39,327
edits
What Do You Mean It's Not Didactic?: Difference between revisions
What Do You Mean It's Not Didactic? (view source)
Revision as of 09:39, 18 January 2014
, 10 years agoConvert TVT links to internal links
m (Mass update links) |
m (Convert TVT links to internal links) |
||
Line 39:
** ...elsewhere in the book, she and her girlfriend analyze several children's books (e.g. ''[[James and The Giant Peach]]'') [[Satire Parody Pastiche|for their "erotic undertones".]]
* ''[[Watchmen (Comic Book)|Watchmen]]'' gets this treatment quite a bit, as does ''[[Kingdom Come]]'' and ''[[The Sandman]]''.
* There is an infamous book, "''[
Line 182:
* ''[[Homestar Runner (Web Animation)|Homestar Runner]]'' of all things is given this treatment by [[The Wiki Rule|The Homestar Runner Wiki]].
* [[Confused Matthew]] argues in his epilogue to his No Country for Old Men review that it, and 2001, were created cynically for these sort of people. Didactic elements were peppered into the film in place of characters, dialogue or plot. YMMV of course.
* Invoked, Exaggerated and of course {{spoiler|[[Played for Laughs]]}} [[On This Very Wiki]] [
* Mocked in the [[Whateley Universe]] when Phase takes a World Literature class on the epic. The papers written on the classical Greek and Roman epics are all flamed by fellow student Majestic. Who happens to be the incarnation of Hera/Juno and ''might actually know more about this than anyone else in the class''.
| |||