Pushing Daisies/WMG: Difference between revisions

m
Mass update links
(clean up)
m (Mass update links)
Line 97:
** Dude, squirrels ''are'' evil.
*** Or at least have no souls.
* My theory? The equivalence of live. It only makes sense if the[[Buffy -Speak|all-mighty power thing]] only picks its victims at random, though, i.e., the squirrel in Digby's case. Maybe it ''was'' and evil squirrel? Maybe it stole some other squirrels nuts? Human life is worth Human life. Animal life is worth Animal life. Insect life is worth Insect life, though I might just be [[Fullmetal Alchemist|trying to tie together two fandoms]]...
** The "animal-for-an-animal" is canon. Dunno about evil, but that much is outright stated in "Pidge". Now, maybe if an evil squirrel dies to replace another evil squirrel, and a good squirrel for a good squirrel...
** This could still be true, It's not that the squirrel is completely 'evil', but something had to die , it was the most-'evil' equivalent life in the area.
Line 124:
The only person brought back after more than a couple of days was the dead prisoner in "Pigeon"; though he looked a bit shrivelled, the only thing that would have necessarily happened ''after'' his death was the rotting eyes, which were covered by Chuck's sunglasses. The fruit and leaves return to the state they were in when they were picked or the tree decided they had outlived their usefulness. The bearskin rug was never elaborated on.
== Ned will be the reason [[Death Is Cheap]] in [[DC Comics]] ==
DC has accepted Fullers' 12 book arc in DC. Provided [[Pushing Daisies]] is in the some Continuity as the rest of [[The Verse]], an [[Anti -Hero]] could theoreically be resurrected easily. Ned might have issue with this, but with an upcoming [[Zombie Apocalypse]], there could be plenty of victims that Ned doesn't feel bad about.
* Perhaps Ned will {{spoiler|become an unwilling tool of the Black Lanterns.}}
** Please, continue.