Mundane Dogmatic: Difference between revisions

m
clean up
m (Mass update links)
m (clean up)
Line 5:
 
* [[Faster-Than-Light Travel]]; space travel is limited to sub-light speeds and is difficult, time consuming, and expensive
* [[Alien Tropes|Space aliens]], unless the connection is distant, difficult, tenuous and expensive -- andexpensive—and they have no FTL travel either
* [[Alternate Universe|Alternative Universes]] interacting with the universe the characters are in.
* [[Functional Magic]]
Line 27:
== Comic Books ==
 
* The ''[[Tintin]]'' comic-books ''[[Tintin (Comic Book)/Recap/Destination Moon|Destination Moon]]'' and ''[[Tintin/Recap/Explorers on the Moon|Explorers on the Moon]]'' (Yes, really!).
 
== Film ==
 
* ''[[2001: A Space Odyssey]]'': The film follows the Manifesto while (ironically) the book by [[Arthur C. Clarke]] does not by (catch this) leaving the events ''more'' ambiguous. Because it's not clear that the events following David Bowman's encounter with the monolith are literally happening or are all just in his head, Kubrick's version slips by, while Clarke's (in which it's clear he's literally transported to other star systems) is more dubious (although the aliens who did it ''are'' [[Sufficiently Advanced Aliens|sufficiently advanced]]).
** In ''3001: The Final Odyssey'', Clarke [[Retcon|retconnedretcon]]ned the first novel's [[FTL]] travel as being all in Dave Bowman's head.
*** Clarke is ambiguous about whether 2010, 2061 or 3001 retcon anything. In the author's notes for 2061, Clarke indicates that the novels may involve the same characters and the same situations, but the novels do not *necessarily* happen in the same universe. So, either everything's retcons or it's parallel universes. Or we need to talk to Mr Schrodinger about his cat.
* ''[[Outland (film)|Outland]]''
Line 92:
* ''[[The Six Million Dollar Man]]''
* ''[[Firefly]]'' is probably the best known example on the list.
* ''[[Defying Gravity]]'', although there is some debate about whether or not the ''Antares''' communication system is FTL, even though it is never explicitly stated or even implied to be so. It ''appears'' to be FTL, because characters millions of kilometers away will be carrying on a casual conversation without any time lag, but this may just be for the audience's convenience. The characters could in fact have been waiting around for minutes at a time for their friends to respond to their messages ''offscreen''. On the other hand, it's unclear whether FTL communication is covered by the dogma in the first place (there are several well-known theoretical ways for FTL--evenFTL—even instantaneous--communicationinstantaneous—communication to occur without FTL travel, and they're generally considered to be more plausible than FTL travel).
 
 
10,856

edits