[wikipedia:File:SS-25 Sickle in Siberia.jpg|no defenses at all]] against the inevitable enemy counterattacks. Of course, you're supposed to just leave before the counterattack anyway.
* The torpedo boat was a small but maneuverable ship that had powerful armaments that could be used to sink the much bigger battleships of the era, and relied on its speed, agility, and ability to field a lot of them to avoid not getting destroyed.
Line 56 ⟶ 57:
* The Mitsubishi A6M Zero was extremely fragile, with no armor and fuel tanks that would leak continuously from even the smallest puncture instead of sealing like Allied tanks, so that even the most minor glancing hit could destroy it. It also had better armament than any of its rivals and could blast apart most Allied aircraft with a single burst, and a turn rate good enough to get into a firing position against even the most elusive enemy. It was the king of the Pacific skies until faster American fighters showed up that could simply barrel down on a Zero from above, destroy it, and run away before the Zero's wingmates could respond.
* The [[Dirty Commies|Soviet Union]] produced a literal example. The 2B1 Oka was the largest self-propelled artillery piece ever built, and could fire a 420mm ''nuclear projectile'' from it's 65-foot-long barrel up to 28 miles downrange. Unfortunately, the recoil of such a monster cannon was too powerful, damaging the gun mount, snapping the treads, and tearing up the transmission. Assuming it even could fire a second shot, it would be effectively a stationary artillery piece.
* The US late World War 2 M24 Chaffee light tank is thinly armored even for a light tank, but carried the same gun as the Sherman medium tank.
** Cold War upgrades by Norway to create what was designated the NM-116 Panserjager took this even further, giving it ''even more'' gun (and new engine) but keeping the same armor.
 
----