Rule 34/Headscratchers: Difference between revisions
Rescuing 2 sources and tagging 0 as dead. #IABot (v2.0beta9)
(update links) |
(Rescuing 2 sources and tagging 0 as dead. #IABot (v2.0beta9)) |
||
Line 25:
* well, even that may not work, as, if we stretch the rule a bit, we can count mental images as porn, so you imagined you mystery thing, and now, thinking about a rule 34 version of it, you've [[Captain Obvious|though about a rule 34 version of it]]
* A lot of the confusion and knee-jerk reaction to disprove 34's absolute nature stems from the fact that they are thinking in specific details when Rule 34 doesn't require that. There is Star Trek/Star Wars crossover porn, but not being able to find a picture of Gul Madred and Lobot having sex doesn't mean you've disproven Rule 34. That's like saying there isn't porn of Ron Jeremy simply because he hasn't had sex with every woman on Earth. Likewise, abstract concepts don't apply since Existentialism doesn't "exist" in the same way Charlie Brown does. You cannot have the concepts of liberty and justice screwing, but you could have [
* I wonder, would it possible to overload rule 34 by challenging someone to make rule 34 of something that's already porn?
Line 190:
*** Think about the shape of ''the number 3'' for a minute.
*** That explains the [[Bathroom Stall Graffiti]] at this Troper's college's bathrooms.
** It existed so long that [https://web.archive.org/web/20131208070407/http://rule34.it/ Rule34 and Ponychan had a baby!] ...And it likes pasta and [[Kick the Dog|kicking around]] helpless dragonturtles.
* The extent that some Rule 34 can go bugs me. For instance, as I mentioned on the [[Power Rangers]] IJBM board, there's a disturbing trend in both the [[Furry Fandom]] and [[Super Sentai]] communities where virtually ''every'' bit of porn based around Doggie Kruger simply ''has'' to depict him as being the bottom slut of a heavy BDSM fantasy...''including any straight porn of him''. Why is that? Is it the standard "bring the big badass guy down a few pegs by making him a submissive" fantasy? If so, why is the ''straight porn'' of him depicting that, not just the gay stuff? Is it because he's treated like that by his associates on the show itself, and this is simply a fanboy (or fangirl) exaggeration of that? What?
** Hey, straight girls can top too, you know.
| |||