Automoderated users, Autopatrolled users, Bureaucrats, Comment administrators, Confirmed users, Forum administrators, Interface administrators, Moderators, Rollbackers, Administrators
116,199
edits
Mission: Impossible (film)/Headscratchers: Difference between revisions
Mission: Impossible (film)/Headscratchers (view source)
Revision as of 02:04, 12 March 2016
, 8 years agoremoved Category:Mission Impossible; added Category:Mission: Impossible (film) using HotCat
(→''Mission: Impossible - Ghost Protocol'': clean up) |
Looney Toons (talk | contribs) m (removed Category:Mission Impossible; added Category:Mission: Impossible (film) using HotCat) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 28:
** Bogdan. That is, I don't think Bogdan ''told'' them, but they knew he and Ethan broke out of prison together, and were presumably keeping tabs on him in case he could lead them to Ethan.
* Wouldn't NORAD's radar detect an SRBM incoming towards San Francisco?
** I was secretly hoping for that too. Perhaps NORAD had just installed a new detection system and when they saw a single nuclear missile heading towards the US they assumed it was an error, since a preemptive nuclear strike would be all-out. They ignored it rather than do a retaliatory launch. [
* When the team realized the Russian cryptographer/scientist/nuclear codes guy was in Dubai, why not just let the meeting take place, than follow Winstrom and Moreau and capture them later, rather than take the risks of being recognized by following the original plan?
* Is this movie just assuming there are absolutely no missile defense systems in the United States? And why even attack the United States with ONE nuke? If your goal is nuclear holocaust, wouldn't it make more sense to deploy multiple missiles to targets that don't have any defense systems or organized teams set out to foil you?
Line 35:
{{reflist}}
[[Category:Mission: Impossible (film)]]
[[Category:Headscratchers]]
__NOTOC__
| |||