What pattern of misconduct has warranted such a severe ban for a first strike? My last comment on the Trump page was in response to the the suggested trope of The Mole. In case this quote of mine was cited as evidence against me; "Besides, if he were a Democrat mole, then Democrats should be blamed for some of his mistakes and wrong-doing." That was part of the rebuttal to adding The Mole, not an anti-Democrat statement.
As stated earlier, why use the evidence on the Hollywood Atheist thread as evidence against me when it was a misunderstanding? To elaborate, Robkelk, LooneyTunes and I resolved it amiably months ago; it was a misunderstanding on how the trope applies, not an attempt to re-define it. And the Acceptable Religious Targets edits were walked back in line with site policies at Moderator request. Also, what about my edits on other pages? For example; I added character pages and tropes of World of Warcraft, for one? I even created a whole character page for Warcraft/The Light as seen here. Why isn't creating a whole new page on my trope page history?
In my opinion, a six month minimum blanket ban for a first strike is too harsh, even if this is trying to make an example of me for a cautionary tale (I don't think even TvTropes would go that far for first step disciplinary action); I could've conducted myself better but A BLANKET BAN FOR SIX MONTHS?
What do you think I am? What strong views do you think I'm trying to push? I think you have the wrong idea about me, including going by your cited reason for my edit ban. To give you information about me; yes I'm a Christian, but politically a swinging voter, I vote for whoever is the most competent. I'm not right-wing nor left, and not a member of any political party - my opinions on politics if I have to put it somewhere on the political spectrum would be center-right at most but personally a bit less nationalist. I questioned the sources used based on determine the veracity of their information for whether it's valid evidence for a trope and because some sources are as biased as each other just on opposite sides (eg; Fox News and CNN). I didn't add criticisms to Trump's page because nearly every criticism that could be said of him has already been said at length and I have acknowledged numerous times that the man has problems and deserves some of those criticism. I'll give you my opinion on Trump to clear the air; he has problems including being a sore loser, having a poor brain-to-mouth-filter, being insensitive, he took a major job he lacked experienced in and I think he's a poor husband... he also means well, is a good father, wants to help his country and those in it, gets a bad rap and as a President did pretty well considering his lack of prior political experience and intense opposition he faced. He's not the best choice for President among all US politicians, but imo he was the best/least bad of the 2016 and 2020 candidates. So I'm neither, and never have been, part of the "Trumpist" or "anti-Trump" crowd.
In conclusion, I definitely need to handle things with a cooler head, but I don't think I'm pushing what you think I'm pushing, protest the severity of my punishment and request leniency in the form of a lesser punishment, what say you?