Shrek/Headscratchers: Difference between revisions
Rescuing 1 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.8.9
(Rescuing 1 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.8) |
(Rescuing 1 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.8.9) |
||
Line 59:
** Ugh, seconded. The first movie was made of awesome. It was such a great subversion of fairy tales and it stood so well alone...
*** The director of the first film said that ''Shrek'' was going to be stand alone, until the money started rolling in. So now it's a [[Cash Cow Franchise]].
*** For public consideration, Shrek's franchise status was predicted back in 2001 by, of all people, [https://
** In regards to the second film, This Troper disagress, as he thought ''Shrek 2'' was a huge improvement over the first film.
*** [[Your Mileage May Vary]]. I thought the second film wasn't bad, either, but I definitely felt it wasn't better than the first one; at best, I think they are equals. Now, about the third film, on the other hand...
| |||