Umineko: When They Cry/WMG/Colored Text: Difference between revisions

m
Convert TVT links to internal links
m (Mass update links)
m (Convert TVT links to internal links)
Line 146:
******* Hold it! Can we really say that Battler was using the red as a detective method in the second game? Let's turn the chessboard around on the most important character in this. Ryukishi. What does Ryukishi have to gain from deceiving us and making Red Truth less valid in the fifth game?
******** {{color|blue|Ryukishi is trolling us.}} {{color|red| In the "Anti-Mystery vs Anti-Fantasy" TIP we're told we can only consider the Red Truth to be valid if we trust Beato. Later in episode four both Battler and Beato choke when trying to make false statements in red.}}{{color|blue|Thereby proving that the idea that the Red Truth could be meaningless was a red harring. If he did suddenly make it meaningless in episode 5 (thereby fitting what was said in "Anti-Mystery vs Anti-Fantasy"), it would serve to troll the entire fanbase.}} Also, {{color|red| Ryukishi has stated the game is solvable with just the first four episode, so it's not like we need the reds from the fifth game to be true.}}
********* {{color|red|Ryukishi is a master of the Mind Screw[http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/MindScrew[Mind Screw|.]]}} For evidence, see his recent statement on the Golden Truth and compare it to Lambda's description in EP1.
** {{color|blue| I will now show that some of the Red Truths made during the fifth game are false.}} {{color|red| The majority of Red Truths concern things that we, the readers, cannot verify. For example we cannot search Kinzo's study for a hidden door. However, Dlanor quotes Knox's Decalogue in red several times. The Decalogue exists in [[Real Life]], and therefore we can check whether her statements about it are true. They aren't.}} {{color|blue| In particular even if we allow for paraphrasing there is absolutely no way Dlanor's claim about Knox's Ninth can be true. Checkmate.}}
*** Knox's 9th isn't a valid point; Knox's 5th is omitted entirely, and the two readings of Knox's 9th really mean the same thing. Even if not, it was already mentioned that people argued over how to interpret or write Knox's Decalogue in the TIPS. Them being different doesn't MEAN anything because there is no OBLIGATION to make it a perfect transcription.