Death Note/Headscratchers/Rules of the Death Note: Difference between revisions

Rescuing 2 sources and tagging 0 as dead. #IABot (v2.0beta9)
(Rescuing 2 sources and tagging 0 as dead. #IABot (v2.0beta9))
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 344:
** Well, in the movie, writing {{spoiler|"Shiori is taken hostage and shot by the hostage taker" in conjunction with "Naomi takes the girlfriend of the person she suspects of being Kira hostage" is enough to make Naomi shoot Shiori, so possibly.}}
** Not exactly. Light wrote that {{spoiler|"Naomi shoots the escaping hostage to stop her from running" in conjunction with "Shiori dies taking a bullet for her boyfriend", which is what kills her.}}
<!-- %%** However, the series and the manga make clear that Death Note can't force anybody to kill anyone else. -->
<!-- %%*** It can't force ''the person named'' to kill anyone else, because then more than one person dies from writing one name; but it can probably make anyone the murderer of the named victim. -->
** What about accidents? Remember Light's very second murder? The one, coincidentally enough, mentioned right below this line?
*** You could even write "X is murdered" or "X is stabbed to death by a stranger". The problem isn't having the victim be killed by someone, it's specifying who would do the killing (since that would mean you'd have to write down their names which would result in heart attacks). No idea if using pseudonyms like "the first Kira" etc would work.
Line 371 ⟶ 369:
** It's left ambiguous. You can interpret "nothingness" as you like. Though Light's constant ''"I don't want to fade away"'' cries make it ''very'' likely it's the former.
*** Mu is an eastern concept that essentially means less than nothing. Less than zero. An empty void is still more substantial than mu.
<!-- %%*** IIRC, WordOfGod says he became a Shinigami. Probably a damn fine one. -->
<!-- %%*** No, in fact it's the complete opposite- that humans can't become Shinigami. Not to mention the idea "all humans go to 'mu'" (which is repeated over and over, and essentially implied "especially people who use a Death Note"). -->
* Does the 780 day rule include those who haven't been born yet? If so what would happen if a pregnant woman's name was written at a time where even with the 23 day buffer she couldn't be killed without also killing the baby?
** Do you know, I think you may have found a genuine loophole there.
** My guess? The Death Note doesn't consider fetuses to be people. So the woman would die and the baby would die with her. You can generalize the question by asking, "What if there was a situation where if one person had a heart attack, somebody else was guaranteed to die?" I guess this could happen if you hooked up an EKG to a bomb or something.
<!-- %% Dear God, someone DidNotDoTheResearch...: -->
<!-- %%*** Unlikely. In Japan, the fetus is considered to be a full human being, and indeed the Japanese celebrate birthdays on the day of conception rather than the day of emergence form the womb. -->
<!-- %%**** No, no they don't. -->
*** However, one of the rules states that you can use a death note to make someone die of a long-acting disease by writing the disease as a cause of death, and the death note causes the disease to start at the specified time of death. (For example, if you wrote "Alexei Karloff - cancer, December 7th at 12:07pm", Mr Karloff would develop cancer at the specified time, but not die of it until years later). Most likely, if you wrote the name of a pregnant woman, the death note would cause her to develop some sort of complication resulting in death during childbirth.
*** If you want to get really grisly, then there has been cases of legally dead women completing a pregnancy and a living baby being extracted from them.
Line 551 ⟶ 544:
** This was done in the movie. It works. Dunno about the anime/manga canon, though.
** Well if we're talking about the [[Magnificent Bastard]] Light using the Death Note, he has more than enough intelligence to rig the deaths of the people he write into his Death Note to make it seem like a perfect murder suicide scenario. So I'd say yes.
** Sorry, but the answer is "no". See the relevant rule [https://web.archive.org/web/20090131113314/http://www.onemanga.com/Death_Note/45/19/ here]
** You couldn't actually make one kill the other in the anime or manga, but if one only needed to make it look like a murder/suicide, it could be written:
{{quote|'''''Kaneda Isao'''''
Line 620 ⟶ 613:
* If a Bob is fated to save Alice, but Bob's name is written on a death note and instructed to die before saving Alice, will that count as "leads to a death of more than the intended" and therefore dies by a heart attack? If so, does that mean Alice will die anyway because nobody could save her? Or the death or Bob will be cancelled? Or a third person, named Clay, will save Alice instead?
* There something I don't understand. I probably lost track, but as I remember: If you give up the ownership of your death-note, all death-note related memories will be erased. If you touch it again, you'll regain them, but only as long as you're touching it, unless you become it's owner again. That's why Light had to hold the Death-Note while writing Higuchi's name on the piece of paper. All clear. Then, we see Light giving up his ownership of the Deathnote and sending it to Task Force, while telling Misa he'd take her Death Note and thus remember everything. Does that mean that He was holding her Note during the whole time, until his father died?
** Yes. In the manga they mention he uses a kind of corset thing and keeps it pressed against his body. In the anime however, they show ''exactly'' [[Trouser Space|where he keeps the notebook]]: [https://web.archive.org/web/20160616192929/http://deathnotefansite.deviantart.com/art/Death-Note-Lights-Hiding-Place-257199331\]
* Can a past-Death Note user (who lost their memories) be forced to remember under the Death Note control? If Ryuk wrote Light's name in his book and put "he regains Death Note-related memories, confesses, and then dies", would Light's amnesia be broken or not, considering he didn't regain ownership of a Death Note again?
* One of the rules is you can't kill anyone under 2 years old, roughly.. Why would you need to kill anyone a 3 year old? Or most little kids for that matter? Also what happens if - like the rule book says the limit is - a 6 - 10 year old grabs hold of the book?
Line 641 ⟶ 634:
 
{{reflist}}
[[Category:Death Note Rules Of The Death Note]]
[[Category:Headscratchers]]
__NOTOC__[[Category:Pages with comment tags]]
[[Category:Death Note]]
[[Category:Anime and Manga/Headscratchers]]