Blacktail Defense: Difference between revisions

← Older edit

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Revision as of 13:53, 19 January 2017 view source Looney Toons (talk \| contribs) Automoderated users, Autopatrolled users, Bureaucrats, Comment administrators, Confirmed users, Forum administrators, Interface administrators, Moderators, Rollbackers, Administrators 117,387 edits work->creator, creatortropes, markup ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 18:56, 17 September 2018 view source Looney Toons (talk \| contribs) Automoderated users, Autopatrolled users, Bureaucrats, Comment administrators, Confirmed users, Forum administrators, Interface administrators, Moderators, Rollbackers, Administrators 117,387 edits m fix bogus redlinks
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: {{creator}} [[Blacktail Defense]] is a [[~~Youtube~~YouTube]] user who is an armor specialist, and shares his knowledge with the world in the form of slideshows. The majority of his work is built around making technical flaws known. His works include: Line 12: * [[Crippling Overspecialization]]: He is quick to admit that American vehicles are really good against enemy tanks - but generally not so good against everything else. This is also why some of the vehicles in the Failed Tanks series are considered as such. * [[Epic Fail]]: His two-part series on the M247 Sergeant York turned out to be about how the York was this - revealing incidents where the machine ''fired on its own spectators'', among other incidents. * [[Flat What]]: Prompted by use of the Dramatic Prairie Dog's them, when he stated that {{spoiler\|the T-55 AMV was an all-around better tank than the ~~[[M 1 A 2]]~~M1A2 SEP, even though the ~~[[M 1 A 2]]~~M1A2 was better against other tanks.}} * [[Ironic Echo]]: Blacktail will frequently use the very same words used by the proponents of the vehicles he's deriding to support said vehicle, after a long presentation on why that vehicle is bad.