Just Eat Gilligan: Difference between revisions

Rescuing 2 sources and tagging 0 as dead. #IABot (v2.0beta9)
(Rescuing 2 sources and tagging 0 as dead. #IABot (v2.0beta9))
Line 162:
*** The sad thing being that, in the pilot episode, Neelix was comic relief, but he was ''competent'' comic relief. He owned his own starship, was a combat-hardened veteran, was a successful businessman, and had the stones to manipulate the Voyager crew into being weapons against his enemies. Next episode, he suddenly becomes the [[The Scrappy/Live Action TV|Scrappy]].
*** He's not just put in charge of morale, but also of ''cooking'', of all things. His [[Lethal Chef|food is so awful]] that in one episode he actually ''poisons'' the ship with his cooking fumes. Not the ship's crew, but the ''actual ship itself.''
*** In [httphttps://wwwweb.archive.org/web/20120209041526/http://sfdebris.com/voyager/e835.asp "Investigations"] Neelix conducts a rogue investigation, makes an accusation using weak evidence, and violates the privacy of fellow crew members.
*** A [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MMHzOjggHoA youtube] clip on how Neelix should have been handled in the series.
*** In the episode [http://www.reviewboy.com/memorial.html "Memorial"] Neelix is more overbearing than usual. He insists that a [http://en.memory-alpha.org/wiki/Memorial_(episode) memorial] that transmits [https://web.archive.org/web/20120117003745/http://sfdebris.com/voyager/e936.asp painful] memories into others be left active. The only person who supports him is Janeway.
*** What makes the above example even more ridiculous is that his reaction to experiencing those traumatising memories was to hallucinate, pick up a phaser and hold Naomi hostage in the Mess Hall, believing he was protecting children in a combat-zone. It took a while for Tuvok to talk him down. And that is one of the memories you want someone ''else'' to remember? The poor sod who next undergoes that could easily kill half of his crew, blow a hole in the side of the ship or get himself shot!
*** Also, is asking someone who witnessed the destruction of his homeworld, and has demonstrated long-lasting psychological scars from that event on more than one occasion, really the best person to give advice on subjecting people's mental health to images of a massacre? You'd think, given his background, he'd be against this?!