Automoderated users, Autopatrolled users, Bureaucrats, Comment administrators, Confirmed users, Forum administrators, Interface administrators, Moderators, Rollbackers, Administrators
116,624
edits
Shipping/Headscratchers: Difference between revisions
m
markup fix
(clean up) |
Looney Toons (talk | contribs) m (markup fix) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{
* There are some fanon ships that I just don't see any subtext between. Take Arnold and Helga, Helga's affection for Arnold is canon (needless to say) but for those who think Arnold likes her back but I just don't see it. Arnold has always been overt with his crushes (Ruth, Ms. Felter, Lila, even Hilda in his dream). What indication is there that Arnold likes Helga?
** Also Kim Possible and She-go, I'm not blind to slash subtext (especially the Ben 10 love triangle) but this one doesn't work either too me.
** Ships aren't based so much on indicative subtext so much as which characters the fanbase wants to see together. Subtext is usually a secondary factor, [[Shipping Goggles|or just entirely made up.]]
* Any and all [[Ship Sinking]]. I mean it. Especially in this day and age when the creators know
** Um, not to push any buttons, but what if the author didn't intend to make that scene a [[Ship Sinking]], and some of these are simply overreactions to already-planned plot points? It's not hard to believe that such-and-such WAS going to hook up with such-and-such, and the scene that shows that just happens to enrage the fandom to thinking it was a last-ditch [[Take That]].
*** Besides, for ''real'' people, there are people they would never ever have sex/a romantic relationship with, and they would often feel shock, bafflement, disgust, etc., at the idea. So why shouldn't fictional characters feel that way? It's legitimate characterization. And in real life, people sometimes have to be reassured that someone's relationship with their sweetie is totally platonic (And to go with the HP example, Ron was already shown to be somewhat insecure). Why shouldn't it come up in fiction? I don't think authors should have to carefully avoid discrediting any pairings or showing them in a negative light just because it might upset people who like those pairings.
Line 14:
** Because an author has a story that they want to tell or a point they want to make, and sometimes this involves disappointing some people. You can't please everyone. In any case, the author in a way has a 'shipping' preference as well - and since they're the one actually writing the official stories, their preference comes first. That's just the way it is. You don't like it, then sorry but that's tough - that's why there's fanfiction.
*** Furthermore, 'Death of the Author' aside (and I'm not someone who automatically subscribes to that viewpoint, but that's another discussion), why should the reader's demands outweigh the story that the author wants to tell anyway? The author's the one making it up, not the reader, and just because someone reads a story and enjoys it doesn't mean they know how to tell the story in the best way. Sometimes the wrong ending for a shipper is the right ending for the story.
**** Exactly. One complaint I saw lodged at [[Russell T. Davies]] was that "you aren't writing [[Torchwood]] for the fans, you're writing it for yourself!". Well, duh. You have to write for yourself. What's the point in writing something you wouldn't want to read/watch?
** Well, I can kind of see the rationale on this one. Imagine that you write a story. And in that story you carefully develop a romantic subplot. You come to identify with your characters and you're happy that they're happy together. And then you go on the Internet and you discover that there is a segment of people who are deliberately breaking up your pairing to create their own which totally conflict with the way you see your characters. Wouldn't you be tempted to use your Author Powers? Just a little bit? Especially if it's persistently done by people whom you've repeatedly told their pairing of choice just isn't happening-yours is?
*** Not to mention the fact that there is a certain amount of inherent arrogance involved in Shipping -- or rather, the more extreme version of Shipping, in which Ship is stated to be superior than the author's own construction -- in the first place since you're essentially suggesting to the author of the text that you know what's better for their story and characters than they do. That has to grate.
Line 21:
** Perhaps when a writer is finishing the end of their work, they want to put their foot down a bit and make things totally, utterly clear to everyone in the ending so you don't get endless bickering after it ends. After you finish a work and move on, do you ''really'' want to keep being bothered about this plot or that pairing? So they just write how Alice and Bob got together and Charlie was just a crush, ''the end''.
** Basically, you're arguing for ambiguity. You want the author to leave you some wiggle room, so that your particular fantasies about the work in question would still be available. Well, what if the wiggle room you already have is considered a mistake? What if the wiggle room you have doesn't actually exist in the work, and is just a fiction created by your own mind. Take Harry/Hermione. This ship does not exist. Read the first 6 books; it simply is not there. Harry's alone-time with Hermione is generally him getting advice, her getting advice, them engaged in action, or him being bored. They do not mesh as a couple. The ship was never sunk, because it never ''set sail''. All Deathly Hallows did was to take everything Rowling had ''already'' written about them and put it on one page, so that it could not be ignored or rationalized away. Not all ship sinking works like this; sometimes it is just the author smacking his more imaginative fans. But in this case, the ship was delusional.
** I just do it because [[Complete Monster|I like]] [[For the Evulz|making you]] [[Chaotic Evil|teenage girls]] [[Jerk
** "an outright [[Take That]] to part of your own fanbase, which is '''exactly'' what J.K. Rowling did in [[Harry Potter|Book 7]]!" It's called plot, genius. What, did you think she was just going to leave it ambiguous? That would have pissed off even more people.
* I'm curious about [[Die for Our Ship]] and related tropes. How did something that started as a genuine experiment ("what if this character dated ''this'' character instead?") become a discomforting pseudo-[[Martyrdom Culture]]?
Line 27:
* I enjoy crack ships and non-canon pairings as much as the next normal, mild-mannered person. However, I don't see what's so evil about ''liking'' canon pairings. I don't get why the mere fact that Kataang and Maiko are my preferred ships makes me a drooling canon-whore who can't think outside the box, according to some people. I like the way it all turned out, okay? Why is that so wrong?
** Well, with the Avatar situation, it could be simply that a lot of certain fans are really, really butthurt about their preferred pairing not being canon. This doesn't really happen outside of the internet, though. I've noticed that the people least likely to participate in online fandom are the ones who are most frequently on the mark about the storytelling.
* Mostly out of curiosity, are there any fandoms at all where the [[Fan
** Most likely. You just don't hear about them because there's no big uproar from the crazies about how the author just didn't see the "true" pairing. There's probably a general agreement between authors and fans if there's not much to choose from, either. ''[[The Nightmare Before Christmas]]'', for example, is the only fandom I'm in that has the majority of the fans ship the canon couple. Can't think of others, though.
** In general, ''[[Castle]]'' fandom seems fairly unified with the writers behind Castle / Beckett.
* Not to push any buttons, but the ''entire concept of shipping''. I've always read/watched/played books/comics/films/shows/games for the story first (yes, even for the games) and everything else second, and the creator of a work, while I occasionally disagree with them- and in the single case of [[Star Wars]] siding with EU canon supporters against George Lucas- respect their word over others. I'm a writer myself, and I find it silly to speculate on romantic angles that have not come up yet, preferring to go into every development without assumptions if I can help it, and just going along for the ride. I make up for this "void" of no shipping by speculating about symbolism/philosophy, but that's neither here nor there. WHY DOES EVERYONE HAVE TO FOCUS SO MUCH ON ROMANCE IN STORIES? If it's blatantly in the story, that's one thing, but speculation to me seems just...a waste of time, and when I run into fans of works (and this includes my friends) I just don't understand why they're so determined to put things into romantic contexts. I mean GAH!
** Well, romance can be useful to give characters relatable desires and motivations, and even a goldmine for humor or character development. In fact, romance CAN easily drive the plot of a story when done right. Speculations about how people feel is just nonverbal communication 101, (even if lots of people who frequent net forums tend to be poor at this) because most of the important information about people isn't said with words. Humans are mentally and emotionally complex social animals. But there are also lots of people who care a lot because they have empty lives and emotionally hollow imaginations, and hence need an "ideal" pairing to worship that goes way beyond simple well adjusted appreciation of beautiful, heartwarming story telling.
** Like I said, I get that romance can be important in stories, and when the writer puts it in- and is a decent writer without having characters [[Strangled
*** The reason is fun. There's a lot of things people do with fiction that is, strictly speaking, a waste of time. Some people are artists and sketch out various improbable situations or jokes. Some people are writers and try to make up various scenarios that they think would be cool. Some people are thinkers and try to eke out a metaphor or deeper meaning within the world. Some people are romantics that like the fuzzies of seeing huggies and smoochies in action. Why do they all do it? 'Cause it's fun to them. If you don't like it, that's cool.
*** Personally, I would define shipping as a ''major'' waste of time. Why get so worked up about something that's not even part of a main plot, let alone the B-plot or C-plot? If you tried to judge a show based on the fandom, you'd think most forms of entertainment these days are adaptations of Harlequin romance novels. Look at the Avatar: The Last Airbender fandom, they're so focused on shipping that many of them don't even ''care'' about the actual story!
| |||