Tanks, But No Tanks: Difference between revisions

quote markup, replaced redirect with direct link to work, italics and link markup on work names, missing words, run-on sentences, spelling errors, grammar, usage
(Added more examples)
(quote markup, replaced redirect with direct link to work, italics and link markup on work names, missing words, run-on sentences, spelling errors, grammar, usage)
Line 1:
{{trope}}
{{quote|'''Skinner''': "Tanks? Oh come on, this is ''too'' inaccurate!"
'''Professor Frink''': "[[Wild Wild West|Then you're going to hate my]] [[Steampunk|steam-powered]] [[Spider Tank|super spider]], [[Oh God, with the Verbing!|with the crushing and]] [[Jerry Lewis|the stomping and the webs made of NYYYLONNN!!]]"|''[[The Simpsons]]''}}
|''[[The Simpsons (animation)|The Simpsons]]''}}
 
Writers often play fast and loose when it comes to vehicles. They are usually [[Just Plane Wrong]], and use [[Artistic License Ships|artistic license when it comes to ships]]. This applies to armoured vehicles as much as anything else, either getting details wrong or using stand-ins.
Line 20 ⟶ 21:
 
{{examples}}
== [[Anime]] and [[Manga]] ==
* An odd example occurs in ''[[Martian Successor Nadesico]]'' when the Mecha pilots battle alien-possessed WWII German Tiger tanks from an abandoned tank factory [[Critical Research Failure|in Kursk, Russia]].
* Another example occurs in ''[[009-1]]'': Tigers again, this time in an unspecified "eastern block" country.
Line 37 ⟶ 38:
* Averted in ''[[Lord of War]]''. Not only were the tanks in one scene all real, but they were all sold right after filming completed. The scene actually had to be rushed because the arms dealer they were borrowing the tanks from had an unexpected buyer.
* Many movies where a variant of an M1 Abrams tank makes an appearance are likely using convincingly mocked up [[wikipedia:Centurion tank|Centurion]] tanks. Especially if said movies are not [[Backed by the Pentagon]].
** Even though ''[[Transformers (film)|Transformers]]'' was actually [[Backed by the Pentagon]], they still had to use retired M60 Pattons for the tank depot at SOCENT. Indeed, there is no real Abrams in the film, the Decepticon Brawl who appears to be have the Abrams as his Alternative Mode is really the same Abrams mock-up from ''[[xXx: State of the Union]]'' (built using commercial vehicle parts) with some additional visual mods tacked on.<ref>Specifically the film crew added two four -shot missile pods on the second turret, a mine plow on the front and a woodland camouflage paint scheme. </ref> This is most obvious when he goes to run over a car in the final battle and he only takes out the roof and windows without pancaking the thing like a real Abrams would.
** [[Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen|The Sequel]] did have actual an Abrams used for the finale, but the trope still pops up when the Marines arrive with Army M2 Bradleys.
* Overlapping with [[Just Plane Wrong]], the American military vehicles in ''[[Mars Attacks!]]'' are all Russian and European. This is because the film was denied backing by the real-life military, apparently because they weren't happy that the [[Brown Note|Indian Love Call]] song was depicted as being more effective at defeating the Martians than the military.
* Famously averted in the Steven Spielberg comedy ''[[1941]]'' which used an accurate full-scale replica of an M3 medium tank built on the chassis of another one of the huge family of M3/M4 based vehicles. Just another reason why this movie went so spectacularly over budget.
Line 45 ⟶ 46:
* Averted in Finnish war film [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0378848/ Tali-Ihantala 1944]. The tanks used on filming the movie were ''the actual individual tanks which had participated in the real life battle 1944'' and been stored in Parola Tank Museum, Finland, and restored back to working condition by volunteer enthusiasts.
* ''[[The Pentagon Wars]]'', which is a humorous retrospective on the development and the Bradley IFV (as well as all the waste, corruption and sillyness that went on in the Pentagon during it) was evidently not [[Backed by the Pentagon]] - while the schematics seem to correspond, the actual "Bradleys" being tested throughout the movie look more like Soviet [[BT Rs]], and were most likely just 8-wheel flatbed trailers with a cardboard structure on top.
** This trope is even lampshaded in-universe where one of the designers is reluctant to add a turret to the Bradley because it would be mistaken for a tank by the enemy and thus be a priority target -- ''the last thing'' you want for a vehicle designed to transport troops.
* In the "real close, but not quite" we have the classic "starring Bogart" ''Sahara''. "Lulubelle" is an actual M3 tank, which is appropriate to the period (the Gazala battles), and several of the American training crews did end up getting into battle (on the "wrong" side of Africa). The problem is, it's a Lee (the US Army version), not a Grant (British version, the turret design's the give away). The Brits did get Lee'sLees by Lend-Lease later, but not during those battles.
* ''[[To Hell and Back]]'', the [[Reality Is Unrealistic|semi-true]] autobiography of [[Audie Murphy]]'s [[WW 2]] service, has him jump into a burning M4 Sherman to fire its .50 caliber [[BFG|machine gun]] at German troops, in the action that earned him the Medal of Honor. He actually jumped into an M10 Tank Destroyer, although the two are very similar (The M10 Wolverine Tank Destroyer was based on the Sherman.)
* The movie ''[[Stripes]]'' presents us with a scene set behind the [[Iron Curtain]], in which a "Russian" tank menaces some of the heroes. It is clearly an M60 series tank with a few visual mods tacked on.
* Averted in Sam Peckinpah's ''[[Cross of Iron]]'', which used real, Yugoslav-made, T-34s in several scenes. Although the models used would be slighty anarchronistic for the 1943 the film is set in.
 
== [[Live -Action TV]] ==
* ''[[Hogan's Heroes]]''. The episode "One Army at a Time" used an American M7 Priest self-propelled artillery vehicle painted up in German colors to represent a generic German AFV. It was a good choice because the Priest is an obscure enough vehicle that most of the viewing public (particularly back when the show first came out) wouldn't know what it really was... The same Priest had, however, previously tried to stand in for a Tiger tank in an earlier episode called "Hold That Tiger", which wasn't such a good choice as the two look nothing alike...
* Subverted in ''[[Space: Above and Beyond]]''. In the episode ''Pearly'', the Marines of the 58th Reconnaissance Squadron, AKA "The Wildcards", are in danger of being overrun by enemy forces when they take shelter inside an [[Awesome Personnel Carrier]]. Only thing is, the driver of the vehicle keeps insisting that it is in fact a tank. Aside from that, by all appearances, Pearly ''should'' probably be considered an APC, since it's relatively roomy inside with space for a squad of Marines to ride around in it.
Line 57 ⟶ 58:
* One ''[[Adam-12]]'' episode had a scene where the boys pulled over an M8 armored car only to discover that it was duly registered and thus perfectly legal to drive on the street. However, both the boys and the owner, who presumably should have known better, kept referring it as a "tank" throughout the entire scene.
* The "German" halftracks in ''[[The Rat Patrol]]'' were all American halftracks in German markings.
* ''[[The Dukes of Hazzard]]'' episode ''"Follow That Still''" mostly averts this trope with M113 APC being played by a real M113. and itIt does get referred to as an armored personnel carrier to the point that it borders on [[Insistent Terminology]] but it gets called a tank twice (though to be fair one of the people who calls it that is [[The Ditz|Roscoe]]) and the fact the cannon is still functional despite it being surplus purchased for a museum. In real life, any cannon on a decommissioned military vehicle would be sealed at the breech so it can't be fired again; in the show hasit just givenhas an easily -removable spike in the barrel.
* A Challenger I showed up in ''[[Doctor Who]]'' as part of the forces who shoot down the Racnoss mothership. While such modern vehicles are rare to see in fictional media - ''especially'' science-fiction - Challengers, as main battle tanks, are not exactly optimised for anti-aircraft duties.
* ''[[The Walking Dead]]'' features a (surprisingly clean, all things considered - shouldn't it be covered in bits of zombie?) British Chieftain standing in for an abandoned M1 Abrams. This is most obvious because of a scene where Rick climbs in the tank through the belly hatch. The CheiftainChieftain has that but the Abrams does not as it sacrificed hull integrity.
** Later, when {{Spoiler|Thethe Governor attacks the prison mid-way through Season 4,}} he is assisted by a M60 Patton which has been retired from service since the 90's90s. They handwave it by having the driver bringing it from Fort Benning; it would only be there as a museum piece which would mean it wouldn't have a functioning gun.
* Averted major-lymajorly in the miniseries ''[[Band of Brothers (TV series)|Band of Brothers]]''. The Allied tanks were genuine M4A1 Shermans and A27 Cromwells, the armored cars were genuine M8 Greyhounds, the halftracks were genuine M5s. On the German side, they used the Czech-built, German-designed halftracks and the replica Marders and Tigers from ''[[Saving Private Ryan]],'' along with very convincing replica Jadgpanthers and Sturmgeschutz IIIs built on British FV432 APC chassis.
* Likewise averted in the follow-on miniseries ''[[The Pacific]]'', though in this case the reasonably accurate Japanese tanks had to be created using CGI due to a lack of surviving originals.
 
Line 67 ⟶ 68:
* ''[[Company of Heroes]]'' has the M26 Pershing tank available to American forces in Normandy circa June 1944. Historically, it did not see action until February 1945, and then in tiny numbers for field testing. The [[Expansion Pack]] ''Opposing Fronts'' features a Bergetiger Recovery Vehicle, of which exactly ''one'' was ever used in real life. This has lead to theories that it was used for something completely different.
* ''[[Battlefield Play4Free]]'' has the so-called "light tanks", which are actually LAV-25 & BTR-90 [[Awesome Personnel Carrier|APC]]s.
** The ''Battlefield'' series has been guilty of this trope since the original game. ''Battlefield 1942'' has only one real heavy tankstank for the Heavy Tank class -- the infamous [[Nazis With Gnarly Weapons|Tiger I]],; the Red Army's Heavy Tank is the T-34/76 Medium Tank which is treated as having better armor and a better gun than its Medium Tank counterpart the T-34-85 (Whichwhich actually has a larger gun and turret and the same armor),; while the Allies get the M10 Wolverine Tank Destroyer (which has a bigger gun than its medium counterpart the Sherman but the same armor as it is built on the same hull),. the The ''Road To Rome'' expansion added the Armored Car class which used the M3 Grant and Carro Armato M11/39 Medium Tanks for the Allies and Italians respectively. The base game also axishas Axis factions sharing armored vehicles when any such activity was far less extensive than the Allies' Lend-Lease Agreement. The ''Secret Weapons of WWII'' expansion has the M8 Greyhound Armored Car in the Medium Tank category for the British Commandos.
** ''Battlefield: Vietnam'' put both M50 Ontos Tank Destroyer and the M551 Sheridan ARAAV as Lights Tanks. To be fair, however, the Ontos does fill the Tank Destroyer niche in-game complete with an NVA/Viet Cong counterpart listed as a Scout Car, and the Sheridan is a light tank in all but name.<ref>The Sheridan isn't called a light tank due to internal politics. First it was referred to as a reconnaissance vehicle because it looklooked better than having two tanks (the other being the failed MBT-70 program) in the ledgers given to Congress and; later, the Armored Reconnaissance Amphibious/Airborne Vehicle designation was created to avoid calling it a light tank as the current doctrine was focused on Main Battle Tanks being the only tanks.</ref>
** ''Battlefield 2: Modern Combat'' has the Middle Eastern Coalition using the 2S25 Sprut-SD Tank Destroyer as their tank. Even weirder is that the original PC version of the game had them using more apporiateappropriate T-90s. and theyThey had a model for T-72s from the above mentionedabovementioned ''Battlefield: Vietnam'' but they went for the Sprut which is only used by the [[Russians With Rusting Rockets|VDV]]. They also have the BMP-2 IFV as a light tank and the BMD-3 IFV is used in the same capacity by the [[Chinese With Chopper Support|PLA]].
** ''[[Battlefield: Bad Company]]'' erroneously has the M3A3 Bradley, BMD-3 Bakhcha, and 2T Stalker as the Light Tanks for the US Army, Russians and Middle Eastern Coalition respectively when they are all Infantry Fighting Vehicles. The Stalker deserves special mention as it and the MEC's main battle tank the Black Eagle never left the prototype stage in reality; both were canceled before the game came out but these next -generation designs are used not by the Russians who designed boththem but the Middle Eastern Coalition. [[Fridge Logic|Outside of the fact the MEC only appears in the final level, why would the Russians still use older Soviet designs and export their next generation ones?]]
** ''[[Battlefield 3]]'' is not as bad as the other entries as all the tanks are real tanks. However, this trope does still occur due to questionable placement of vehicles in the campaign. For example the Iranian Army is shown using T-90As when in reality they use modified T-72s (which also appear in the campaign), and the [[It's Raining Men|VDV]] uses BMP-2Ms instead of the actual air transportable BMD line which does get referenced in dialogue in the same mission.
* The first ''[[Command & Conquer]]'' used upgunned M2 Bradley IFVs as the Brotherhood of Nod's "Light tank". ''Renegade'' changed them into small (and quite low-profile) tanks.
 
Line 80 ⟶ 81:
* The British CVR(T) series of '''reconnaissance vehicles'''. Though if one defines "tank" as "tracked armoured vehicle with a turret-mounted gun and no space for infantry" then the Scorpion and Scimitar fit the bill, designed primarily for the reconnaissance role or not. Reconnaissance has always been the primary role of light tanks anyway.
* The Stryker - being an eight-wheeled gun platform - isn't too likely to get confused for a tank, but the same probably couldn't be said for the M2/M3 Bradley and Linebacker IFV/CFVs. They're armor plated, have a gun turret, tracks, but their primary function is [[Awesome Personnel Carrier|carrying troops into battle]] and giving them fire support in combat. [[Incredibly Lame Pun|Tanks]] to their speed and their ability to carry and launch anti-tank missiles, they do make for a respectable threat to enemy tanks on the battlefield. Though originally it was worried that their aluminum armor would make them too vulnerable to enemy fire, even after some steel plating was added on the sides, in practice the only Bradleys destroyed in combat have been [[Friendly Fire Index|at the hands of American M1 Abrams tanks]].
* The Russian BMP line of amphibious infantry fighting vehicles often get mistaken for tanks because of the tank-like shape and the size of their turrets and main guns. Though they ''have'' replaced the PT-76 light tanks in practice.
* News sources, and particularly [[The BBC]], have a tendency to mistakenly regard any armoured vehicle (especially those with tracks) as 'a tank', which can lead to confusing headlines about the Iraq conflict and so forth.
* In Germany, every tracked and armored vehicle is actually and correctly refered to as a Panzer, as "Panzer" simply being German for "armour" (in Dutch, it's spelled "Pantser", which somehow manages to look less scary - [[British English|especially if you're British]]). The Gepard Flakpanzer (Anti-Aircraft-Tank, based on Leopard 1 chassis), Marder 2A5 Schützenpanzer (ICV), Biber Brückenlegepanzer (Brigde-layer, based on Leopard 1 Chassis), Leopard 2A6 Kampfpanzer (MBT), Panzerhaubitze 2000 (Self-Propelled Howitzer). Even nontracked Vehicles like the Spürpanzer Fuchs and Spähpanzer Luchs (6x6 and 8x8 wheeled, lightly armored vehicles) are referred to as such, although not classifying as tanks at all. Correct German term for "tank" specifically would be "Panzerkampfwagen", and "Panzer" is a loose equivalent to English "AFV" (armoured fighting vehicle).<ref>[[Mind Screw|which literally translates to Panzerkampfwagen.]]</ref>
Line 87 ⟶ 88:
* When you get right down to it, none of the early tanks—the British Mark I & IV, the French Schneider & St. Chamond, or the German A7V Sturmpanzerwagen—were tanks, as they all lacked turrets and had guns with limited traverse. The first recognisable tank was the French Renault light tank, which featured a rotating turret and modern shape.
** Yes and no - they weren't tanks because they weren't water tanks, but at the time a rotating turret and "modern shape" had nothing at all to do with the definition of a tank in a military sense. The original tanks were just called "tanks" to hide their real nature. Besides, if a turret were really part of the definition, that would leave the Swedish S-Tank (Strv 103) MBT in a bit of a spot...
** The S-Tank is in that spot. It is a Tank Destroyer by all other countrycountries's definitions of a tank as brought up to John F. Kennedy when he expressed interest in acquiring them.
 
== Troping ==