Converse Error: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(→Looks like this fallacy but is not:: clean up) |
m (categories and general cleanup) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Has nothing to do with shoes. |
Has nothing to do with shoes. |
||
=== '''[ |
=== '''[[wikipedia:Affirming the consequent|Affirming the consequent]]''': === |
||
:: This claim is most simply put as: |
:: This claim is most simply put as: |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
:: This is popular in conspiracy theories. Here the fallacy is fairly obvious; given the evidence, the car ''might'' be a Ferrari, but it might also be a Bugatti, Lamborghini, or any other model of performance car, since the ability to travel that fast is not unique to Ferraris. Hell, it might even be a Subaru Outback. Note that while this may appear to call all hypothesis / evidence experiments fallacious, they are based on additional evaluations of the likelihood of ''other'' theories, thus establishing that A ''is'' a likely cause of B. |
:: This is popular in conspiracy theories. Here the fallacy is fairly obvious; given the evidence, the car ''might'' be a Ferrari, but it might also be a Bugatti, Lamborghini, or any other model of performance car, since the ability to travel that fast is not unique to Ferraris. Hell, it might even be a Subaru Outback. Note that while this may appear to call all hypothesis / evidence experiments fallacious, they are based on additional evaluations of the likelihood of ''other'' theories, thus establishing that A ''is'' a likely cause of B. |
||
=== '''[ |
=== '''[[wikipedia:Denying the antecedent|Denying the antecedent]]''': === |
||
:: The flip side of the above, where you say that because the initial conditions did not happen, the result is impossible. |
:: The flip side of the above, where you say that because the initial conditions did not happen, the result is impossible. |
||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
Therefore I do not have a head. }} |
Therefore I do not have a head. }} |
||
:: Note that, by the [ |
:: Note that, by the [[wikipedia:Contrapositive|contrapositive]] rule, these two fallacies are equivalent. For example, you could replace "If a person is wearing a hat, they have a head" by the logically identical statement "If a person has no head, they aren't wearing a hat" to turn the first example of denying the antecedent into an example of affirming the consequent. |
||
Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
{{examples |
{{examples}} |
||
* In ''[[American Dad (Animation)|American Dad]]'', Stan sinks his entire savings to build a rocket for Steve to win a contest. |
* In ''[[American Dad (Animation)|American Dad]]'', Stan sinks his entire savings to build a rocket for Steve to win a contest. |
||