Neutron Bomb: Difference between revisions

m
Mass update links
m (remove unneccessary quote box template)
m (Mass update links)
Line 12:
The [[History of the Cold War|Cold War]] applications are obvious: nuking population centers is not such a great land-grab method, but deploying tanks is, and Russia had plenty of tanks.
 
Now, Cohen's original vision was for a similar device; presumably it would be somewhat larger and emit more neutron radiation. The burst parameters (yield, height of burst, etc.) would be carefully managed to minimize damage on the surface; however, the neutron bomb would emit enough of a pulse of radiation that it would kill everything on the ground in a substantial radius from the hypocenter. Cohen intended this to be a humanitarian weapon; civilians could retreat into underground shelters and be protected and when they emerged, although they'd find a lot of dead plants and animals, they wouldn't have to cope with as much in the way of devastation. The soldiers, though, wouldn't have that option, and would be killed; so, this was supposed to be a discriminate, humanitarian weapon. There are some doubts about its effectiveness, though; it would have to be detonated at high altitude to minimize explosive damage effects, but at such a high altitude the atmosphere might absorb most of the neutrons before they could reach the surface and do their work. Cohen made some claims to the contrary, but he's a little, well...credibility-wise, he could use some work in some respects. In addition, Soviet tanks were up-armoured to counter the potential threat of such a weapon before any neutron bomb was ever tested, let alone fielded. [[What an Idiot!|Then again, much of the armor for tanks is depleted uranium, which is worse than useless at stopping fusion neutrons. It'll absorb the neutrons, all right, but in doing so, the U-238 nuclei will fast fission, which will actually increase the dose received by the crew.]]
* Well, ''American'' armor. Soviet tank designers didn't use depleted uranium in their armor, instead going for tungsten, which is similarly hard and dense, but much less toxic and basically shrugs neutrons off. It doesn't offer much protection from them, true, but it doesn't get activated by them as well. Neutrons are effectively absorbed (without much activation) by hydrogen atoms, so plastics make a good neutron shields, so Soviet tanks had thick polythene covers under their armor, that also doubled as an anti-spalling layer. As their efficiency in that department left much to be desired, and neutron bombs fell out of favor, these were replaced by the more conventional kevlar ones.
** The reasoning behind putting fuel tanks in the sides and doors of certain Soviet APC and AFV designs was supposedly neutron protection. Armor is bad at stopping neutrons, but hydrogen-heavy diesel fuel excels at it.
Line 20:
The Soviet Union described the Neutron Bomb as "a capitalist weapon" because it was designed to destroy people while preserving their property. (And because they didn't have one of their own.)
 
{{examples|Examples:}}
 
== [[Anime]] and [[Manga]] ==