Calvin and Hobbes/WMG: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted
m (Mass update links)
m (fix broken external links)
Line 356: Line 356:
== The identity of the famous [[Noodle Incident]] was... ==
== The identity of the famous [[Noodle Incident]] was... ==
An [[Accidental Kiss]] via spaghetti (noodles) a la ''[[Lady and The Tramp]]''. The recipient? [[Toy Ship|Susie Derkins]]. [[That Didn't Happen]], obviously. Or, if that's too squicky, she dropped her lunch and he shared his noodles with her... point being, it wasn't a prank. Calvin would be ''proud'' of that.
An [[Accidental Kiss]] via spaghetti (noodles) a la ''[[Lady and The Tramp]]''. The recipient? [[Toy Ship|Susie Derkins]]. [[That Didn't Happen]], obviously. Or, if that's too squicky, she dropped her lunch and he shared his noodles with her... point being, it wasn't a prank. Calvin would be ''proud'' of that.
* [[http://www.steph-angel.com/blog/wp-images/calvin<!-- 20and20hobbes/noodle-incident.gif The noodle incident was clearly something morally wrong]], because Hobbes mentions it when Calvin states that he's been good all year. Those two theories just aren't bad enough. -->
* [http://www.steph-angel.com/blog/wp-images/calvin%20and%20hobbes/noodle-incident.gif The noodle incident was clearly something morally wrong], because Hobbes mentions it when Calvin states that he's been good all year. Those two theories just aren't bad enough.
** In that context, [http://www.sinfest.net/archive_page.php?comicID=1562 Sinfest's theory] of an [[Unusual Euphemism]] may make sense.
** In that context, [http://www.sinfest.net/archive_page.php?comicID=1562 Sinfest's theory] of an [[Unusual Euphemism]] may make sense.
* [[User:Metalitia]]'s brother is under the impression that the [[Noodle Incident]] was a mishap either involving the brain Calvin made out of pasta for that one science project, or grossing Susie out at lunch by using manicotti to simulate his guts bursting through his chest. Somebody PLEASE help me prove him wrong. :(
* [[User:Metalitia]]'s brother is under the impression that the [[Noodle Incident]] was a mishap either involving the brain Calvin made out of pasta for that one science project, or grossing Susie out at lunch by using manicotti to simulate his guts bursting through his chest. Somebody PLEASE help me prove him wrong. :(
Line 601: Line 601:


== ''Calvin and Hobbes'' and ''[[Garfield]]'' take place in the same universe. ==
== ''Calvin and Hobbes'' and ''[[Garfield]]'' take place in the same universe. ==
The connection is [http://garfield.wikia.com/wiki/Lyman Lyman]. He disappears from ''Garfield'' in 1983, then a few years later reappears in ''Calvin & Hobbes''. Lyman is Calvin's [http://calvin.doriennesmith.com/comics/28.php Uncle Max]: his full name is Max Lyman. The evidence is that [http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_iRE1f7T37Zk/TU_ELSUX_PI/AAAAAAAAAYQ/5t-hEW8zlN8/s1600/14.+Imaginary+Friend.gif Max] and [http://uploads.neatorama.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/lyman.jpg Lyman] look the same, and have a similar sartorial taste. The few differences between the two (such as Max's bigger nose) can be explained by different artistic impressions of the same character. Max's hairline has receded somewhat since he was living with Jon, but there are years between his disappearance from Garfield and reappearance in Calvin & Hobbes, so that certainly could've happened. Max being Lyman also explain why he's [http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_iRE1f7T37Zk/TU_ELSUX_PI/AAAAAAAAAYQ/5t-hEW8zlN8/s1600/14.+Imaginary+Friend.gif worried about Calvin's imaginary friend], and why he says that all of his friends might've been imaginary too. When he was living Jon, they were caught up in a [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Folie_<!-- C3A0_deux folie à deux]], where they imagined their cat and dog were acting like human beings. Max realized he had to break away from this fantasy, but Jon, being the more infantile of the two, couldn't do the same. Max realized he had no choice but leave: that's why he disappeared so suddenly from ''Garfield'' and left Odie behind. His past history explains his comment about imaginary friends (he's referring to Garfield an Odie), as well as why he thinks Calvin having an imaginary friend might not be healthy for him. -->
The connection is [http://garfield.wikia.com/wiki/Lyman Lyman]. He disappears from ''Garfield'' in 1983, then a few years later reappears in ''Calvin & Hobbes''. Lyman is Calvin's [http://calvin.doriennesmith.com/comics/28.php Uncle Max]: his full name is Max Lyman. The evidence is that [http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_iRE1f7T37Zk/TU_ELSUX_PI/AAAAAAAAAYQ/5t-hEW8zlN8/s1600/14.+Imaginary+Friend.gif Max] and [http://uploads.neatorama.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/lyman.jpg Lyman] look the same, and have a similar sartorial taste. The few differences between the two (such as Max's bigger nose) can be explained by different artistic impressions of the same character. Max's hairline has receded somewhat since he was living with Jon, but there are years between his disappearance from Garfield and reappearance in Calvin & Hobbes, so that certainly could've happened. Max being Lyman also explain why he's [http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_iRE1f7T37Zk/TU_ELSUX_PI/AAAAAAAAAYQ/5t-hEW8zlN8/s1600/14.+Imaginary+Friend.gif worried about Calvin's imaginary friend], and why he says that all of his friends might've been imaginary too. When he was living Jon, they were caught up in a [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Folie_%C3%A0_deux folie à deux], where they imagined their cat and dog were acting like human beings. Max realized he had to break away from this fantasy, but Jon, being the more infantile of the two, couldn't do the same. Max realized he had no choice but leave: that's why he disappeared so suddenly from ''Garfield'' and left Odie behind. His past history explains his comment about imaginary friends (he's referring to Garfield an Odie), as well as why he thinks Calvin having an imaginary friend might not be healthy for him.


== Either Calvin or Hobbes is a [[Doctor Who (TV)|Time Lord]], maybe both are. ==
== Either Calvin or Hobbes is a [[Doctor Who (TV)|Time Lord]], maybe both are. ==