Trope Name Injokes: Difference between revisions

m
Convert TVT links to internal links
m (fix broken external links)
m (Convert TVT links to internal links)
Line 241:
* '''[[Hot Blooded|OVERLY HYPED BOLDED, BLUE TEXT EXAMPLE, NEVER WITH ANY EXPLANATION, AND ALWAYS WITH GRATUITOUS EXCLAMATION MARKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!]]'''
** And usually much less verbose than that.
* [http://en.[wikipedia.org/wiki/:Meta |Meta-example]] that needs a Wikipedia-URL to explain in full.
** [http://en.[wikipedia.org/wiki/:Meta |Example]] that doesn't need one, but gets one anyway.
* Example that contains the words "also" or "similar to the above/below" despite the referred-to examples being deleted or moved, making it look very weird.
* Example that looks weird because someone with a vendetta against removed the [[Pothole]] or [[Wiki Word]] without bothering to fix the rest of the sentence.
Line 359:
* I'm not sure if this really counts, but something that may or may not be an example of the trope.
* An example of a rare, unusual variation of this trope that fits.
* Example made by a contributor that doesn't know how to properly [http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/[Pothole |pothole single-word articles]] and uses the external link markup instead.
* Example made by a contributor [[Expy|similar to the above]] that also doesn't understand single-word links and threw in a random capital letter instead.
* Example made by a [http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/WhatAnIdiot[What an Idiot|completely clueless contributor]] that uses the external link markup for a simple pothole despite proper examples of said formatting being all over the source code, easily visible to any editor.
* WHAT? How the heck did we get this far without citing example?! Example practically IS this trope.
* Example that is repeating a previous example, but deleted the first one.