Deconstruction/Analysis: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted

Inline

Revision as of 11:20, 16 April 2014 (view source) Dai-Guard (talk \| contribs) m (Mass update links) ← Older edit		Revision as of 18:57, 1 February 2015 (view source) Gethbot (talk \| contribs) m (clean up) Newer edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{trope}}		{{Analysis}}{{trope}}
	Deconstruction is similar to a valid arguing tactic called ''Reductio Ad Absurdum''. It takes the opponent's argument and logically follows it through to an absurd or indefensible conclusion. [[Schroedingers Cat]] is a classic example of this.		Deconstruction is similar to a valid arguing tactic called ''Reductio Ad Absurdum''. It takes the opponent's argument and logically follows it through to an absurd or indefensible conclusion. [[Schroedingers Cat]] is a classic example of this.