Topic on User talk:NormAtredies

This is a permanent link to a single version of this post. This version is from 3 years ago. You can see the differences from the previous version, or view other versions on the post history page.

I admit I did do some editorializing and added loaded language, I also contend that the points I presented about those works are facts, not whitewashing. Whitewashing is covering things up, where and how was I doing that?

For example, on the edit history you linked, where I elaborated on Stephen King's book "Carrie"; "(in fact, Margaret's backstory involved her trying to join other Christian Fundamentalist groups but being rejected due to being too extreme, even for them). The story also shows that Margaret's beliefs and behavior actually have more to do with her abusive husband than any particular denomination's teachings." this is in the novel itself. Or when I added those points relating to the TV show Bones about their jab at creationists (look up the episode "The Archaeologist in the Cocoon"); while I editorialized, that's exactly what happens in the episode.

However, since I checked the definition of propaganda and realized propaganda can contain objective facts, I see where this all came from and take the "L".

How can I convince the mods I've learned to be objective in edits when I can't edit anything for six months?