Both Sides Have a Point: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 65:
* It's also why political power can and frequently does swing back and forth between different parties in democratic countries, as voters decide they like one party's policies at one time and then decide to switch to another party's policies later on. Sometimes parties who win elections and form governments end up plagiarizing parts of their opponents' platforms in order to broaden their own appeal in the electorate.
** Similarly, in the Canadian 2011 election, the arguably most centered party (Liberal) was squashed out in favour of the NDP, which is, for the most part, more to the left, and the Conservative party, the right-most major party, which was already strong beforehand. It's up to debate how much of this was because of Jack Layton, and how much it was because of the poor showing of the Liberals (including the fact that they ''didn't'' claim Both Sides Have a Point).
*** Considering that voting returned to the status quo in the next election when Jack Layton was no longer leader of the NDP, this was because of Jack Layton.
 
{{reflist}}
Line 70 ⟶ 71:
[[Category:Sociology Tropes]]
[[Category:Philosophy Tropes]]
[[Category:Alice and Bob]]