39,327
edits
Dethroning Moment of Suck (Darth Wiki)/Web Original/The Irate Gamer: Difference between revisions
Dethroning Moment of Suck (Darth Wiki)/Web Original/The Irate Gamer (view source)
Revision as of 03:45, 11 August 2014
, 9 years agoupdate links
m (GethN7 moved page Dethroning Moment of Suck (Darth Wiki)/The Irate Gamer to Dethroning Moment of Suck/The Irate Gamer) |
m (update links) |
||
Line 9:
* No contesting entries. This is subjective, the entry is their opinion.
* No natter. As above, anything contesting an entry will be cut, and anything that's just contributing more can be made its own entry.
* Explain ''why'' it's a [[
* No ASSCAPS, no bold, and no italics unless it's the title of a work. We are not yelling the DMoSs out loud.
----
Line 16:
** ...reviews the wrong game mode of [[Tekken]] 6. He reviewed the Scenario Mode, instead of the actual fighting game mode. [[Flat What|This had to be pointed out to him in person.]] In the [[YouTube]] version, he (for once) admits his mistake, but adds that he's a [[Mortal Kombat]] fan, so he can't understand this game's appeal.
** ...reviews ''[[Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles Turtles in Time]]: Reshelled'', by saying that he liked it better than the original. [[Your Mileage May Vary]] there, most didn't like it at all. However, the kicker was when he compared the two side-by-side, and for the "original" game footage, he used the [[Super Nintendo]] version of Turtles in Time instead of the original arcade game, which came out first. This is the same mistake he made a fucking year ago.
* [[Tropers/Cliche|Cliche]]: The Irate Gamer's ''[[Super Mario Bros. 2]]'' review, in which he acts like the fact that it was a [[Dolled-Up Installment]] of ''Doki Doki Panic'' [[Viewers are Morons|was a huge shocking revelation and not something every gamer at least half-heartedly versed in gaming history knows already]]. And if that wasn't bad enough, he goes on to attack the game for ridiculous, contrived reasons. Toad has a use in being the fastest and strongest character, it isn't that hard to chain attacks on enemies to gain hearts, and he was obviously using cut and paste editing to claim he could take a dump in the time the Star would touch the character, not to mention positioning it in the area where it would naturally take the most time to get. He's just bashing a classic game for the sake of bashing a classic game, and he doesn't even make good arguments for them either.
* [[Tropers/terlwyth|terlwyth]]: His review of The Odyssey, which was laden with plenty [[Did Not Do the Research|of errors]]. But the worst was his "joke" about the Simon Says game for it where he adds flash cards referencing probably the only date he'll ever get after this, [[A Date with Rosie Palms|one with rosie palms]] and other kind of junk like that.
* [[Tropers/Bat Dan|Bat Dan]]: For me, it's from the first video I ever saw, his review of [[Zombies Ate My Neighbors]]. The moment he called it a bad game that "deserved to be chucked into the nearest meat grinder" I knew this guy was fake. It only got worse with pointless complaints (the weapons are stupid, you only get 3 lives and passwords), unfunny jokes, and complaining that the ending was an actual level instead of boring credits. Most of his complaints were aspects that gamers would find good.
| |||