Rule 34/Headscratchers: Difference between revisions
Rescuing 1 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.8.6
m (→top: clean up, replaced: [[The Simpsons| → [[The Simpsons (animation)|) |
(Rescuing 1 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.8.6) |
||
| (8 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
Line 25:
* well, even that may not work, as, if we stretch the rule a bit, we can count mental images as porn, so you imagined you mystery thing, and now, thinking about a rule 34 version of it, you've [[Captain Obvious|though about a rule 34 version of it]]
* A lot of the confusion and knee-jerk reaction to disprove 34's absolute nature stems from the fact that they are thinking in specific details when Rule 34 doesn't require that. There is Star Trek/Star Wars crossover porn, but not being able to find a picture of Gul Madred and Lobot having sex doesn't mean you've disproven Rule 34. That's like saying there isn't porn of Ron Jeremy simply because he hasn't had sex with every woman on Earth. Likewise, abstract concepts don't apply since Existentialism doesn't "exist" in the same way Charlie Brown does. You cannot have the concepts of liberty and justice screwing, but you could have [
* I wonder, would it possible to overload rule 34 by challenging someone to make rule 34 of something that's already porn?
Line 56:
* Is there a gigantic master list of these "rules of the internet," from 1 to...some huge number anywhere out there? Was there ever a Rule 1, even? I mean, obviously this [[Rule 34]] had to come from ''somewhere.''
** Well, Rule 1 is you don't talk about--[[Curse Cut Short|oh shi--]]
** There is, but it was invented by /b/, and in general it isn't taken seriously. The first two rules are a parody of [[Fight Club (film)|Fight Club]].
*** And even then, rules one and two are generally used in a pathetic attempt at justifying 4chan as some "Secret hacker website".
**** No, it's actually just a precaution for raids, because people made trouble by publicly proclaiming to come from 4chan. At some point dogmatic /b/tards starting calling Rules 1&2 on any non-site mention of 4chan, until moot posted that "Rules 1&2 are for raids only".
Line 69:
** There's no [[Shout-Out|Rule Four]] either; or, more correctly, [[Monty Python's Flying Circus|"Rule Number Four; There is ''NO'' Rule Number Four]].
*** Actually, there is no Rule Six. Rule Four, I believe, is "I had better not catch anyone not drinking in bed after lights out".
* [
** Example. Rule 27: It needs [[Verbal Tic|moar]] [[Rozen Maiden|desu]]. No exceptions.
*** Unfair collorary: Rule 44: "Even one positive comment about Japanese things can make you a weeaboo." But what if you ''are'' Japanese?
Line 75:
** Rule Number 4: Anonymous does not forgive, Anonymous does not forget.
** Rule Number 6: Anonymous is still able to deliver.
** Rules 22 and 23: Copypasta is made to ruin every last bit of originality. Example: [http://encyclopediadramatica.
** Rule [[The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy|42]]: Nothing is sacred. Yes.
* What would happen if Muslims found a Rule Thirty Four version of ''Muhammad''?? We need to put some regulations on this stuff, people!
Line 111:
*** You are not accounting for duplicate pairings. There is no functional difference between Pokemon AB pairing veruse Pokemon BA pairing. It pretty much divide everything in half, which still gives us 274 million.
*** Nope, you forgot to account for [[Male X]] on [[Female Y]] versus [[Female X]] on [[Male Y]]. Pokémon have genders now.
*** Not all of them have genders though, and some are male (or female) only. Although that probably doesn't stop artists from making them have genders. In fact, Ash himself has dressed as a girl multiple times, so we should just double the amount of humans to include their [[Opposite
** If it counts [[Real Life]], almost certainly
* How the hell does the internet have porn of absolutely everything? I can think of Adolf Hitler having sex with [[The Big O|Roger Smith]] in the middle of the [[Eurovision Song Contest]]. I can think of Eve in a BDSM relationship with Baby Jesus. I can think of the CEO of Colombia Pictures and the President of Colombia having sex with Colombia from [[The Rocky Horror Picture Show]]. However, [[This Troper]] doubts there's porn of any of that. What happened to "No Exceptions"?
Line 118:
*** Rule 34 paper towels. Rule 34 ashtrays. Rule 34 oceans,<ref>You've never seen a fic with two people having sex in the ocean? -Eds.</ref> those two islands in the Bering Strait, keyboards, mice, watering cans, tomatoes, churches...
**** Mountain Dew and bologna sandwiches, ''continents''.
***** [https://web.archive.org/web/20210325072115/http://img.chan4chan.com/img/2009-03-25/1238015722398.jpg Mountain Dew and a sandwich you say?]
**** I'm pretty sure I've seen porn involving mice and tomatoes. Not at the same time. Though that would be hot.
***** Gadget Hackwrench wearing nothing but a hula-skirt made from a tomato. To her left, Tara the tomato girl from [[Attack of the Killer Tomatoes]] the cartoon, with a hula-skirt made from all the other cartoon mice conntected together by their tails. You can thank me later for that image!
Line 178:
**** Hm, no, sorry, can't find it. Yep, I'm curious, WHAT?!
*** See? I ''told'' you you should have gone with my super-badass mascot idea!
** Trope-tan Rule 34: [https://web.archive.org/web/20160302082459/http://rule34.paheal.net/post/view/737042
* [[Tempting Fate|I bet everything I own]] that there's no ''[[Mischief Makers]]'' Rule 34.
** [http://rule34.paheal.net/post/list/Mischief_Makers/1 Yeah, about that...]
Line 190:
*** Think about the shape of ''the number 3'' for a minute.
*** That explains the [[Bathroom Stall Graffiti]] at this Troper's college's bathrooms.
** It existed so long that [https://web.archive.org/web/20131208070407/http://rule34.it/ Rule34 and Ponychan had a baby!] ...And it likes pasta and [[Kick the Dog|kicking around]] helpless dragonturtles.
* The extent that some Rule 34 can go bugs me. For instance, as I mentioned on the [[Power Rangers]] IJBM board, there's a disturbing trend in both the [[Furry Fandom]] and [[Super Sentai]] communities where virtually ''every'' bit of porn based around Doggie Kruger simply ''has'' to depict him as being the bottom slut of a heavy BDSM fantasy...''including any straight porn of him''. Why is that? Is it the standard "bring the big badass guy down a few pegs by making him a submissive" fantasy? If so, why is the ''straight porn'' of him depicting that, not just the gay stuff? Is it because he's treated like that by his associates on the show itself, and this is simply a fanboy (or fangirl) exaggeration of that? What?
** Hey, straight girls can top too, you know.
Line 222:
*** [[Fetish Fuel|Hawt.]]
* What are the other rules, other then 34 and 36?
** Here: [http://encyclopediadramatica.
* It just bugs [[Ethereal Frog|This Troper]] how ''damn'' popular Lucario is in the [[Furry Fandom|furrier parts]] of the [[Pokémon]] 34-dom. I have only seen a Lucario outside of a [[Lemon|lemon-fic]] one time. But of the 20 or so lemons I've read that could be considered "good", only 5 of them didn't have a Lucario. What I consider the best one I've read had 3!
** That's due to several factors really. Lucario had lines and characterization in a widely released movie, appeared in the extremely popular [[Super Smash Brothers Brawl]] (a game which took Fur Affinity by storm when it came out), and is already vaguely anthropomorphic and appears vaguely Anubian besides (still a popular quality in the fandom no matter what denials you might hear).
Line 229:
* Where's the loli [[Trauma Center|Amy/Tyler/Derek/Angie]] bi 34?
** [http://www.google.com/ Here.]
** Where's the [[Lolicon|loli]] [[Sonic the Hedgehog|Amy/]][[Fight Club (film)|Tyler/]][[The Swan Princess|Derek/]][[Concession|Angie]] bi [[Squick|34]]?{{supersecretspoiler| It could have been [[Life with Derek|worse]], I'm not ''that'' awful.}}
* On this page, whenever someone asks if porn of X exists, are they just trying to sake their own weird fetish without having to look it up themselves? On an unrelated note, does anyone know if porn involving people having swarms of rats crawl all over their naked bodies? [[Hypocritical Humor|just curious.]]
** This troper has ''looked and looked'' for [[Starlight Express]] porn for YEARS with no luck, so I could be they just haven't found it.
*** Is [https://web.archive.org/web/20081202125837/http://www.bellesdomain.co.uk/compjuly07.html this] arousing enough for you?
** ...Have you actually just answered your own question? Because, you know, it ''could'' be someone's fetish...
* If it exists there's porn of it? What about most people, animals and plants?
Line 349:
* Alright, this one has been challenging my friends and I for some time. "Calculus Porn." Not porn of ''calculus teachers'' but porn of that branch of mathematics. We then attempted Rule 35, only to fail, as we couldn't figure out what calculus porn would ''look like.''
** My guess would be the formulas and symbols in flagrante delicto.
** Per Rule 34, yes, it exists... although it's pretty lame. There's at least one mathematical function where the result is plotted as a three-dimensional curve, shaped like a pair of human breasts. And then there's [https://graphics.stanford.edu/courses/cs348c-95-fall/software/polly/joke.html that explicit story] about someone-or-other named [[Punny Name|Polly Nomial]] who keeps insisting she's "absolutely convergent".
* Two words: [https://www.vice.com/en_ca/article/xgq5ew/coronavirus-porn-going-viral-pornhub-xhamster coronavirus porn]. It exists. Psychologists are [https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-myths-sex/202003/how-the-pandemic-is-changing-pornography asking why].
** According to Psychology Today: "What does coronavirus porn look like? It involves a lot of people having sex while wearing masks, surgical gloves, and hazmat suits."
{{reflist}}
Line 354 ⟶ 358:
[[Category:Headscratchers]]
__NOTOC__
[[Category:
| |||