Alternative Character Interpretation/Tabletop Games: Difference between revisions

m
no edit summary
(quote cleanup)
mNo edit summary
Line 46:
*** Chaos isn't good nor evil. It simply is a reflection of Mankind's desires, dreams, and thoughts.
*** The Chaos Space Marines: Vile ravagers in every possible sense, worse even than the ruthless Imperium? Or simply those that, in those dark days, cling to whatever powers they might in order to give themselves a glimmer of hope for bettering their own lot in life? Both?
**** Abaddon the Despoiler: An [[Memetic Mutation|armless, brainless]] [[General Failure]] who could never topple the Imperium or the only person who could unite Chaos against the Imperium.? (of course, he can be both - a great Commissar, but mediocre General) Were the Black Crusades complete and utter failures or merely setting things up for a final assault against the Imperium?
*** The Chaos Gods: Khorne is as much strength and honor as he is bloodshed and violence, Nurgle is as genial and loving and the comfort of the weak and the poor as he is corrupting and pestilent, Slaanesh stands for joy and pleasure to all the senses through art and form as much as outright hedonism, and Tzeentch, while a capricious schemer, could also be said to stand for hope and innovation. These are factual aspects of the characters; they embody positive and negative traits at once.
*** Tzeentch: brutal, traitorous Magnificent Bastard who simply wants destruction, just trying to survive, or enacting a Machiavellian plot to destroy the other Chaos Gods as a ploy to save the sentient races of the galaxy, bringing him into well intentioned extremist territory. Or he could be as caring as Nurgle, except less caring towards his worshipers than the races they originally came from? Truth be told, we know far less about Tzeentch than the other gods, and GW intends to keep it this way, so really, any character interpretation is possible.