Perplexing Plurals: Difference between revisions

m
categories and general cleanup
m (categories and general cleanup)
Line 3:
<!-- %%Please see thread to suggest a new image. -->
 
Part of what you know when you know a language is how to make your words fit into a grammatical system. This can be fairly simple, as in English (the odd -s here, the odd -ed there) or fairly complex, as in the Russian case system. One thing all systems have in common though, is that they work all the time. For every singular, there is a plural.<ref> This is, of course, not true. Even in languages with a straightforward singular/plural distinction, there are always things like [http://en.[wikipedia.org/wiki/Plurale_tantum:Plurale tantum|"scissors" or "pants"]], or [http://en.[wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_noun:Mass noun|"stuff"]])</ref> It might be regular (trope, tropes) or irregular (goose, geese), but you know it's there and you know what it is.
 
...until you find yourself needing to talk about octopuses...octopus...octopi- no, [[Dog Latin|that's Latin]]...octopodes? Ugh, now this is going to bother me all day.
Line 14:
Note: This is crucially not a trope used by [[Funny Foreigner|Funny Foreigners]]. It is confusion about a speaker's '''own language''' (and the need to stop and work it out) and usually not caused by ignorance or [[Book Dumb]] (although expect a character beset by [[Sesquipedalian Loquaciousness]] to be immune).
 
{{examples|Examples}}
 
== Fan Works ==
Line 80:
[[Category:Dialogue]]
[[Category:Perplexing Plurals]]
[[Category:Pages with comment tags]]