Troll: Difference between revisions

15 bytes removed ,  8 years ago
m
clean up
No edit summary
m (clean up)
Line 1:
{{trope}}
[[File:webtroll_1682webtroll 1682.jpg|frame]]
 
{{quote|''Try to post a comment on youtube that is so stupid and offensive that it [[Poe's Law|cannot be taken seriously]] and immediately recognized as a parody of youtube comments. '''[[Failure Is the Only Option|You will fail.]]'''''|''[[Xkcd]]''}}
Line 10:
A case-in-point of the [[GIFT]], the troll delights in [[For the Evulz|sowing chaos; he is enamored by the thought that he can set off total strangers and derail entire forum topics by posting one simple message.]] At the same time, anonymity shields him from the uncomfortable realization that [[Internet Tough Guy|total strangers are currently fantasizing about his brutal and painful death]].
 
The easiest way for a troll to set off an argument is to find a forum devoted to a specific point-of-view -- fandomview—fandom, hobbyists, politics, what have you -- andyou—and post [[Refuge in Audacity|something inflammatory and profane]] holding an opposite viewpoint. An experienced troll makes sure to hit as many buttons as possible in a single post, making sure that others on the forum spend an equal amount of time responding to and refuting each point. I.E., on a fan forum for "X", a beginning troll may simply post "X Sucks", while an experienced troll may post a [[Hannibal Lecture|long essay]] on ''[["The Reason You Suck" Speech|why]]'' "[[Complaining About Shows You Don't Like|X Sucks]]" (usually full of [[Twisting the Words|lies]] and [[Paint the Hero Black|mischaracterizations]], but [[Villains Never Lie|using the truth]] makes it all the more frustrating for the regulars,) and a very experienced troll will even use [[Sock Puppet|Sock Puppets]]s to anger ''both'' sides of an argument at once. Troll messages are often characterized by poor grammar, poor punctuation, excessive use of net slang and CAPS. Whether this is real illiteracy or an additional attempt to garner a response depends on the individual.
 
In the world of fan fiction, an author who intentionally posts a story that is stupid, badly spelled, or otherwise insincere is also referred to as a 'troll', as are the stories in question themselves. The goal of such trolls seems to be to either laugh at the [[Misaimed Fandom|people who like their fic]], because they're obviously [[Fan Dumb|stupid]], or to laugh at the possibly self-righteous criticism they receive from more "serious" fic writers. See [[Troll Fic]].
Line 20:
This is a close cousin to the [[Wiki Vandal]], and sometimes another facet of the [[Single-Issue Wonk]]. May be the same people, for all we know. Contrast with the [[Internet Tough Guy|Internet (not so) Tough Guy]]: the troll does not go beyond insults, the Internet Tough Guy will add threats, and sometimes (albeit rarely) acts. Compare with [[The Gadfly]], who is not necessarily a troll but often partakes of some aspects of one.
 
One may think that the term "Trolling" comes from the way that people verb every noun they can get their metaphorical hands on, but it's actually the other way around: The (by now, mostly forgotten) origin of the term "Trolling" comes from the phrase "trolling for [[Fan Dumb|suckers]]," a reference to ''trawling'' as a technique in fishing, where a baited hook is slowly drawn through the water rather than simply being cast and allowed to stay in one place -- theplace—the idea being that the troll drags his bait through the group without staying around himself. The use of the term "troll" as a noun, and the attachment of mythical beastly [[Stealth Pun|trolls]] to the concept are all more recent additions.
 
Interestingly, other forums may take a different tack to dealing with Trolls. [[Wretched Hive|Certain forums]] cannot simply remove the trolls, as they consist of a large portion of their userbase. Instead, they defuse trolling with critical analysis of the trolls in question. Certain trolls may even earn renown for consistently posting high-grade trolls.
10,856

edits