Is there a rule for spoilers on Fridge sub-pages?
User talk:Robkelk
Fridge pages use the same rules for spoilers that other pages use. All The Tropes:Style Guide/Spoilers.
I found an article on The Onion (https://www.theonion.com/kid-rock-starves-to-death-1819565599) that has multiple tropes, namely Digital Piracy Is Evil, [[I'm a Humanitarian] (implied with the passage “his last meal consisted of newspapers, cigar butts, old CD liner notes, and the partial remains of sidekick Joe C.”)], and (I think) Starving Artist. I know this may be a silly question, but would I be able to link the article in the tropes list on The Onion work page for each of those three tropes?
Sure, why not? As long as the link is on-topic on the pages that it's added to, I don't see any problem with listing it on multiple pages.
OK! I’m taking about linking it multiple times on the same page, namely the Works page for The Onion.
You wouldn't be the first to do that. Feel free to proceed.
There are a lot of people named in the {{admins}} tag who don't appear to be actively administrating the wiki right now. There's no point in filling your inboxes if you aren't reading the messages.
Please reply here, saying whether you want to stay on the list. I'm posting this on February 6 -- if I don't see a reply from you before February 15, I'll assume that you do not want to continue being pinged about admin business.
@Labster @Looney Toons @GethN7 @Robkelk @QuestionableSanity @Derivative @SelfCloak
Replying to myself, for completeness. Please keep my name on the list.
Same. If you aren't active and no longer wish to be or simply do not respond within a reasonable amount of time, I'm in favor of quietly removing the mod hat until such time as you can resume active service.
Please keep my name on the list, as well. And I second Geth's suggestion.
Agreeing with Geth's suggestion.
It's now February 15. Stripping out the names of people who did not reply, and revoking admin rights from @QuestionableSanity, @Derivative, and @SelfCloak.
Made today 21/7. I didn't add new tropes or hopefully no copyright violations. Thanks!
We've already told you: Please be patient.
Because you are not listening, you're now at the bottom of my priority list. Maybe somebody else will approve your changes before I see them.
Ok
@RobKelk: HDev411 is responsible for several incidents of copyright violation -- postdating your warning to him about copyrights -- which I have had to reject or correct. Do not approve anything of his without explicitly checking it against TV Tropes.
Understood, and thank you for the information.
Appear to have made some mistakes while replacing potholes, it's an easy enough fix but what happened?
I thought I caught all of those before I saved the update... Sometimes my hand brushes against my laptop's trackpad as I'm typing, and the cursor jumps a bit.
Oh relatable.
Hi Robkelk, would you be able to do me a small favour and grant Agent Isai temporary rollbacker
permissions, so he can view the moderation queue for the pending edits by Thistroperz? A day or two should do the trick. He is also a member of the SRE team
I've given Agent Isai rollbacker and moderator rights for one week.
@Labster @Looney Toons @GethN7 @Robkelk @QuestionableSanity @Derivative @SelfCloak
Thanks!
During one of the picture dramas, Beatrice impersonated Ange while calling Princess so that Beatrice could find out whether Princess thought Beatrice was a liability to the team - not knowing Ange was standing beside Princess at the time. Princess played along. |
Could this be a case of Because I'm Jonesy?
The other struck me as being a basic ulterior motive, but we don't seem to have a trope for that.
It could! Let's add that back in, with the trope identified.
EDIT: We're pretty close to launching this - the only thing stopping that is the fact that Dorothy, Ange, and Princess don't have individual writeups yet. (I just gave Gazelle a writeup.) I'm tempted to launch without them, and hang {{Characters need descriptions}} on the characters subpage...
I came here after getting kicked off of TV Tropes back in 2017. IIRC you need 3 successful page launches or something on there. I know All The Tropes wants to be different, but is there anything I need to have done before I can have a userpage?
You get a user page when you create your account. Yours is here.
As to what you put on your page... please don't get us in trouble with the law, insult other tropers, or run ads. Other than that, well, it's your page.
OK, thanks!
And of course I can't preview the test.
First, the page name: Wn4fz55iuamwacnt
Okay, that won't work - "PAGENAME" gave the thread name instead of the page name.
Maybe the root page name: Wn4fz55iuamwacnt
Still the thread name. Have I mentioned today that Flow sucks?
Top level page, maybe? Topic:Wn4fz55iuamwacnt
Once again, the thread name. Flow breaks magic words... which means I can't make that template after all. Aargh.
The "manga by decade" super-category specifies "were created" as way of classify mangas by decade. You included Bleach in "manga of the 2010s" category, I presume because it kept running in the 2010s, but it was created in 2001.
I want to remove it, but I want your opinion, and, if you so desire, if we should discuss possibly changing the category requirements. I just want to avoid an unnecessary edit war.
Of course, if you think the rule is okay as it is, I'll just remove Bleach from the category and be done with this.
Thank you for bringing this to my attention. The supercategory should say "were published", not "were created", in order to be consistent with the other supercategories.
Both "Manga of the 2000s" and "Manga of the 2010s" belong on Bleach. If it's still being published in Japan, add "Manga of the 2020s" as well.
I'd think you could just add "Manga of the 2000s" as a category, rather than remove anything.
Just add the category of "Manga of the 2000s", in this cass is better adding than substracting