Quote Mine: Difference between revisions

Line 207:
* On the day of a massive public sector strike, [[Top Gear|Jeremy Clarkson]] was booked on BBC's ''The One Show'' in which [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NuuDnqSPnhA he made comments] that he would execute strikers... [http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2011/dec/01/jeremy-clarkson-one-show-strike as part of a joke] about the BBC's [[Golden Mean Fallacy|obsession with balance]]; Clarkson himself was pretty neutral on the strikes. Of course, everyone latched onto the joke acting as if, for once, he was being serious.
** Apart from Number 10, which issued a statement saying: "Those who have made the regrettable decision to strike may be assured: Executions are not government policy."
* Anti-religious critics, skeptics and [[The Fundamentalist|atheist fundamentalists]] occasionally quote-mine the Scriptures of thevarious religions they're criticizing (the most popular targets arebeing the Bible and the Qu'ran). One of many examples is done with Luke 19:27 "But those enemies of mine who did not want me to be king over them-bring them here and kill them in front of me." This verse is from the Parable of the Ten Minas, where Jesus explains what the coming of the Kingdom of God is like and the importance of making the most of life, with the verse in question representing God's future and final judgement for humanity with the killing an allegory of the eternal damnation of those who reject God. The quote mine is to treat the verse as a call to arms for Christians, despite it being the words of a fictional character in one of Jesus' parables. Numerous anti-religious outlets have based arguments around this specific quote mine, the most high profile example being Sam Harris, one of the founders of the New Atheist movement; Sam Harris later acknowledged and withdrew the argument, but not before numerous Christian [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ENtlW-LEqu8 apologists] called the mistakeargument out.
* A common tactic by creationists is to quote mine [[On The Origin Of Species]], specifically, the part where [[Charles Darwin]] talks about how absurd it seems that the eye could have evolved. The quote mine is leaving out the second paragraph, wherein he explains exactly why eye evolution is perfectly reasonable.
** The Quote Mine, "To suppose that the eye, with all its inimitable contrivances for adjusting the focus to different distances, for admitting different amounts of light, and for the correction of spherical and chromatic aberration, could have been formed by natural selection, seems, I freely confess, absurd in the highest possible degree."
248

edits