Harry Potter/Headscratchers/Other: Difference between revisions

m
Mass update links
(clean up)
m (Mass update links)
Line 9:
* [[Harry Potter and The Order of The Phoenix/Headscratchers|Harry Potter and The Order of The Phoenix]]
* [[Harry Potter and The Half Blood Prince/Headscratchers|Harry Potter and The Half Blood Prince]]
* [[Harry Potter (Franchise)/Harry Potter and Thethe Deathly Hallows/Headscratchers|Harry Potter]]
 
----
Line 164:
* Since wizards are practically powerless without their wand, why don't any of them use wrist straps?
** There probably are wrist straps or wand holders of some sort; it's just never touched on in the series. It's quite common in fanon that most adults have a wand holder that allows for easy access of their wand.
* This could probably fit with the Dursley entry above, but if they have been shown to not give a shit about Harry, why did they give him glasses? We've seen what the world looks like to him without his glasses (It's a slight blur), so it's not like Harry's [[Blind Without 'Em]]. And giving a kid glasses to correct his vision implies you care enough about that kid to help him see a bit better. If anything else, it'd probably amuse them to see Harry struggle to read small print (very small print, like on a ketchup label or something). Did the school force them to give Harry glasses or something?
** The school theory is entirely possible. At least here in Germany, you have several medical check-ups during primary school. Usually at least one Tetanus vaccination, one or the other dental check-up, and a general physical examination before you start swimming lessons in fourth grade. The latter one includes, among other things, an eyesight test.
*** (OP here) Interesting. But could a school really force the parents to give their kid glasses? What could the school board do if the Dursleys, say, refused and kept sending Harry to school w/o glasses? Sue them? Call Child Protection Service on them?