American Educational System: Difference between revisions

→‎Security: Added context, more recent examples
m (grammar)
(→‎Security: Added context, more recent examples)
 
Line 193:
 
== Security ==
During the 20th century, school security at most American schools was relatively lax. After the [[Columbine]] massacre in 1999, and especially after Sandy Hook in 2012 and Uvalde in 2022, high schools began taking veryincreasingly strongstronger measures regarding security in an effort to prevent another shooting from taking place. One of the most visible signs of this increase of security was the metal detectors installed at school entrances to prevent students from bringing weapons into the school, and the presence of an armed police officer or hired security guard within the school to deal with such problems. Dress codes were modified to ban trenchcoats and limit the amount of black clothing a student can wear. Especially in the 2000s School administrators began to believe that all shooters fell under a certain list of stereotypes (which often conveniently overlapped with the "[[Loners Are Freaks|shy, bullied loner]]" and the [[Goth]] subculture), and that watchlists could be created for "problem" students before they kill (not unlike terrorist watchlists). Finally, zero-tolerance policies came into effect, with students being suspended or even expelled for violence or the threat of it, or for [[Axes At School|bringing onto school grounds anything that can be used as a weapon]] (even something relatively innocuous, such as scissors). By the 2010s and 2020s, some new schools were being designed to reduce harm in the architecture of the building itself, providing cover and limiting the damage possible in the event of a shooting. In existing buildings it was not uncommon to see what was once an additional entrance shuttered to focus on security measures at a sole checkpoint. Drills were conducted and often taken more seriously. It became a requirement at many schools to use clear backpacks. In some more conservative areas, the topic of arming teachers came up, with some schools doing just that by the 2020s, though not without controversy.
 
These policies quickly became highly controversial, with many people, particularly students and social scientists, feeling that they go too far and violate the First Amendment. A report by the Secret Service stated that schools were taking false hope in such security measures, and that they wouldn't do anything to deter another massacre. Metal detectors? The kids could just be shot at as they wait in line. Scrutiny of goths and loners? The Columbine killers were neither, so singling out those two groups would allowhave simply allowed the real killers to fly under the radar in that case. Zero-tolerance policies? They concluded that such policies may actually backfire, as they could very well drive an unstable student over the edge by getting him or her suspended or expelled for a minor infraction.
After the [[Columbine]] massacre, high schools began taking very strong measures regarding security in an effort to prevent another shooting from taking place. One of the most visible signs of this increase of security was the metal detectors installed at school entrances to prevent students from bringing weapons into the school, and the presence of an armed police officer or hired security guard within the school to deal with such problems. Dress codes were modified to ban trenchcoats and limit the amount of black clothing a student can wear. School administrators began to believe that all shooters fell under a certain list of stereotypes (which often conveniently overlapped with the "[[Loners Are Freaks|shy, bullied loner]]" and the [[Goth]] subculture), and that watchlists could be created for "problem" students before they kill (not unlike terrorist watchlists). Finally, zero-tolerance policies came into effect, with students being suspended or even expelled for violence or the threat of it, or for [[Axes At School|bringing onto school grounds anything that can be used as a weapon]] (even something relatively innocuous).
 
These policies quickly became highly controversial, with many people, particularly students and social scientists, feeling that they go too far and violate the First Amendment. A report by the Secret Service stated that schools were taking false hope in such security measures, and that they wouldn't do anything to deter another massacre. Metal detectors? The kids could just be shot at as they wait in line. Scrutiny of goths and loners? The Columbine killers were neither, so singling out those two groups would allow real killers to fly under the radar. Zero-tolerance policies? They concluded that such policies may actually backfire, as they could very well drive an unstable student over the edge by getting him or her suspended or expelled for a minor infraction.
 
----