Speculative Fiction/Headscratchers: Difference between revisions

m
update links
m (Mass update links)
m (update links)
Line 51:
**** Never said it was invented in ''[[Harry Potter]]''. Just said it was used there. Same goes for the ''Split Infinity'' borders.
*** It kinda makes sense. If you could generate energy that allows you break the laws of physics, then theoretically some of that ambient energy might affect nearby electronics. Sometimes other electronics mess up different electronics.
** Probably because there is a very thin line between science and explained magic. Basically, once you start [[Magic aA Is Magic A|explaining how stuff works]], you [[Jumping Off the Slippery Slope|jump off the slippery slope towards science]]. Because after all, science is basically just process of finding out what makes the world around us works. For example, [[The Dresden Files]] could easily redefine magic as the process of creating (through emotions) and manipulating energy. Its basically the lack of [[Expospeak]] and lack of explanation on why magical creatures work the way that keeps it rooted firmly in the "magic" area. A better rule of thumb would be if "[[A Wizard Did It|its magic]]" is the standard explanation for why crap happens in the story, its pure fantasy (in the sense of fantasy being magic and such). If it starts asking/explaining why, its moving closer and closer to science, [[Magic aA Is Magic A|even if the rules of said universe may be different from our own]].
** Warcraft actually does this pretty well, in my opinion. Yes, it's still basically steampunk tech, but they do have sentient robots and technomages, and a lot of the Titan constructs seem to have an interesting blend of technology and magic.
** Because would ''you'' let a bunch of [[The Fair Folk|fairies]] get the opportunity to program robots? I'd run for the goddamn hills.