Screwed by the Lawyers: Difference between revisions

Line 70:
 
== New Media ==
* The phrase "this video has been removed due to a copyright claim from *insert name of company here*" has become a well known sight on Youtube[[YouTube]], even with [[Team Four Star]], who put a disclaimer at the beginning of every episode they post. The Warner Music Group has also been responsible for taking away music from videos, saying that it's violating copyright. When the user gets hit with a Copyrightcopyright strike, Theythey would beare sent to ''[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=InzDjH1-9Ns YouTube Copyright School]'', an official lecture video animated by the makers of ''[[Happy Tree Friends|Youtube Copyright School]]'', and wouldare forced to watch the lecture video about thecopyright law of copyright and take related trivia questions.
** Certain videos have managed to avoid this fate by claiming Fair Use.
** [[YouTube]] has come under fire for the fact that they remove videos just because of an infringement claim without investigating whether the video is Fair Use or not. [[YouTube]], and "Content Service Providers" in general, are required by law to pull without investigation as soon as they receive proper notice, or else they themselves can be [[Incredibly Lame Pun|Sued By The Lawyers]]. Uploaders can object to cases of "mistake or misidentification", in other words claiming that the copyright owner made a mistake when it failed to see that "it's legal Fair Use, damn it!"
** One machinima short was completely muted by WMG specifically because of ''one short song clip'' used in the beginning of the video.
** Curiously, there is a pattern that tends to emerge with what gets pulled and what doesn't, even aside from some content owners being more stringent about it that others: TV shows and movies (''especially'' current ones) are the strictest, along with popular music (unless the artists ''deliberately'' use online distribution [[No Such Thing as Bad Publicity|as free advertising]]). Music from other sources, though, tends to be less strictly enforced. Rarest of all to be cut are video game clips; since [[Captain Obvious|you can't actually play the game on YouTube]], each video game clip is basically a trailer the producers didn't have to pay for. Also, [[Fan Vid|AMVs]] are, for whatever reason, often kept in the same way [[Fanfic]] in general is rarely targeted, despite theoretically having two possible angry claimants.
** But since anyone can make a copyright claim, they don't need any proof that you are the copyright holder, and since they don't investigate any claims, anyone who just doesn't like someone's video or even a bot can file a false claim. To dispute the claim, you must provide unnecessary personal information (your full name, phone number, physical address, email address) meaning most people who are the victim of a false copyright claim would just not bother disputing. Even though [[YouTube]] tells people not to file false claims and that repeated false claims could get the person is legal trouble, that doesn't stop people from filing false claims.
* The above was what caused [[That Guy With The Glasses]] to start its own site...and now many years later, when [[Obscurus Lupa]] and [[The Nostalgia Critic]]'s reviews of ''[[The Room]]'' got pulled for this very reason, fans got ''pissed''.
** The Critic responded to the legal threats by posting a video that was basically an entire episode's worth of [[Take That]]s against the individuals responsible.