Revision as of 18:50, 13 June 2021 (view source) Lequinni (talk \| contribs) m (→‎Film) ← Older edit		Revision as of 05:03, 1 July 2021 (view source) Ogleguy2000 (talk \| contribs) No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 71: The prequel trilogy is a pretty big step down from the beloved original trilogy. ''[[The Phantom Menace]]'', the first installment of the prequel trilogy, gets a lot of flak from fans for the introduction of the infamous Jar Jar Binks, overuse of CGI and Jake Lloyd's performance as Anakin Skywalker. ''[[Attack of the Clones]]'', the second installment, isn't much better, if not worse than ~~''The~~its ~~Phantom Menace''~~predecessor, with main criticism going towards the weak and forced Anakin/Padme love story, Anakin's general emo-ness in that film in particular and the perceived stiffness of Hayden Christensen's performance. However, some consider to be a slight improvement over the first prequel. ''~~While~~However, [[Revenge of the Sith]]'', the third and final installment, is ~~considered~~a ~~to be an~~significant improvement over the first two prequels for being more on par with the original trilogy, better visuals and Hayden Christensen improving on his performance from the last prequel~~, it nevertheless isn't safe from receiving flak~~. Prior to the prequel trilogy, most fans considered ''[[Return of the Jedi]]'' to be the weakest film of the original trilogy, though it is still well liked. *The sequel trilogy, consisting of ''[[The Force Awakens]], [[The Last Jedi]]'' and ''The Rise of Skywalker'' have [[Broken Base\|widely varying opinions among fans.]] Some consider it to be an improvement from the prequel trilogy, some consider it to be just as problematic, and others even consider the prequels to be superior.

Seasonal Rot: Difference between revisions

Seasonal Rot (view source)

Revision as of 05:03, 1 July 2021