Overshadowed by Controversy: Difference between revisions

Rescuing 1 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.8.7
m (grammar)
(Rescuing 1 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.8.7)
Line 157:
 
== [[Real Life]] ==
* A particular style of shoe sold by C. & J. Clark, one of the largest shoe manufacturing firms in the UK, became this<ref>[https://www.bbc.com/news/business-40916607 Clarks in sexism row over Dolly Babe girls' shoe - BBC News]</ref> when an angry mother made a rant not just about how easily worn out the "Dolly Babe" Mary Jane school shoes were, but the [[Political Correctness Gone Mad|shoes' name itself]] being "sexist" and "promoting gender stereotypes" with its [[All Women Love Shoes|overly feminine design]]–a lavender heart-print insole and a heart-shaped charm on the toebox. Not helping matters was that the "Dolly Babes" were compared unfavourably to the football-themed "Leader" shoes for boys, also made by the same company. [[Serious Business]] ensued, and as a result Clarks issued an apology, stating that it wasn't their intention to offend, and withdrew the shoes in question from sale; they did briefly re-release<ref>[https://www.charlesclinkard.co.uk/girls-c23/school-shoes-c71/cla-dolly-babe-jnr-p23607 Clarks Movello Lo Junior Girls School Shoes]</ref> the style [[Same Face, Different Name|under the name]] "Movello Lo"<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20180818015227/http://www.mumzworld.com/en/clarks-movello-lo Clarks - Movello Lo]</ref> presumably to clear out existing inventory, though. They would later commit to designing and selling "gender-neutral" school shoes, which presumably also had a side-effect of being more acceptable in certain schools where dress codes are stringently observed. It's not that Clarks hasn't come up with anything appealing to girls in recent years though, like the "Etch Bright" shoes for girls with its sparkly purple insole and star accents,<ref>[https://www.clarks.co.uk/c/Etch-Bright-Kid/p/26151125 Etch Bright Kid Black Patent]</ref> or the "Sea Shimmer" Mary Janes with a prominent mermaid theme,<ref>[https://www.clarks.co.uk/c/Sea-Shimmer-Kid/p/26155543 Sea Shimmer Kid Black Patent]</ref> but by then people may have forgotten about the sexism row with the shoemaker and moved on to the next scapegoat.
** British supermarket chain Tesco wasn't spared from a similar controversy either, when a range of school shoes got slammed by a teacher<ref>[https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-4777936/Teacher-slams-Tesco-selling-sexist-school-shoes.html Teacher slams Tesco for selling 'sexist' school shoes]</ref> for its alleged use of gender stereotypes most especially the "sensitive soles" on the girls' shoes with a pink butterfly design on the soles in question. Surprising they didn't take their aim at Italian children's footwear brand Lelli Kelly for selling girls' shoes with gaudy and flamboyantly feminine, if not infantile, designs, which has become something of a [[Snark Bait|running joke]] for those in the UK who have been subjected to cringe-worthy commercials promoting said brand.
* The Ford Pinto was an economy car deserving of merit, if not for its [[Achilles' Heel]] that is the gas tank flaw which [[Every Car Is a Pinto|made the car combust in a rear-end collision]], and the subsequent controversy ensuing from it. Ford reportedly decided that paying out on wrongful-death lawsuits would be cheaper than fixing it.