The Order of the Stick/Headscratchers: Difference between revisions

Rescuing 1 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.8.6
m (revise quote template spacing)
(Rescuing 1 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.8.6)
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 25:
*** It is likely that Tiamat would specifically instruct the Oracle not to provide any assistence to Xykon or Redcloak, considering the danger that they pose to reality. As Start of Darkness showed, Tiamat was the Evil deity who was initially against informing the Dark One about the Snarl.
**** Two things. One, that is very likely. Two, GO TIAMAT! In your platinum-plated [[Holier Than Thou]] face, Bahamut!
* Okay, well one of when the things that [[Just Bugs Me]] is about Fyron's "son". In comic [http://www.giantitp.com/comics/oots0110.html #110], Roy says "You needed some sort of magical doodad that he owned, so you killed him and his son in cold blood." Yet, in Start of Darkness where we see Fyron and Xykon's fight and no son was there. No son was ever mentioned. So... what's with that?
** In the first volume, Rich didn't have the backstory entirely straightened out. Eugene's first appearance, wherein he apparently has contact with Roy's mother and expresses a desire to communicate with his son, would be a prime illustration. Still, Fyron's son could be retconned in somewhere.
** I'm not so sure about that... I mean, I can understand it if the son had only been mentioned once in the early strips, but Roy mentions it again in [http://www.giantitp.com/comics/oots0434.html 434].
Line 60:
****** [[wikipedia:Girdle of Femininity/Masculinity|Yes]].
****** Oooookay. THAT Just Bugs Me.
******* Only because you've never read [https://web.archive.org/web/20080208091645/http://atrocities.primaryerror.net/fatal.html the review of the infamous F.A.T.A.L]. After THAT (warning: not ANYTHING safe), you'll think it's a positively charming item.
****** It's a good way to slow down your mega loot-spree party. And as it doesn't technicaly exist in 3rd edition, it could be multi-use just fine. The Remove Curse is for the person, not the item.
***** Or... they could just find another belt...
Line 82:
** epic level hippies are still hippies. Rich was making fun of [[Strawman Political|touchy-feely enviromentalism]], and Redcloak was showing off how much of a nerd he is.
** Further noted, this is [[Truth in Television]]. Those massive fires out in California? ''this is precisely what happened.''
** Another possibility might be that the druids assumed they would always be around to stop any fires that got started(provided they didnt have to repel an invading goblin army at the same time). Magic would be much more effective at firefighting than the means we use in RL. Control Weather, anyone? That way, they could keep their forest without having to periodically loose some of their precious fluffy animals.
*** I know it was meant for humour, it still bugs me...
** Note that Redcloak is apparently intelligent enough to have anachronistic knowledge far beyond that of his contemporaries (titantium elementals, anyone?), so this is likely just another example of that.
Line 98:
** While we're at it, why is Durkon drawn small? Dwarves are medium.
*** Dwarves are medium due to their stocky, wide builds. They are, indeed, short.
** [[Word of God]]- Burlew said he designed them that way intentionally to make them more fearsome an enemy.
* Given that everyone forgets what happens in Sunken Valley (except for the questions they asked), how did Goblin Dan remember how to properly exploit the unconscious hydra? Did he ask the Oracle "What possible use is an unconscious hydra?"... might explain why kobolds eat free on certain days at certain times.
** He saw a dead hydra, realized he could sell the heads, and dragged it out of Sunken Valley. He then saw a dead hydra, realized he could sell the heads, and dragged it to wherever he lives. What's the problem?
Line 106:
** As Burlew has said repeatedly, the comic isn't ''in'' an actual D&D setting.
*** That is true, but I get the impression that people think the deconstruction applies to regular D&D too.
**** Well...the deconstruction still applies to regular D&D in a slightly different, more "meta" way, in that it rejects the automatic assumption, found in D&D and most other Tolkienesque fantasy settings that "inhuman" races (goblins, orcs, lizardmen, etc.) are automatically evil and unfamilial due to their inhumanity.
***** Note that Tolkien rejected the concept of an always evil race and for years wrestled with the implications that the orcs brought to the table. Later fantasy authors just ignored this. Also, D&D works however the players and DM wants it to work. I don't recall any Monster Manuals going into detail about Goblin family life, but even if they did it would just be guidelines. The fact is that sentience and free will is incompatible with [[Always ChaoticExclusively Evil]].
*** Even [[Always ChaoticExclusively Evil]] isn't ''Always'' [[Chaotic Evil]]. The books explicitly say that there ''are'' exceptions, just that they are so rare as to make little statistical difference. Sort of like how the PHB lists the range for human heights, but doesn't take into account that there have been humans who are as small as halflings or as tall as ogres. It's just not common enough to really have any impact. Maybe one in every 10,000 demons isn't CE, but even those are generally only one step away, which could just as easily mean [[Neutral Evil]].
* Why has updates been so sparse lately? I mean that as an actual question, not a gripe. I don't expect him to devote himself full time to the comic, but if I remember right he's successful enough that he doesn't have a job, and if so it seems odd to only have one update per week, or two updates at the start and end of the week.
** Health concerns for the author. He's planning to take a break from the comic after this current arc ends as well.
Line 142:
* This dragon is going through WAY too much considering the afterlife is literally a revolving door...
** Maybe only humanoids can be resurrected from the dead?
** He was killed by a disintegrate spell, and her mother said that his ashes had dissolved into the swamp. Raising a creature without any trace of a corpse requires True Resurrection, and it seems that [http://www.giantitp.com/comics/oots0579.html clerics that can cast 9th level spells are rare] in the [[The Order of the Stick|Order of the Stick]] world.
*** "Where can I find someone able and willing to cast true resurrection to revive my son" isn't that hard to ask the Oracle... Can't you also use wish and a lesser spell anyway?
**** She is a Chaotic Evil creature... who would be willing to have a deal with her?
***** Someone who doesn't want to be eaten for saying, "No, I won't resurrect your son"?
Line 159:
*** Elves don't need to trance as much as humans need to sleep. Are there even any penalties to not trancing?
*** That guy who stayed up for 11 or something days had no serious problem with basic math until, IIRC, day 9 or so. Then things got BAD.
*** From personal experience, round about day 4 you start having minor perception problems. Colors don't look right, your eyes focus wrong, stuff looks like it vibrates. It becomes difficult to form complex sentences on day five. Day six, doing more than one thing at a time becomes almost prohibitively difficult. Basic math never went for me, but I doubt I could have done calculus.
** It's been bugging me for weeks that Vaarsuvius is still able to cast spells, if he hasn't tranced (or at least hasn't tranced more than a couple of minutes every so often, considering the strip with his nightmare). I thought elves had to trance for a full four hours before they regained their used spell slots.
*** That's the joke. By the Rules As Written, an elf technically just needs "restful calm" in order to replenish his/her spells. Trancing has nothing to do with it:
Line 210:
*** You're not getting it. V left the fleet ''specifically'' to get away from Durkon and Elan because he thought they were distractions. He didn't want their help, and didn't think they ''could'' help. If you mean between the Dragon leaving and the fiends showing up, that was all of about a minute or so, during which he had something he thought could grant him the power instantly. Do you have any idea how long it would take a bird to fly out to a fleet of ships in the middle of nowhere when it has no idea where said fleet is? ''Far'' longer than it would've taken for the Dragon to do her thing and leave.
** There he is in 658. Looks like he's about to do something important too.
** V's raven runs purely off of [[Rule of Funny]] it seems. Having actually played a ''D&D'' campaign with a character using a familiar, it's really like they don't exist ''until'' the player encounters a situation where the familiar would be useful and the player suddenly remembers that he or she has an animal that's supposed to be following them around. The strip uses that as a gag, making the raven next to Vaarsuvius when it can come in handy (such as serving as a recurring gag in previous appearances), as the characters only now remember that V actually ''has'' a familiar in the first place.
* Vaarsuvius could have easily won the battle against Xykon in a matter of rounds, tops, had he did a few simple things like buffing against Necromancy and Death magic before hand, and not wasted rounds on ranged touch attacks, avoided using his own spells and rely on the splice spells instead. And did not forget to use quickened spells in conjunction with normal spells. The [[Idiot Ball]] award goes to V. More info on the forums.
** Well, the best buffs against Necromacy and Death Magic are Cleric spells, spells V can't replicate, and ze would refuse to get from Durkon, since ze wants to prove Arcane Power trumps all. As well, from what I saw, all this theoretical power V should have is based on unknowns, namely the actual power and abilities of the spliced souls. "If they didn't pick that, they're too stupid to be mages." Yes, because every character in [[The Order of the Stick|Order of the Stick]] has been perfectly optimized for maximum effectiveness.
** Because [https://web.archive.org/web/20110902100105/http://www.giantitp.com/FAQ.html#faq7 point #7 on the FAQ.] The relevant part:
{{quote|''The strip is ABOUT the trouble these characters get in; if a tactic would result in an effortless solution to their latest problem, there would be little point in showing it, see? The characters are woefully inefficient as a result, and often take actions that are rarely seen in a real D&D game, like running away from moderate danger or .forgetting. major abilities for the sake of a joke. But their foibles are what fuel the humor.''}}
** "The Idiot Ball award goes to V." Well yeah, that was kinda the point. V was drunk on power and trying to batter Xykon to death (well, redeath) with the most powerful spells he/she had on hand. Xykon himself says so in his [[Hannibal Lecture]] immediately after crushing V.
** Remember, V's first attempted spell after teleporting in was "Time Stop," which he'd used in the battle with the dragon to give himself time for spell buffs and a little trap work. He was probably planning to do the same here, before he got zapped by the magic traps. So he certainly should have done it BEFORE teleporting in, but that's not the same thing as not planning for it. It's still a screwup, but a smaller one.
* How did Xykon managed to [[Ass Pull]] the strength to crush V with a giant rock DURING the middle of V's turn?
** Liches gain a Strength boost when they transform. Also, magic items. According to D&D strength rules and carrying capacity, a character with a solid strength score (14 or so) can lift several hundred pounds directly over their head. With a decent strength-boosting magic item, it's not going to be hard for Xykon to lift a large chunk of stone over his head, hold it (he's not going to suffer muscle fatigue, after all) and then use it as an improvised weapon to drop it on V.
Line 246:
** I'd like to point out that had a certain Treasure Type O-deprived ex-paladin not stuck her irritating nose into things, this plan would have worked perfectly.
** What bugs me about that whole episode is this: why did no one think to tell the Sapphire Guard that the reason they and no one else were stationed in the throne room during the Siege of Azure City was to act as soon-to-be ghostly reinforcements for Soon Kim? It's not as if the paladins spoiler: are afraid of death, after all; their code of honour demands they be ready for it at any time. So surely it would've been a good idea to inform them of the plan just in case, when it became clear that they were not going to survive, one of them decided to try and destroy the Gate, thus rendering them unable to come back from the grave and face Xykon, not to mention blowing up a good portion of the caste. As did indeed happen, after all, albeit in a slightly roundabout manner...
*** Whose to say they didn't? Hinjo was explaining to Durkon, who wouldn't have known the Paladin's-Ultimate-Secret Defense-of-Honor-and-Awesomeness anyway.
*** Hinjo said it. He specifies that it's a secret known only to the ruling family.
*** Hinjo also states that all the paladins knew they would probably die defending the throne room.
Line 289:
** Purgatory? Does that even exist? Soon's dialogue to her as she dies seems to suggest she'll be reincarnated, in my opinion.
*** I like the notion of "wandering ghost" myself.
** Since we know that Mount Celestia, Pandemonium & Mechanus (outsourcing), and Limbo (slaad) exist, it seems likely that he's using the "[[Planescape|Great Ring]]" default cosmology. Therefore, Miko is almost certainly in Arcadia, the Plane of Lots of Law, Some Good, where the trees and grass grow in nice geometric patterns and night and day progress evenly without anything so untidy as twilight.
** Like the above troper said, Rich seems to be using the normal game cosmology. Check [[wikipedia:Outer Plane|the other wiki]] for details on the planes, or read the "outer planes" section of the Planewalker Guidebook on [httphttps://wwwweb.archive.org/web/20090723144524/http://geocities.com/gradasso/ this site].
** The fact that Miko lost her paladin powers does not mean that her actual alignment shifted. She could still have been lawful good upon her death, even though she fell as a paladin. Paladins have a very strict "never commit an evil act or violate the paladin code" rule, but just being lawful good is a looser requirement. As such, she could be eligible for the standard LG afterlife, like Roy. (This seems to be what Soon suggests when he says that Miko will see Windstriker again in #464.)
* Why are the Order of the Stick apparently the only band of adventurers trying to stop Xykon? You'd think with the sheer number of people he killed there'd be more than one lousy blood oath against him. They should be a major industry of the campaign setting by now.
Line 302:
** On another point, Xykon's the only Lich we've seen in the world, and near as I can tell, nobody's mentioned any others, so while it's unlikely that Xykon's the only Lich in the setting, it's possible that they're pretty darn rare, enough so that the whole phylactery thing isn't widely known unless you're the sort of person who's looking to become or create a Lich, like, say, an Evil aligned Cleric.
*** No. Redcloak knew about liches on a purely academic level in ''Start of Darkness''. There have been enough liches in this world. (Consider also, that [http://www.giantitp.com/comics/oots0013.html Elan knew enough at least to call Xykon a lich]. How would he know this if Xykon is unique?)
**** Perhaps because "lich" is an existing, although archaic, word for corpse (Hence the lich-gate in a church).
*** I acknowledged that it was very likely there were other Liches in the setting. Also, I ''did'' mention that Evil aligned Clerics would probably know about it, and hey, that's what Redcloak is. As for Elan, knowing enough to call a skeletal sorceror a Lich doesn't mean he knows everything ''about'' them.
** That's mostly what I was thinking; I guess specifically what I meant when I said it Just Bugs Me is that I wish they had at least said "What about the phylactery?" "I'm sure it was destroyed in the explosion," followed by some of the inevitable lampshading about [[Never Found the Body]].
Line 328:
* Know what bugs me? The "paladin didn't fall, therefore these people are guilty" defence. (I'll acknowledge that the individuals using it were basically a team of an [[Amoral Attorney]] and [[The Ditz]], and I know it isn't meant seriously). There is, to the best of my knowledge, nothing in the paladin's code that states that arresting a person who all the evidence fits but who just happens to be innocent, and bringing them to a trial you believe to be fair, leads to be falling. Indeed, it could be argued that letting the courts handle it is ''more'' [[Lawful Good]] than the traditional "kill them and take their stuff" of RPG campaigns. So...why was the prosecution using it on a room filled with people who should know this, being paladins themselves?
** 1) Lawyers everywhere use arguments that are obviously spurious if you know what you're talking about but still sound good, all the time. <br />2) Those particular lawyers aren't very bright.
** I always thought of it as poking fun of "Paladin-based Morality" that gets around some D&D groups, where a Paladin (usually an NPC, or worse, a [[Mary Sue|DMPC]]) functions as the moral barometer for everyone else just by virtue of his class-- the idea that the Paladin wouldn't do it if it ''wasn't'' Lawful Good. That said, in a jury full of Paladins, it was probably the best (if still lame) argument they could have made-- after all, what better way to get a bunch of [[Knight Templars]] on your side than to convince them that their gods are already there? At least if they disagree it would look like they thought their judgment was superior to that of the Twelve Gods, since the jury wouldn't be allowed to argue the point.
* Okay, how did Xykon get so powerful since Roy last fought him? He really hasn't been doing all that much except maybe killing a handful of good-aligned monsters in his old tower. If anything, one would think that a lich dying and regenerating would leave him slightly weakened (though I don't know the rules on that). Was it because when the Order first fought him he underestimated them and didn't bust out his major spells, or what?
** Xykon in the first battle wasn't trying to outright destroy the Order. He wanted them to activate the gate, and was playing around with them to that end. Roy's "killing" blow caught him completely by surprise. Xykon was as powerful then as he is now.
Line 344:
*** ''"considering the paladins' actions in Start of Darkness"'' God, how often does this have to be pointed out? The events in Start Of Darkness are ''deliberately'' skewed into the villains' POV. Rich Burlew said that explicitly.
**** No, he stated that the fall of Azure City was Karma biting them in the ass for their rampant slaughter of monstrous humanoid villages in ''War and XPs''.
**** [[Death of the Author|Then he was wrong]]. To elaborate, [[Good Is Not Nice]] is a major theme of OotS (and especially of Start of Darkness). The events of Start Of Darkness still happened, but in SOD they're shown from the perspective of the the goblins. Take a look at any strip (especially the earlier ones) where the Order is killing NPC enemies. Is that evil? Is karma going to "bite them in the ass" for it? The paladins attacked the goblins to kill the bearer of the Crimson Mantle, and they killed the others to prevent one of them from taking up the Mantle again. Lo and behold, that's what ended up happening anyway. The elephant in the living room in Start Of Darkness (whether Rich intended it or not) is that while the humanoids make big noises about speciesism, what they really seem to be after is a license to be [[Always ChaoticExclusively Evil]]. If they'd just become Good then paladins who attacked them ''would'' fall.
***** Death of the Author my ass. What those Paladins did was wrong, they killed freaking children, how did you miss that? The majority of the Goblins don't seem to have actually done anything wrong, and Right Eye and his village actually lived in peace for years before Xykon fucked that up. I mean, where are you even getting that [[Good Is Not Nice]] is a theme of OotS? And it most certainly is not shown from the perspective of the Goblins, I have no idea where you got that, just as it always has been in [[The Order of the Stick|Order of the Stick]] we see it from an omniscient third person view.
*** First and foremost, [[Death of the Author]] does ''not'' mean that the opinion of the author is wrong. It means that his viewpoint is no more or less valid than that of any particular reader. It puts all interpretations on the same level; it doesn't make yours right. Secondly, what happened to Redcloak's village was wrong. It doesn't mean that his subsequent actions were right, it means that wiping out a small village of unarmed non-combatants while they begged for mercy is not a good thing to do, even if it is a Good thing to do. And finally, the paladins' attack on the entire goblin village, where the goal is ostensibly to kill the bearer of the Crimson Mantle and prevent anyone else from taking it over, could have been accomplished by focusing their attacks on the Mantle and only killing anyone stupid enough to come near. Instead, they opted for genocide.
*** First and foremost, I never said that [[Death of the Author]] meant he was wrong, I said that he was wrong, and potholed it to a trope that covers disagreement with [[Word of God]]. If I had thought that was proof enough I wouldn't have then said "To elaborate...". Apart from that, you apparently basically agree with me that Redcloak's subsequent actions were not justified and most importantly that the fall of Azure city is not karmic justice by any measure. To the previous troper, where are ''you'' even getting that Good ''Is'' Nice in Order of the Stick? You just spent the first half of your post detailing exactly how not-nice the forces of Good have been. Sounds like a pretty strong theme to me. And yeah, it is from the goblins' perspective, the fact that we aren't literally looking through the eyes of a goblin doesn't change that. You say that "The majority of the Goblins don't seem to have actually done anything wrong" but you don't realise that this is a function of seeing it through the goblins' eyes (again, not literally). How do you know they haven't done anything wrong? Compare how casually the citizens of Gobbotopia approach the subject of slavery later on in the strip proper. The paladins may not have been justified, but they weren't Evil.
** [[Word of God]] on this issue: [http://www.giantitp.com/forums/showthread.php?p=8081896#post8081896 Many of the paladins DID fall], but because of the [[Law of Conservation of Detail]], it wasn't shown.
Line 352:
* It's clear that the two main villains are Redcloak and Xykon, but which one is the [[Big Bad]] and which is [[The Dragon]]? It's kinda hard to tell sometimes.
** Xykon is the [[Big Bad]], Redcloak is the villainous [[Hypercompetent Sidekick]].
*** Seems more like a [[Big Bad Duumvirate]], at least from Redcloak's POV. Redcloak only allies with Xykon out of necessity, and while he does generally follow his orders, pretty much only does so because he needs his metaphysical muscle to complete his own plan. While Xykon pretty much does think of himself as the bigBad and Redcloak as [[The Dragon]] and keeps Redcloak around due to the above mention hyper competence.
** That's more or less the point. It's near impossible to tell whether Redcloak or Xykon is really [[The Man Behind the Man]], to the extent that seeing Xykon as the [[Big Bad]] with Redcloak as his [[The Starscream|bitch]] is no more or less accurate as seeing Redcloak as the [[Big Bad]] with Xykon as his [[The Dragon|subtlye manipulated tool]]. Xykon sees it as the former, Redcloak sees it as the latter, and only time will really tell.
* Minor complaint: Belkar acts more like a Rogue than a Ranger and Hayley acts more like a Ranger than a Rogue. It's always annoyed me in the back of my mind.
Line 390:
* So, Girard lied to Soon about the location of his gate...how did that work? The gates weren't mobile. They were anchored in space, and the whole Order of the Scribble visited each one. Soon, you'd think, would have known where each gate was without having to hear it secondhand; if not the exact location, then the general area at least, and therefore the other Paladins ought to have known.
** Soon knows the general area is somewhere in the desert, which Girard describes as "the world's largest desert." That's not nearly enough to narrow down the gate location, specially when it is hidden by an epic illusionist. I mean, what is Soon going to guide himself on? Deserts are notoriously devoid of significant landmarks, and they are in a politically chaotic region where nation borders get redrawn all the time. Plus, it was Girard doing all the navigation.
* Why exactly does the Order of the Stick keep assuming the Scribblers are still alive? Okay, one was an elf, but Shojo told them that it's been long enough that Soon died of old age while Shojo ''was a small child''. It has to have been at least 70 years, if not a century, since they went on their quest, and most of them were human.
** How long was Xykon at Dorukan's gate again? Dorukan lived till then, and as for Soon, maybe he was just older than the other humans in the Order.
** Just checked again, and Shojo says it was 66 years previous that the Order of the Scribble began their journey. I'm aware that they certainly ''could'' be alive, I'm just wondering why the Order of the Stick takes it as such a certainty. You figure any of the Scribblers have to be in their 80s if not 90s by now. Durukan at least was a wizard, so living a long time is pretty much a given for them.
*** You don't have to be a wizard to take [https://web.archive.org/web/20131202084044/http://www.systemreferencedocuments.org/resources/systems/pennpaper/dnd35/soveliorsage/epicFeats.html#extended-life-span Extended Life Span]
**** Uhm, magic? Going by D&D books, it isn't that hard to get eternal life(one of the reasons why the aforementioned feat really, really, sucks). High level D&D characters(and especially epic ones) are somewhere between [[Physical God|extremely powerful]] and [[Powers That Be|obscenely powerful]] - cheating death, one way or another, isn't a big deal for them. When you're talking about characters like these it's more reasonable and logical to assume that they are still alive rather than that they died of old age.
*** The main problem with that is the only one they're sure of ''did'' die of old age. You can't assume that they all took Eternal Life feats when A. nobody else in the comic's world seems to have and B. the only Scribbler whose condition they know for certain is the one who is ''dead from old age''.
Line 411:
* Does Elan really have 18 Charisma? Going by the root of the word, he seems much less charismatic than Roy, who as a human gets no racial Charisma bonus and as a fighter has little reason to boost the stat.
** It's a sorta injoke among ''D&D'' players that the Charisma score just governs looks, so that's how it seems to manifest with Elan.
** Actually, Elan has a lot of Charisma (even more than Roy) going by the definition of the word. He can influence almost anyone, to the point that rational people will ignore his flaws just because he is so charming. Yes, he is painfully naive and more than a little stupid, but he can certainly get people to do what he wants them to.
* What is this comic's relationship to the fourth wall? Are the characters [[Animated Actors]]? Do they have [[Medium Awareness]] and sometimes pretend not to, or do they lack [[Medium Awareness]] and sometimes display it in out-of-character, non-canonical jokes? Do they gain and lose [[Medium Awareness]], and if so, is there an in-universe reason for it ([[Rule of Funny]] not counting?) This wouldn't be so bad in a gag-a-day strip, but post-[[Cerebus Syndrome]] it's becoming hard to tell how to react emotionally to events that may or may not be "staged" in-universe.
** The comic where Haley steals the diamond from the Cast page is entitled ''It's a Shame She Didn't Grab That Script While She Was There''. Judging from this, most to all of the characters know that they're ''in'' a comic, but they don't know ''what'' the author has in mind for them or the story. This amounts to some strange sort of [[Enforced Method Acting]].
** It always seemed to me that the know they're in a world that runs on a combination of ''D&D'' rules and narrative conventions, but I certainly wouldn't say that they consider themselves actors or that the events are "staged" in-universe.
** IMO, the most likely setup is similar to a documentary with manipulative editors- the cast are real adventurers on a real quest, but they're being followed around by a 'production team' who will occasionally try to influence events on a smaller scale, either by arranging a particular encounter or giving people instructions on how to act. Maybe.
* From #703: "Hobgoblin Warrior from Strip #433, Panel 3." #433 only has Roy in it, and totals two panels. Did the Giant screw up, or did this troper just get [[Troll|Trolled]]?
Line 436:
** Maybe cuz there were only humans available? Remember what the cartographer said. Kingdoms, 'empires', etc. change hands all the time on the western continent. Every new conquering warlord isn't necessarily going to bring in his or her own full staff of guards, mages, etc. It's more likely that they just kill the ruler, and take over the place wholesale, keeping most of the staff onhand out of convenience.
*** Makes sense. I just figured, since most if not all of the non-slave civilians were lizards... But if they're sort of the [[Old Retainer|Old Retainers]] of the castle (for a given value of "old"), the might have been kept on because they have loyalty to the castle and not to any particular being or species.
** It appears that the entirely human guard is because its commanding officer {{spoiler|Elan and Nale's father Tarquin}}, is a human himself.
** Maybe they [http://www.giantitp.com/comics/oots0413.html only got human figurines] and thought it'd be easier this way?
* The last panel of [http://www.giantitp.com/comics/oots0060.html this strip] seems extremely out of character for Roy, who has at this point already been established to be tactically savvy. His plan involves sending the party's wizard against a drow with SR out the wazoo, his good aligned cleric vs another good aligned cleric, the only other hard hitting melee fighter against the weakest member of the opposition, and ''his'' stupidest and weakest member against the cleverest member of the enemy party. WTF.
Line 442:
** And the enemy cleric is Evil. Just pointing that out...
** Both clerics were out of commission, as evidenced by what Roy said in the ''second to last panel.'' Roy is potentially the only person on his team who can take Thog in one-on-one combat. Nale may be clever, but he's physically and magically on par with Elan. Belkar is going to do what he wants anyway, he might as well be directed properly. And it's good strategy to put your ranged attacker against the flying enemy. As for the drow... who else would you put the wizard up against?
* Redcloak's entire plan is the definition of idiocy. From what I've gathered (I stopped reading shortly after Kubata's death; see [[Dethroning Moment of Suck (Darth Wiki)|Dethroning Moment of Suck]]), he wants to release the Snarl to destroy the world so that the Dark One can blackmail the gods into giving goblins a better role in the next world. Setting aside that he's killing everything alive - ''including goblins'' - for this... According to the backstory, when the Snarl was created, it killed what we would call the Greco-Roman pantheon. What happens to Redcloak's plan if it ''kills the Dark One'' on its next escape? Even if everything goes as planned, the gods in the Stickverse are generally portrayed as petty and not all too bright. Their first response isn't going to be "Wow, we better listen to the goblin god", it's going to be "A goblin destroyed the world?!? ''No more goblins!''" Assuming they still allow them, absolutely nothing guarantees they wouldn't just shove the Dark One aside and still have goblins as a mook race. That Rich Burlew expects us to take such a stupid, ill-thought plan seriously and view Redcloak with sympathy is just fail.
** First thing's first: That's not Redcloak's plan. He ''doesn't want'' to release the Snarl. He wants to ''threaten'' to release it to blackmail the gods; hold a gun to their head and make them give Goblins a fair shake. If he wanted to just release the Snarl, he'd just go around destroying the gates, not capturing them and trying to work a special ritual with Xykon.<br />Actually ''releasing'' the Snarl isn't his Plan A. The only "plan" he's made for doing so amounts to, "If I fuck up, and the Snarl gets released accidentally, then at least when they try to remake the world again, there's already a Goblin god to speak for us."
** Have you actually read the Start of Darkness book? Please go read it before you actually start to complain, no less complaining in a place where you are not supposed to.
Line 453:
*** Because he could just refuse. Nothing indicates that he MUST go along with any challenge that a person makes up on the spot.
* The forums. Holy shit those people are crazy. Make one criticism, legit or no, about the comic, a joke, a character, or (insanely) ''AD&D'' 4e, the first tabletop RPG with a fucking PHYSICS ENGINE, and they detonate on you like a Taliban IED. Worst of all, moderation is ineffective, NEVER timely, and rarely dispensed in anything but a haphazard manner. In 30 years of playing ''D&D'', this troper has NEVER participated in a gaming forum that bad before.
** Really? I think it's actually one of the best gaming forums. There's only a handful of mods, but they do their jobs well.
** I tend to avoid the OOTS forums, but the rest are fine.
** Here are some things of note about the forums. First, a good portion of the community in certain lines of discussion (homebrew, OOTS discussion, and any debate about D&D or D&D rules) is passive aggressive but is relatively harshly cracked down on comments made directly at another poster, which has its ups and downs. Basically, you can strongly disagree with everything somebody does in a way that strongly implies you think they're just plain wrong or stupid, but if you directly say "you're wrong," it's likely to get you flak. The moderation is hidden; scrubbed messages are noted, but who got banned (which is only ever a full permaban, never temporary) is not and you can get warnings or even infractions for messages that are in no way edited by the moderation staff. The moderation response was less timely and some believed it to be biased when there was only one active mod/admin, but it's a bit better now. I wouldn't say the forums are horrible, but in many parts of the community where serious discussion takes place, the passive aggressiveness simmering just below the surface is a lot worse than the mild jabs people take at each other on other forums, and the inability to outright say "you're wrong" hinders discussion. Overall, the community is in no way better or worse than others, just different; if you avoid any argument, it's fine, but if you get into an argument, it's significantly different than at most other forums.
* The colours for the first book and the prequels feel messed up. ''Dungeon Crawlin' Fools'' has Elan and a red theme; red has absolutely nothing to do with Elan beyond the fact that his evil twin brother wears red pants. ''On the Origin of PCs'' has Durkon and a yellow border; yellow has absolutely nothing to do with Durkon. ''Start of Darkness'' has Redcloak and a grey border; the only connection I can make is that it is in greyscale and arguably because it is the most serious OOTS book to date. Yellow would have made more sense for Volume 1 (Elan and Nale are blonds), grey for Volume 0 (Durkon's armour, his so-called "blandness", and being the first and thus far only entirely greyscale OOTS book), and red for Volume -1 for obvious reasons. Now, of course the most likely reason for this is that Mr. Burlew was just picking random colours for Volume 1 and possibly 0, but it still stands out when Volumes 2-4 fit perfectly and red ''would'' fit perfectly for Volume -1.
* Why did they shut down the [[Crack Pairing|Crack Pairings]], [[Fan Service|Fanservice]], and [[Shipping]] threads? Yeah, I get that there was some '[[Moral Guardians|board innapropriate stuff]]' going on, but then they can slap a warning on. Some of that stuff was good! And if they really didn't want to have that stuff on, why can't they let people put in links to where they ended up? (I know that the crack pairings are on FF now, not sure about anyone else.) It turned me off the forums, that's for sure.
** Speaking as a former regular of the crack pairings thread, we had numerous warnings prior to that. Good though it may have been, we crossed a line (and had done so several times before the thread was finally locked). All things considered, I'm amazed we lasted as long as we did. We could have been locked numerous times before we actually were. The mods were exceptionally generous with us, but enough was enough.
* Haley's motivation for adventuring is to collect 200,000 GP to pay off a ransom for her father who is being held captive in a tyrannical police state. Given that recent strips have shown Haley (with a little help from Vaarsuvius) has had no trouble freeing about 23 slaves from a heavily guarded palace, why doesn't she organize a prison break rather than try to raise the exorbitant amount of GP to actually pay the ransom?
** Haley wouldn't be at the level she is now without adventuring. So whether she could actually manage an attempt if she did otherwise is doubtful in itself. Not to mention that sneaking out a few slaves is much easier when you're a guest and can pull an inside job. Pissing off an entire country is probably not a good idea either.
** Plus, she ''doesn't know where he is''. She'd never been to the Western Continent before the current arc, and the first thing she does when she gets there is try to find the place on a map, only to be told it no longer exists. She can't break him out if she can't find him.
** {{spoiler|You may get your wish soon enough.}}
Line 493:
 
* The question why the deities don't personally close the rifts is explained well: in doing so they would need to undo creation and create everything from scratch, possibly freeing the snarl while they try to resew the threads of reality. All well. However, this still does not explain why they don't intervene in protecting the gates. They could just put some impenetrable barriers around them, or at least be able to use higher level traps and monsters to guard them, as what those five mortals were capable.
** The deities seem to have decided that the best way to keep anyone from freeing the Snarl is to prevent anyone from knowing it exists in the first place. Not even the powers of Hell had any clue about its existence until Nale blew it by telling Sabine. While it's certain that the gods could do a better job of protecting the rifts than mortals could, the problem with that is that there is a whole lot of nasty beings who would notice if the gods started overtly messing around in the mortal world for apparently no reason. They'd look into it, the secret would get out, and then you'd have every Evil aligned creature and villain wannabe going after the rifts. Heck, that's the reason they haven't just stomped on Xykon despite him going after the gates at full speed. It's no good stopping someone like Xykon if you're only going to have fifty people like him doing the same thing next week. There's a limit to what the gods can be seen doing concerning the Snarl, so they watch and help The Order of the Stick from behind the scenes when they can.
** Besides, if someone does start abusing the Snarl, there's nothing to stop the gods from hitting the cosmic reset button again.
 
Line 505:
* I'm no expert on slinging bows across one's back, but shouldn't Haley be orienting it in a way so that all the weight isn't on the string?
** Bows typically have a pull weight of something like 20-30 lbs, possibly up to 50 or more. The bow itself isn't going to weigh more than a few pounds, 10 on the outside. It's not going to hurt a bow for someone to hold it or sling it by the string like that.
*** Erm, that's actually pretty much completely wrong. A bow, especially a traditional wooden longbow, should be carried unstrung whenever it's not in use. Better for the bow, and far better for the string. There is a substantial amount of tension involved, even when the bow is at rest. So everything about how she carries the bow is wrong, but ''traditionally'' wrong, in the fantasy artwork sense.
 
* Why Haley didn't let Loki's cleric help Belkar, when she found out it's an effect of his curse? They were in desperate situation and needed all help they could get, teaching Belkar a lesson wasn't reason to keep him inactive and defensless against army of rogues Haley knew, she had no chance.
Line 513:
** OP posting to correct the above statement. Did not take in to account the 'Only within city limits' restriction of the Mark.
 
* Given the deconstruction of [[Always ChaoticExclusively Evil]] and its implications with regards to the monstrous races, how come undead and necromancers seem to be just evil full stop?
** An undead creature is a whole different beast from a member of a monstrous race (like goblins). The latter are natural creatures (or as natural as things get in a world like OOTS-verse), and as such have the full range of behaviors that implies, while an undead creature is literally charged full of negative energy and as such is inherently hostile to all life, whether it likes it or not. Might as well as why all ''fiends'' we've seen have been evil. In fact, Redcloak points this out explicitly to Tsukiko in Strip #830 to explain just why she's so deluded {{spoiler|immediately prior to feeding her to her own wights}}.
 
* If Celia's a pacifist, then why did she shoot lightning at Nale and Thog [http://www.giantitp.com/comics/oots0070.html here]?
Line 524:
** He was taunting Thog to get him to smash the pillars. The rage itself is a game mechanic (Barbarian Rage). It only lasts a certain number of rounds (3+ con modifier), which have presumably passed by then.
*** Ah, I see. I thought the taunting was to somehow make his rage wear off, which didn't make sense. I'm not familiar enough with D&D to recognize the game mechanic. Thanks for the clearing that up.
**** No prob.
 
* Where did the green goblins come from? As Seen here [https://web.archive.org/web/20180321175553/http://www.giantitp.com/comics/oots0701.html\] I didn't think there were any left. If some moved to Gobotopia or whatever, Shouldn't there be more? It just bugs me.
** The goblins from the old dungeon all died, excepting Redcloak. The greenies in Gobbotopia are immigrants, like the kind [http://www.giantitp.com/comics/oots0707.html this guy] got locked up for harassing. The [http://www.giantitp.com/comics/oots0702.html textbook] claims that Gobbotpia's borders are open to all "disenfranchised humanoids", but since the nation was founded by a massive and exclusively hobgoblin army they still represent 93% of the population. It'd probably take a huge mass exodus for them to reach levels above "visible minority" in only a year's time.
 
Line 554:
*** (OP here)Yeah, I figured it was Xykon that was lying (the pause makes his answer very suspicious), but I couldn't really figure out why. But that's a good point, that by admitting that he did give it to Tsukiko, Xykon would have to explain why, and any possible reason would still point to Xykon not trusting Redcloak fully. That explanation works for me.
* Why did Nale have a beard even when he was a baby?
** [[Rule of Funny]]. Also, a quick visual reference for telling him and baby Elan apart (just like the adult versions)- but mostly it's just a visual joke [[Don't Explain the Joke|based on the concept of the]] [[Beard of Evil]].
* According to http://www.giantitp.com/comics/oots0267.html , the paladins had the right to arrest them based on them having to guard the gates in the name of the gods and the gods not having any jurisdiction. Except, well, they're the gods of the south. And is explained later, they really only have jurisdiction in the southern lands.
** Start of Darkness spoiler: {{spoiler|Divine casters are the agents by which gods enact their will in lands not their own, in cases when things that would affect their lands would happen in other lands. The gods agreed to this. However, they can't do special things for them when not in their own lands, so Durkon couldn't use his Thor's Might to increase his speed in the Southern Lands.}}
* In http://www.giantitp.com/comics/oots0661.html, O-Chul easily shrugs off the Mass Hold Person that Xykon casts minutes before. So how come back during the fall of Azure City, he was hit with a Hold Person in the throne room and couldn't break free for ages, causing him to get left behind with the [[Mot D]] when Belkar abandoned him? Shouldn't have been able to break free then?
** In the first one, O-Chul was hit by the Lich's Paralytic Touch ability, which is permanent until dispelled. Mass Hold Person on the other hand, allows a saving throw every round.
*** Oh, I thought he hit him with a Hold Person. That makes more sense then.
*** Xykon flat out says what he's using on O-Chul. "Paralyzing Touch. Heh."
* Is it me, or is Girard Draketooth a bit human-y for someone who is a quarter-dragon? And, judging by Belkar, his smell is also human or a very close approximation.
** He is/was an illusionist. Perhaps he looked more dragon-y, but used his illusions to cover it up in order to blend in better. Might've been able to change his smell, too.
** Alternatively the genetics of cross-breeds in D&D is always a bit weird. It's plausible that quarter-dragons express very few overt draconic traits. In particular his siblings and cousins are also depicted as being fully human and presumably they were not all illusionists.
Line 583:
'''All 3:''' Do-ho-ho-ho-hoh! }}
 
----
:<small>Back to ''[[{{ROOTPAGENAME}}]]''</small>
{{reflist}}
[[Category:Headscratchers{{ROOTPAGENAME}}]]
[[Category:{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]
[[Category:Web Comics/Headscratchers]]
[[Category:The Order of the Stick]]
[[Category:Headscratchers]]
__NOTOC__
[[Category{{DEFAULTSORT:The Order of the Stick]], The}}